Tools & Wizards About Us
postmaker.io screenshot

Report Summary

  • 27

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    46% of other websites

  • 93

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 80% of websites

  • 92

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    80% of websites

  • 85

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    55% of websites

postmaker.io

Social Media Content Creation & Scheduling | PostMaker

Page Load Speed

1.4 sec in total

First Response

26 ms

Resources Loaded

904 ms

Page Rendered

514 ms

postmaker.io screenshot

About Website

Visit postmaker.io now to see the best up-to-date Post Maker content for United States and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about postmaker.io

Tired of struggling with social media? Try PostMaker – your solution for effortless content creation, spintax variations, and smart scheduling.

Visit postmaker.io

Key Findings

We analyzed Postmaker.io page load time and found that the first response time was 26 ms and then it took 1.4 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 30% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

postmaker.io performance score

27

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value6.2 s

3/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value8.7 s

1/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value6.2 s

44/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value1,470 ms

14/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.044

99/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value10.0 s

26/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

postmaker.io

26 ms

js

145 ms

4zlfd6sjek

247 ms

thrivecart.js

108 ms

embed.js

244 ms

Our browser made a total of 31 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 13% of them (4 requests) were addressed to the original Postmaker.io, 32% (10 requests) were made to Cdn.postmaker.io and 13% (4 requests) were made to Cdn.iubenda.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (453 ms) relates to the external source Cdn.postmaker.io.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 58.4 kB (51%)

Content Size

114.2 kB

After Optimization

55.9 kB

  • HTML
  • JavaScript

In fact, the total size of Postmaker.io main page is 114.2 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 30% of websites need less resources to load. HTML takes 68.9 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-76%

Potential reduce by 52.3 kB

  • Original 68.9 kB
  • After minification 68.9 kB
  • After compression 16.6 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 52.3 kB or 76% of the original size.

JavaScript Optimization

-13%

Potential reduce by 6.1 kB

  • Original 45.4 kB
  • After minification 45.4 kB
  • After compression 39.3 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 6.1 kB or 13% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 12 (44%)

Requests Now

27

After Optimization

15

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 27 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Post Maker. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 10 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 4 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

postmaker.io

postmaker.io

26 ms

js

js

145 ms

4zlfd6sjek

4zlfd6sjek

247 ms

thrivecart.js

thrivecart.js

108 ms

embed.js

embed.js

244 ms

stub.js

stub.js

138 ms

iubenda_cs.js

iubenda_cs.js

141 ms

iubenda_cons.js

iubenda_cons.js

173 ms

404-921ffc7b.css

404-921ffc7b.css

26 ms

index-905ef584.css

index-905ef584.css

33 ms

QAJlznLV.webp

QAJlznLV.webp

358 ms

5LVaVDjl.webp

5LVaVDjl.webp

347 ms

3sM5dDRX.webp

3sM5dDRX.webp

347 ms

wGsa9j4V.webp

wGsa9j4V.webp

429 ms

awtkQ19i.webp

awtkQ19i.webp

431 ms

TNimLrfM.webp

TNimLrfM.webp

427 ms

SmQJPynP.webp

SmQJPynP.webp

453 ms

DX8AwobR.webp

DX8AwobR.webp

376 ms

screenie.webp

screenie.webp

375 ms

overview.webp

overview.webp

395 ms

logo.svg

logo.svg

40 ms

inter.css

inter.css

216 ms

css

css

228 ms

core-8fdcb29dc2a89f2172df78c5f7cb048f.js

core-8fdcb29dc2a89f2172df78c5f7cb048f.js

175 ms

me.webp

me.webp

155 ms

clarity.js

clarity.js

102 ms

KFOmCnqEu92Fr1Mu4mxP.ttf

KFOmCnqEu92Fr1Mu4mxP.ttf

52 ms

KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmEU9fBBc9.ttf

KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmEU9fBBc9.ttf

68 ms

KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmWUlfBBc9.ttf

KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmWUlfBBc9.ttf

68 ms

mix-manifest.json

mix-manifest.json

19 ms

polyfill.min.js

polyfill.min.js

448 ms

Accessibility Review

postmaker.io accessibility score

93

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Tables and lists

These are opportunities to improve the experience of reading tabular or list data using assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

<dl>'s do not contain only properly-ordered <dt> and <dd> groups, <script>, <template> or <div> elements.

High

Definition list items are not wrapped in <dl> elements

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Best Practices

postmaker.io best practices score

92

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Missing source maps for large first-party JavaScript

SEO Factors

postmaker.io SEO score

85

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have descriptive text

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Postmaker.io can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Postmaker.io main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

postmaker.io

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Post Maker. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: