Report Summary

  • 67

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    79% of other websites

  • 94

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 83% of websites

  • 83

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    55% of websites

  • 93

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    83% of websites

postsaver.com

Guaranteed Fence Post Rot Protection Since 1994 | Postsaver

Page Load Speed

1.9 sec in total

First Response

307 ms

Resources Loaded

1.5 sec

Page Rendered

111 ms

postsaver.com screenshot

About Website

Click here to check amazing Postsaver content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about postsaver.com

Postsaver offers a 20 year guarantee for wooden fence posts. Pre-wrapped posts, sleeves & post foam take the stress out of fence maintenance.

Visit postsaver.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Postsaver.com page load time and found that the first response time was 307 ms and then it took 1.6 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 35% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

postsaver.com performance score

67

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value2.3 s

75/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value5.3 s

22/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value3.2 s

92/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value340 ms

74/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.077

95/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value4.4 s

83/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

postsaver.com

307 ms

www.postsaver.com

434 ms

ecf.css

44 ms

style.min.css

64 ms

oxygen.css

74 ms

Our browser made a total of 17 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 71% of them (12 requests) were addressed to the original Postsaver.com, 12% (2 requests) were made to A.plerdy.com and 12% (2 requests) were made to Staging.postsaver.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (592 ms) relates to the external source Staging.postsaver.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 13.5 kB (23%)

Content Size

58.1 kB

After Optimization

44.6 kB

In fact, the total size of Postsaver.com main page is 58.1 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 30% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 40.5 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-77%

Potential reduce by 13.5 kB

  • Original 17.6 kB
  • After minification 17.3 kB
  • After compression 4.1 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 13.5 kB or 77% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 0 B

  • Original 40.5 kB
  • After minification 40.5 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Postsaver images are well optimized though.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 8 (62%)

Requests Now

13

After Optimization

5

The browser has sent 13 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Postsaver. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 4 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 6 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Accessibility Review

postsaver.com accessibility score

94

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Best Practices

postsaver.com best practices score

83

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

SEO Factors

postsaver.com SEO score

93

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Postsaver.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Postsaver.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Postsaver. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: