5.6 sec in total
466 ms
3.3 sec
1.9 sec
Click here to check amazing Power Of The Web content for United States. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about poweroftheweb.net
The Power of the Web team is a Web Design Agency in Minneapolis, MN that utilizes over a decade of experience in web development, SEO, and UI/UX design...
Visit poweroftheweb.netWe analyzed Poweroftheweb.net page load time and found that the first response time was 466 ms and then it took 5.1 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 70% of websites can load faster.
poweroftheweb.net performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value4.8 s
11/100
10%
Value11.0 s
0/100
25%
Value11.3 s
5/100
10%
Value10,170 ms
0/100
30%
Value0.128
82/100
15%
Value16.5 s
5/100
10%
466 ms
102 ms
216 ms
347 ms
395 ms
Our browser made a total of 87 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 69% of them (60 requests) were addressed to the original Poweroftheweb.net, 24% (21 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 2% (2 requests) were made to Googletagmanager.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (836 ms) belongs to the original domain Poweroftheweb.net.
Page size can be reduced by 116.2 kB (30%)
386.3 kB
270.0 kB
In fact, the total size of Poweroftheweb.net main page is 386.3 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 75% of websites need less resources to load and that’s why Accessify’s recommendations for optimization and resource minification can be helpful for this project. Images take 225.9 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 112.0 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 112.0 kB or 80% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 4.2 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Power Of The Web images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 50 B
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.
Number of requests can be reduced by 46 (72%)
64
18
The browser has sent 64 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Power Of The Web. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 29 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 19 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
poweroftheweb.net
466 ms
js
102 ms
style.min.css
216 ms
style.css
347 ms
main.css
395 ms
font-awesome.css
380 ms
flaticon.css
363 ms
slick.css
335 ms
slick-theme.css
334 ms
animate.min.css
386 ms
elementor-icons.min.css
430 ms
frontend-lite.min.css
537 ms
post-5.css
428 ms
frontend-lite.min.css
423 ms
global.css
560 ms
post-8.css
573 ms
jquery.min.js
625 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
611 ms
owl.carousel.css
612 ms
css
92 ms
widget-icon-box.min.css
574 ms
fontawesome-all.min.css
493 ms
fontawesome-v4-shims.css
491 ms
dynamic-conditions-public.js
489 ms
main.bundle.js
677 ms
jquery-3.6.0.min.js
836 ms
skip-link-focus-fix.js
673 ms
jquery.fancybox.min.js
818 ms
imagesloaded.pkgd.min.js
673 ms
isotope.pkgd.min.js
676 ms
packery-mode.pkgd.min.js
816 ms
elementor.js
817 ms
slick.min.js
820 ms
custom.js
821 ms
owl.carousel.min.js
834 ms
webpack-pro.runtime.min.js
821 ms
webpack.runtime.min.js
822 ms
frontend-modules.min.js
825 ms
regenerator-runtime.min.js
821 ms
js
207 ms
analytics.js
47 ms
wp-polyfill.min.js
764 ms
collect
287 ms
hooks.min.js
641 ms
i18n.min.js
633 ms
frontend.min.js
615 ms
waypoints.min.js
600 ms
core.min.js
588 ms
frontend.min.js
560 ms
elements-handlers.min.js
556 ms
collect
457 ms
logo.png
202 ms
Home-3.jpg
337 ms
adaptative.svg
208 ms
responsive.svg
215 ms
design-thinking-1.svg
211 ms
content.svg
217 ms
seo.svg
221 ms
trophy.svg
223 ms
interaction.svg
231 ms
tasks.svg
234 ms
Home-Page.png
255 ms
1521486016347.jpg
238 ms
1516856800169.jpg
214 ms
logo.png
229 ms
KFOmCnqEu92Fr1Mu4mxPKTU1Kg.ttf
94 ms
KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmEU9fBBc9AMP6lQ.ttf
200 ms
KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmSU5fBBc9AMP6lQ.ttf
254 ms
KFOkCnqEu92Fr1MmgVxIIzcXKMny.ttf
261 ms
KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmWUlfBBc9AMP6lQ.ttf
255 ms
KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmYUtfBBc9AMP6lQ.ttf
256 ms
JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCu173w5aX9-p7K4GLs.ttf
256 ms
JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCuM73w5aX9-p7K4GLs.ttf
254 ms
JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCvr73w5aX9-p7K4GLs.ttf
260 ms
JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCvC73w5aX9-p7K4GLs.ttf
259 ms
JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCtZ6Hw5aX9-p7K4GLs.ttf
259 ms
JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCtr6Hw5aX9-p7K4GLs.ttf
255 ms
JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCs16Hw5aX9-p7K4GLs.ttf
264 ms
JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCvr6Hw5aX9-p7K4GLs.ttf
263 ms
JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCtr6Xw5aX9-p7K4GLs.ttf
262 ms
KFOkCnqEu92Fr1Mu51xIIzcXKMny.ttf
267 ms
KFOjCnqEu92Fr1Mu51S7ACc6CsHYl4BO.ttf
260 ms
KFOjCnqEu92Fr1Mu51TjASc6CsHYl4BO.ttf
260 ms
KFOiCnqEu92Fr1Mu51QrEzAdKuvwnYg.ttf
262 ms
KFOjCnqEu92Fr1Mu51TzBic6CsHYl4BO.ttf
265 ms
KFOjCnqEu92Fr1Mu51TLBCc6CsHYl4BO.ttf
263 ms
flaticon.ttf
195 ms
poweroftheweb.net accessibility score
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Buttons do not have an accessible name
Links do not have a discernible name
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
poweroftheweb.net best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Page has valid source maps
poweroftheweb.net SEO score
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Poweroftheweb.net can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Poweroftheweb.net main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
poweroftheweb.net
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Power Of The Web. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: