Tools & Wizards About Us
precimake.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 12

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    25% of other websites

  • 96

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 88% of websites

  • 92

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    80% of websites

  • 83

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    46% of websites

precimake.com

My blog – Just another WordPress site

Page Load Speed

9.8 sec in total

First Response

499 ms

Resources Loaded

8.2 sec

Page Rendered

1.1 sec

precimake.com screenshot

About Website

Visit precimake.com now to see the best up-to-date Precimake content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about precimake.com

Visit precimake.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Precimake.com page load time and found that the first response time was 499 ms and then it took 9.3 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 85% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

precimake.com performance score

12

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value5.7 s

5/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value6.1 s

12/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value22.5 s

0/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value1,800 ms

9/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.289

41/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value22.2 s

1/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

precimake.com

499 ms

precimake.com

3305 ms

main.min.css

254 ms

css

34 ms

depicter-pre.css

502 ms

Our browser made a total of 45 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 84% of them (38 requests) were addressed to the original Precimake.com, 9% (4 requests) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com and 4% (2 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (3.3 sec) belongs to the original domain Precimake.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 280.1 kB (2%)

Content Size

17.8 MB

After Optimization

17.5 MB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Precimake.com main page is 17.8 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 45% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 17.1 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-86%

Potential reduce by 191.4 kB

  • Original 223.4 kB
  • After minification 221.2 kB
  • After compression 32.0 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 191.4 kB or 86% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 0 B

  • Original 17.1 MB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization.

JavaScript Optimization

-30%

Potential reduce by 88.3 kB

  • Original 296.8 kB
  • After minification 296.8 kB
  • After compression 208.5 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 88.3 kB or 30% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 419 B

  • Original 87.5 kB
  • After minification 87.5 kB
  • After compression 87.0 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Precimake.com has all CSS files already compressed.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 35 (85%)

Requests Now

41

After Optimization

6

  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 41 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Precimake. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 22 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 15 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

precimake.com

precimake.com

499 ms

precimake.com

precimake.com

3305 ms

main.min.css

main.min.css

254 ms

css

css

34 ms

depicter-pre.css

depicter-pre.css

502 ms

css

css

32 ms

grid.min.css

grid.min.css

737 ms

helper-parts.min.css

helper-parts.min.css

750 ms

main.min.css

main.min.css

761 ms

frontend-lite.min.css

frontend-lite.min.css

789 ms

swiper.min.css

swiper.min.css

771 ms

post-435.css

post-435.css

983 ms

all.min.css

all.min.css

1011 ms

v4-shims.min.css

v4-shims.min.css

1015 ms

post-526.css

post-526.css

1030 ms

css

css

35 ms

jquery.min.js

jquery.min.js

1069 ms

jquery-migrate.min.js

jquery-migrate.min.js

1232 ms

v4-shims.min.js

v4-shims.min.js

1284 ms

css

css

32 ms

frontend.min.js

frontend.min.js

1271 ms

depicter.js

depicter.js

1554 ms

morphext.min.js

morphext.min.js

1358 ms

welcomebar-front.js

welcomebar-front.js

1484 ms

detectmobilebrowser.js

detectmobilebrowser.js

1523 ms

mystickymenu.min.js

mystickymenu.min.js

1537 ms

dom-ready.min.js

dom-ready.min.js

1738 ms

main.js

main.js

1735 ms

core.min.js

core.min.js

1777 ms

main.min.js

main.min.js

1798 ms

jquery-numerator.min.js

jquery-numerator.min.js

1814 ms

webpack.runtime.min.js

webpack.runtime.min.js

1986 ms

frontend-modules.min.js

frontend-modules.min.js

2030 ms

waypoints.min.js

waypoints.min.js

2037 ms

frontend.min.js

frontend.min.js

2057 ms

hooks.min.js

hooks.min.js

2076 ms

i18n.min.js

i18n.min.js

2243 ms

elementor.js

elementor.js

2823 ms

scc-c2.min.js

scc-c2.min.js

3 ms

Precimake-Logo-3.png

Precimake-Logo-3.png

1001 ms

ENGINE-BELT-TENTIONER.png

ENGINE-BELT-TENTIONER.png

2753 ms

HUB-NEEDLE.png

HUB-NEEDLE.png

2999 ms

ROCKER-ARM.png

ROCKER-ARM.png

3089 ms

JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCuM73w5aX9-p7K4GLs.ttf

JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCuM73w5aX9-p7K4GLs.ttf

37 ms

JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCtr6Hw5aX9-p7K4GLs.ttf

JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCtr6Hw5aX9-p7K4GLs.ttf

36 ms

Accessibility Review

precimake.com accessibility score

96

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Best Practices

precimake.com best practices score

92

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Page has valid source maps

SEO Factors

precimake.com SEO score

83

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Precimake.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Precimake.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

precimake.com

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Precimake. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: