Tools & Wizards About Us
powereasy.in screenshot

Report Summary

  • 10

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    23% of other websites

  • 87

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 66% of websites

  • 58

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    20% of websites

  • 77

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    36% of websites

powereasy.in

PowerEasy

Page Load Speed

3 sec in total

First Response

304 ms

Resources Loaded

1.9 sec

Page Rendered

776 ms

powereasy.in screenshot

About Website

Visit powereasy.in now to see the best up-to-date Power Easy content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about powereasy.in

Startbox

Visit powereasy.in

Key Findings

We analyzed Powereasy.in page load time and found that the first response time was 304 ms and then it took 2.7 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 50% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

powereasy.in performance score

10

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value2.9 s

52/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value21.8 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value12.9 s

2/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value3,230 ms

2/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.403

25/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value29.2 s

0/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

powereasy.in

304 ms

css2

39 ms

magnific-popup.css

122 ms

swiper-bundle.css

125 ms

main.css

341 ms

Our browser made a total of 92 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 75% of them (69 requests) were addressed to the original Powereasy.in, 5% (5 requests) were made to Youtube.com and 5% (5 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1 sec) belongs to the original domain Powereasy.in.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 479.5 kB (11%)

Content Size

4.5 MB

After Optimization

4.1 MB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Powereasy.in main page is 4.5 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 80% of websites need less resources to load and that’s why Accessify’s recommendations for optimization and resource minification can be helpful for this project. Images take 3.4 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-90%

Potential reduce by 117.4 kB

  • Original 129.8 kB
  • After minification 63.6 kB
  • After compression 12.4 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 66.2 kB, which is 51% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 117.4 kB or 90% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-4%

Potential reduce by 127.3 kB

  • Original 3.4 MB
  • After minification 3.3 MB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Power Easy images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-24%

Potential reduce by 188.8 kB

  • Original 783.5 kB
  • After minification 781.1 kB
  • After compression 594.7 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 188.8 kB or 24% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-23%

Potential reduce by 46.1 kB

  • Original 198.4 kB
  • After minification 198.4 kB
  • After compression 152.3 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Powereasy.in needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 46.1 kB or 23% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 41 (49%)

Requests Now

84

After Optimization

43

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 84 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Power Easy. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 38 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 5 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

powereasy.in

powereasy.in

304 ms

css2

css2

39 ms

magnific-popup.css

magnific-popup.css

122 ms

swiper-bundle.css

swiper-bundle.css

125 ms

main.css

main.css

341 ms

jquery.min.js

jquery.min.js

172 ms

jquery.js

jquery.js

285 ms

plugins.js

plugins.js

633 ms

functions.js

functions.js

510 ms

custom.js

custom.js

257 ms

7614255.js

7614255.js

52 ms

bootstrap.js

bootstrap.js

182 ms

bootstrap.bundle.min.js

bootstrap.bundle.min.js

28 ms

jquery.min.js

jquery.min.js

26 ms

imagesloaded.pkgd.js

imagesloaded.pkgd.js

119 ms

isotope.pkgd.js

isotope.pkgd.js

139 ms

jarallax.js

jarallax.js

143 ms

jarallax-element.js

jarallax-element.js

176 ms

jquery.countdown.js

jquery.countdown.js

183 ms

jquery.magnific-popup.js

jquery.magnific-popup.js

200 ms

ofi.js

ofi.js

199 ms

jquery.inview.js

jquery.inview.js

233 ms

swiper-bundle.js

swiper-bundle.js

505 ms

gist-embed.min.js

gist-embed.min.js

244 ms

helpers.js

helpers.js

260 ms

show-on-scroll.js

show-on-scroll.js

259 ms

countdown.js

countdown.js

502 ms

isotope.js

isotope.js

503 ms

navbar.js

navbar.js

505 ms

stretch-column.js

stretch-column.js

506 ms

swiper.js

swiper.js

507 ms

others.js

others.js

507 ms

nBdhP92jnuY

nBdhP92jnuY

261 ms

Aditya.pdf

Aditya.pdf

645 ms

nirvaan.pdf

nirvaan.pdf

1048 ms

powereasy.png

powereasy.png

151 ms

home-1-shape-364x300.png

home-1-shape-364x300.png

152 ms

call-to-action-1920x1080.jpg

call-to-action-1920x1080.jpg

462 ms

main%20banner.jpg

main%20banner.jpg

212 ms

why%20automated%20audit%2003.jpg

why%20automated%20audit%2003.jpg

150 ms

why%20automated%20audit%2004.jpg

why%20automated%20audit%2004.jpg

581 ms

why%20automated%20audit%2007.jpg

why%20automated%20audit%2007.jpg

460 ms

why%20automated%20audit%2008.jpg

why%20automated%20audit%2008.jpg

633 ms

tbg2.png

tbg2.png

211 ms

3.jpg

3.jpg

459 ms

infinity.png

infinity.png

459 ms

home-2-shape-390x294.png

home-2-shape-390x294.png

579 ms

4.jpg

4.jpg

638 ms

24X7%20Realtime%20Monitoring.jpg

24X7%20Realtime%20Monitoring.jpg

580 ms

electrical%20risk.jpg

electrical%20risk.jpg

578 ms

Cloud%20base.jpg

Cloud%20base.jpg

883 ms

analysis.jpg

analysis.jpg

638 ms

Call%20Center.jpg

Call%20Center.jpg

638 ms

Money%20Saving.jpg

Money%20Saving.jpg

883 ms

case-study2.jpg

case-study2.jpg

1045 ms

case-study3.jpg

case-study3.jpg

458 ms

case-study1.jpg

case-study1.jpg

582 ms

testimonial-shape-232x325.png

testimonial-shape-232x325.png

1038 ms

client4.jpeg

client4.jpeg

1042 ms

client1.jpeg

client1.jpeg

924 ms

gandhinagar.png

gandhinagar.png

929 ms

client2.jpeg

client2.jpeg

933 ms

client3.jpeg

client3.jpeg

926 ms

client6.jpeg

client6.jpeg

928 ms

clientlog.jpeg

clientlog.jpeg

928 ms

7.jpg

7.jpg

928 ms

8.jpg

8.jpg

929 ms

9.jpg

9.jpg

929 ms

UcCO3FwrK3iLTeHuS_nVMrMxCp50SjIw2boKoduKmMEVuFuYMZtrib2Au-0.woff

UcCO3FwrK3iLTeHuS_nVMrMxCp50SjIw2boKoduKmMEVuFuYMZtrib2Au-0.woff

37 ms

UcCO3FwrK3iLTeHuS_nVMrMxCp50SjIw2boKoduKmMEVuI6fMZtrib2Au-0.woff

UcCO3FwrK3iLTeHuS_nVMrMxCp50SjIw2boKoduKmMEVuI6fMZtrib2Au-0.woff

68 ms

UcCO3FwrK3iLTeHuS_nVMrMxCp50SjIw2boKoduKmMEVuLyfMZtrib2Au-0.woff

UcCO3FwrK3iLTeHuS_nVMrMxCp50SjIw2boKoduKmMEVuLyfMZtrib2Au-0.woff

69 ms

10.jpg

10.jpg

908 ms

11.jpg

11.jpg

908 ms

12.jpg

12.jpg

908 ms

13.jpg

13.jpg

910 ms

14.jpg

14.jpg

891 ms

pilot.jpeg

pilot.jpeg

838 ms

www-player.css

www-player.css

301 ms

www-embed-player.js

www-embed-player.js

348 ms

base.js

base.js

446 ms

fb.js

fb.js

216 ms

7614255.js

7614255.js

448 ms

7614255.js

7614255.js

603 ms

conversations-embed.js

conversations-embed.js

215 ms

collectedforms.js

collectedforms.js

605 ms

leadflows.js

leadflows.js

220 ms

ad_status.js

ad_status.js

281 ms

jDVVIT4ZwDHfBiET8TcWj790JrYgF6qU1g_sOcBWI_w.js

jDVVIT4ZwDHfBiET8TcWj790JrYgF6qU1g_sOcBWI_w.js

213 ms

embed.js

embed.js

104 ms

KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmEU9fBBc-AMP6lQ.woff

KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmEU9fBBc-AMP6lQ.woff

51 ms

KFOmCnqEu92Fr1Mu4mxMKTU1Kg.woff

KFOmCnqEu92Fr1Mu4mxMKTU1Kg.woff

50 ms

id

id

47 ms

Accessibility Review

powereasy.in accessibility score

87

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Best Practices

powereasy.in best practices score

58

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Displays images with incorrect aspect ratio

High

Serves images with low resolution

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

High

Missing source maps for large first-party JavaScript

SEO Factors

powereasy.in SEO score

77

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have descriptive text

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Powereasy.in can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Powereasy.in main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

powereasy.in

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Power Easy. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: