Report Summary

  • 58

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    74% of other websites

  • 64

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 29% of websites

  • 67

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    24% of websites

  • 58

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    21% of websites

pr-t.ru

Проектирование спецтехники и специализированных автомобилей | «Проект-техника»

Page Load Speed

6 sec in total

First Response

476 ms

Resources Loaded

5 sec

Page Rendered

506 ms

pr-t.ru screenshot

About Website

Click here to check amazing Pr T content for Russia. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about pr-t.ru

Корпорация «Проект-техника» является производителем продукции военного назначения: машины технической помощи, мобильные госпитали, тыловые платформы и многое другое.

Visit pr-t.ru

Key Findings

We analyzed Pr-t.ru page load time and found that the first response time was 476 ms and then it took 5.5 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 75% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

pr-t.ru performance score

58

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value4.5 s

15/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value5.5 s

19/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value6.9 s

34/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value220 ms

87/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value5.3 s

72/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

pr-t.ru

476 ms

pr-t.ru

577 ms

css

77 ms

reset.css

135 ms

ui.css

270 ms

Our browser made a total of 71 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 62% of them (44 requests) were addressed to the original Pr-t.ru, 11% (8 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 7% (5 requests) were made to Api-maps.yandex.ru. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.9 sec) belongs to the original domain Pr-t.ru.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 145.9 kB (51%)

Content Size

286.3 kB

After Optimization

140.3 kB

In fact, the total size of Pr-t.ru main page is 286.3 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. Only a small number of websites need less resources to load. HTML takes 176.8 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-82%

Potential reduce by 145.7 kB

  • Original 176.8 kB
  • After minification 173.0 kB
  • After compression 31.1 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 145.7 kB or 82% of the original size.

JavaScript Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 224 B

  • Original 109.5 kB
  • After minification 109.5 kB
  • After compression 109.2 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 41 (73%)

Requests Now

56

After Optimization

15

The browser has sent 56 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Pr T. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 35 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 8 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Accessibility Review

pr-t.ru accessibility score

64

Accessibility Issues

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Buttons do not have an accessible name

Best practices

These items highlight common accessibility best practices.

Impact

Issue

High

[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.

Best Practices

pr-t.ru best practices score

67

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

SEO Factors

pr-t.ru SEO score

58

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    RU

  • Language Claimed

    RU

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Pr-t.ru can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that Russian is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Pr-t.ru main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Pr T. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: