1.4 sec in total
29 ms
832 ms
534 ms
Visit practically.io now to see the best up-to-date Practically content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about practically.io
Web Design & Development in Cheltenham. Experienced, digital specialists, with a history of creating amazing projects big & small for long-term client partners.
Visit practically.ioWe analyzed Practically.io page load time and found that the first response time was 29 ms and then it took 1.4 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 30% of websites can load faster.
practically.io performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value2.9 s
52/100
10%
Value9.7 s
0/100
25%
Value5.7 s
50/100
10%
Value450 ms
62/100
30%
Value1.319
0/100
15%
Value8.9 s
35/100
10%
29 ms
156 ms
20 ms
51 ms
65 ms
Our browser made a total of 64 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 30% of them (19 requests) were addressed to the original Practically.io, 34% (22 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 19% (12 requests) were made to Fonts.bunny.net. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (327 ms) relates to the external source B2209735.smushcdn.com.
Page size can be reduced by 257.3 kB (26%)
993.1 kB
735.8 kB
In fact, the total size of Practically.io main page is 993.1 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 65% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 497.3 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 257.2 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 257.2 kB or 85% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 0 B
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Practically images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 74 B
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.
Potential reduce by 58 B
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Practically.io has all CSS files already compressed.
Number of requests can be reduced by 12 (55%)
22
10
The browser has sent 22 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Practically. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 13 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.
practically.io
29 ms
practically.io
156 ms
jquery.min.js
20 ms
lottie-player.js
51 ms
lottie-interactivity.min.js
65 ms
smush-lazy-load.min.js
32 ms
b.min.js
118 ms
email-decode.min.js
31 ms
hustle-ui.min.js
49 ms
underscore.min.js
47 ms
688821b4701f4ec0c7087b67974542b6.js
37 ms
scripts.min.js
47 ms
2f04fca3629a88a953133ed9586e2d02.js
38 ms
vcd15cbe7772f49c399c6a5babf22c1241717689176015
50 ms
lottie-player.js
47 ms
lottie-interactivity.min.js
18 ms
gtm.js
229 ms
practically-540_white.png
327 ms
et-divi-dynamic-tb-28037-tb-251892-245125-late.css
51 ms
et-divi-dynamic-tb-28037-tb-251892-245125.css
155 ms
9dac5673d1c6a027df06b906a9130826.css
46 ms
DSC_0687-dark-2.jpg
247 ms
GCSEprepper-promo-video-mp4-image.jpg
186 ms
group_50.svg
157 ms
group_51.svg
156 ms
Obelisk-support-homepage-obelisksupport.com-longer.jpg
170 ms
memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsjr0B4uaVQ.woff
101 ms
memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsjr0B4uaVc.ttf
119 ms
memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsjZ0B4uaVQ.woff
119 ms
memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsjZ0B4uaVc.ttf
123 ms
memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsiH0B4uaVQ.woff
127 ms
memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsiH0B4uaVc.ttf
131 ms
memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsgH1x4uaVQ.woff
127 ms
memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsgH1x4uaVc.ttf
134 ms
memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsg-1x4uaVQ.woff
133 ms
memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsg-1x4uaVc.ttf
179 ms
open-sans-cyrillic-ext-700-normal.woff
109 ms
open-sans-vietnamese-700-normal.woff
115 ms
open-sans-latin-ext-700-normal.woff
113 ms
open-sans-greek-ext-700-normal.woff
109 ms
open-sans-cyrillic-700-normal.woff
112 ms
open-sans-hebrew-700-normal.woff
111 ms
open-sans-latin-700-normal.woff
121 ms
open-sans-greek-700-normal.woff
115 ms
memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgshZ1x4uaVQ.woff
178 ms
memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgshZ1x4uaVc.ttf
176 ms
S6u9w4BMUTPHh6UVSwaPHw.woff
176 ms
S6u9w4BMUTPHh6UVSwaPHA.ttf
182 ms
lato-latin-ext-700-normal.woff
119 ms
lato-latin-700-normal.woff
120 ms
S6u9w4BMUTPHh50XSwaPHw.woff
179 ms
S6u9w4BMUTPHh50XSwaPHA.ttf
178 ms
S6uyw4BMUTPHjxAwWA.woff
180 ms
S6uyw4BMUTPHjxAwWw.ttf
179 ms
lato-latin-ext-400-normal.woff
124 ms
lato-latin-400-normal.woff
124 ms
S6u9w4BMUTPHh7USSwaPHw.woff
181 ms
S6u9w4BMUTPHh7USSwaPHA.ttf
182 ms
S6u8w4BMUTPHh30AUi-s.woff
183 ms
S6u8w4BMUTPHh30AUi-v.ttf
181 ms
modules.woff
49 ms
fa-brands-400.woff
72 ms
fa-regular-400.woff
32 ms
fa-solid-900.woff
50 ms
practically.io accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have a discernible name
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
practically.io best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Page has valid source maps
practically.io SEO score
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Practically.io can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Practically.io main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
practically.io
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Practically. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: