Tools & Wizards About Us
pps.in screenshot

Report Summary

  • 40

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    59% of other websites

  • 94

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 83% of websites

  • 92

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    80% of websites

  • 83

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    46% of websites

pps.in

Prakash Parcel Services Limited - Logistics, Transportation, Warehousing, Custom Clearance, Project Cargo, Customized Solutions

Page Load Speed

11.9 sec in total

First Response

553 ms

Resources Loaded

10.5 sec

Page Rendered

833 ms

pps.in screenshot

About Website

Welcome to pps.in homepage info - get ready to check Pps best content for India right away, or after learning these important things about pps.in

Prakash Parcel Services Limited started in 1992, was the parcel division of the erstwhile Prakash Group, one of India’s few transport companies started in the 1960s.

Visit pps.in

Key Findings

We analyzed Pps.in page load time and found that the first response time was 553 ms and then it took 11.3 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 90% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

pps.in performance score

40

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value12.0 s

0/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value18.4 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value24.7 s

0/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value270 ms

82/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.001

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value29.6 s

0/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

pps.in

553 ms

www.pps.in

3013 ms

frontend.min.css

1217 ms

css

30 ms

dashicons.min.css

688 ms

Our browser made a total of 89 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 83% of them (74 requests) were addressed to the original Pps.in, 13% (12 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 2% (2 requests) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (3 sec) belongs to the original domain Pps.in.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 1.2 MB (19%)

Content Size

6.3 MB

After Optimization

5.1 MB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Pps.in main page is 6.3 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 60% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 4.8 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-80%

Potential reduce by 187.7 kB

  • Original 234.1 kB
  • After minification 228.1 kB
  • After compression 46.3 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 187.7 kB or 80% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-1%

Potential reduce by 29.4 kB

  • Original 4.8 MB
  • After minification 4.7 MB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Pps images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-70%

Potential reduce by 318.7 kB

  • Original 456.6 kB
  • After minification 451.4 kB
  • After compression 137.9 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 318.7 kB or 70% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-80%

Potential reduce by 655.7 kB

  • Original 823.3 kB
  • After minification 818.4 kB
  • After compression 167.6 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Pps.in needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 655.7 kB or 80% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 49 (72%)

Requests Now

68

After Optimization

19

  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 68 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Pps. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 24 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 27 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

pps.in

pps.in

553 ms

www.pps.in

www.pps.in

3013 ms

frontend.min.css

frontend.min.css

1217 ms

css

css

30 ms

dashicons.min.css

dashicons.min.css

688 ms

elusive.min.css

elusive.min.css

722 ms

all.min.css

all.min.css

1465 ms

foundation-icons.min.css

foundation-icons.min.css

991 ms

genericons.min.css

genericons.min.css

992 ms

extra.min.css

extra.min.css

917 ms

style.min.css

style.min.css

1440 ms

style.css

style.css

1146 ms

astra-addon-6500ab281eaa57-63144797.css

astra-addon-6500ab281eaa57-63144797.css

1471 ms

elementor-icons.min.css

elementor-icons.min.css

1199 ms

frontend-lite.min.css

frontend-lite.min.css

1698 ms

swiper.min.css

swiper.min.css

1338 ms

post-523.css

post-523.css

1447 ms

frontend-lite.min.css

frontend-lite.min.css

1569 ms

all.min.css

all.min.css

1642 ms

v4-shims.min.css

v4-shims.min.css

1670 ms

post-1056.css

post-1056.css

1676 ms

post-629.css

post-629.css

1694 ms

style.css

style.css

1798 ms

css

css

18 ms

fontawesome.min.css

fontawesome.min.css

1696 ms

solid.min.css

solid.min.css

1727 ms

brands.min.css

brands.min.css

1733 ms

jquery.min.js

jquery.min.js

2000 ms

jquery-migrate.min.js

jquery-migrate.min.js

1758 ms

v4-shims.min.js

v4-shims.min.js

1840 ms

js

js

54 ms

widget-icon-box.min.css

widget-icon-box.min.css

1935 ms

widget-icon-list.min.css

widget-icon-list.min.css

1968 ms

frontend.min.js

frontend.min.js

1929 ms

astra-addon-6500ab282054c4-46235960.js

astra-addon-6500ab282054c4-46235960.js

1928 ms

livetrack.js

livetrack.js

1947 ms

imagesloaded.min.js

imagesloaded.min.js

1990 ms

webpack-pro.runtime.min.js

webpack-pro.runtime.min.js

2016 ms

webpack.runtime.min.js

webpack.runtime.min.js

2019 ms

frontend-modules.min.js

frontend-modules.min.js

2025 ms

wp-polyfill-inert.min.js

wp-polyfill-inert.min.js

1840 ms

regenerator-runtime.min.js

regenerator-runtime.min.js

1922 ms

wp-polyfill.min.js

wp-polyfill.min.js

1770 ms

hooks.min.js

hooks.min.js

1703 ms

i18n.min.js

i18n.min.js

1732 ms

frontend.min.js

frontend.min.js

1739 ms

waypoints.min.js

waypoints.min.js

1610 ms

core.min.js

core.min.js

1646 ms

frontend.min.js

frontend.min.js

1553 ms

elements-handlers.min.js

elements-handlers.min.js

1490 ms

underscore.min.js

underscore.min.js

1502 ms

wp-util.min.js

wp-util.min.js

1506 ms

frontend.min.js

frontend.min.js

1503 ms

PPS-Logo.svg

PPS-Logo.svg

851 ms

home1-rev-2.jpg

home1-rev-2.jpg

1144 ms

homebanner1.jpg

homebanner1.jpg

1633 ms

handling-banner-2.jpg

handling-banner-2.jpg

1438 ms

custom-banner.jpg

custom-banner.jpg

1202 ms

50Plus-Years-of-Experience.png

50Plus-Years-of-Experience.png

1404 ms

right-side-top-and-bottom-merge-shape.svg

right-side-top-and-bottom-merge-shape.svg

1090 ms

Transportation-img.jpg

Transportation-img.jpg

1570 ms

Warehousing-img.jpg

Warehousing-img.jpg

1388 ms

PPS-image.jpg

PPS-image.jpg

1699 ms

docs.jpg

docs.jpg

1876 ms

Custom-work.jpg

Custom-work.jpg

1634 ms

custum-solution.jpg

custum-solution.jpg

1685 ms

Bg-for-web.jpg

Bg-for-web.jpg

2052 ms

Prakash-Logo-with-Truck.png

Prakash-Logo-with-Truck.png

1875 ms

trucks-bg.jpg

trucks-bg.jpg

1756 ms

Prakash-Parcel-Services-white.svg

Prakash-Parcel-Services-white.svg

1824 ms

pxiEyp8kv8JHgFVrJJfedw.ttf

pxiEyp8kv8JHgFVrJJfedw.ttf

18 ms

pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLGT9Z1xlEA.ttf

pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLGT9Z1xlEA.ttf

28 ms

pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLDz8Z1xlEA.ttf

pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLDz8Z1xlEA.ttf

44 ms

pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLFj_Z1xlEA.ttf

pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLFj_Z1xlEA.ttf

54 ms

pxiGyp8kv8JHgFVrLPTucHtF.ttf

pxiGyp8kv8JHgFVrLPTucHtF.ttf

54 ms

pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLEj6Z1xlEA.ttf

pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLEj6Z1xlEA.ttf

56 ms

pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLCz7Z1xlEA.ttf

pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLCz7Z1xlEA.ttf

55 ms

pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLDD4Z1xlEA.ttf

pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLDD4Z1xlEA.ttf

56 ms

pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLBT5Z1xlEA.ttf

pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLBT5Z1xlEA.ttf

56 ms

rP2tp2ywxg089UriI5-g4vlH9VoD8CmcqZG40F9JadbnoEwAkJxRSW3z.ttf

rP2tp2ywxg089UriI5-g4vlH9VoD8CmcqZG40F9JadbnoEwAkJxRSW3z.ttf

56 ms

rP2tp2ywxg089UriI5-g4vlH9VoD8CmcqZG40F9JadbnoEwAopxRSW3z.ttf

rP2tp2ywxg089UriI5-g4vlH9VoD8CmcqZG40F9JadbnoEwAopxRSW3z.ttf

56 ms

rP2tp2ywxg089UriI5-g4vlH9VoD8CmcqZG40F9JadbnoEwARZtRSW3z.ttf

rP2tp2ywxg089UriI5-g4vlH9VoD8CmcqZG40F9JadbnoEwARZtRSW3z.ttf

57 ms

eicons.woff

eicons.woff

1834 ms

fa-solid-900.woff

fa-solid-900.woff

1967 ms

fa-solid-900.ttf

fa-solid-900.ttf

1934 ms

fa-regular-400.woff

fa-regular-400.woff

1931 ms

fa-regular-400.ttf

fa-regular-400.ttf

1981 ms

fa-brands-400.woff

fa-brands-400.woff

1989 ms

fa-brands-400.ttf

fa-brands-400.ttf

2040 ms

Accessibility Review

pps.in accessibility score

94

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Best Practices

pps.in best practices score

92

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

SEO Factors

pps.in SEO score

83

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have descriptive text

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

robots.txt is not valid

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Pps.in can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Pps.in main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

pps.in

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Pps. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: