Tools & Wizards About Us
precisionscan.in screenshot

Report Summary

  • 27

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    46% of other websites

  • 81

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 51% of websites

  • 58

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    20% of websites

  • 79

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    40% of websites

precisionscan.in

Precision Scan - State-of-the-art diagnostic medical facility

Page Load Speed

6.9 sec in total

First Response

372 ms

Resources Loaded

5.7 sec

Page Rendered

770 ms

precisionscan.in screenshot

About Website

Welcome to precisionscan.in homepage info - get ready to check Precision Scan best content right away, or after learning these important things about precisionscan.in

Precision Scan aims to take a leap towards fighting illness with the skill of 3 talented radiologists as team leaders in professional matters & directors...

Visit precisionscan.in

Key Findings

We analyzed Precisionscan.in page load time and found that the first response time was 372 ms and then it took 6.5 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 80% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

precisionscan.in performance score

27

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value10.0 s

0/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value21.9 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value19.2 s

0/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value750 ms

39/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.026

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value19.8 s

2/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

precisionscan.in

372 ms

www.precisionscan.in

1924 ms

wp-emoji-release.min.js

457 ms

style.min.css

681 ms

tooltipster.css

355 ms

Our browser made a total of 106 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 82% of them (87 requests) were addressed to the original Precisionscan.in, 11% (12 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 3% (3 requests) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.9 sec) belongs to the original domain Precisionscan.in.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 1.7 MB (53%)

Content Size

3.2 MB

After Optimization

1.5 MB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Precisionscan.in main page is 3.2 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 65% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 1.1 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-82%

Potential reduce by 115.2 kB

  • Original 140.0 kB
  • After minification 136.9 kB
  • After compression 24.8 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 115.2 kB or 82% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-8%

Potential reduce by 88.0 kB

  • Original 1.1 MB
  • After minification 1.0 MB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Precision Scan images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-64%

Potential reduce by 583.7 kB

  • Original 905.5 kB
  • After minification 881.0 kB
  • After compression 321.8 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 583.7 kB or 64% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-88%

Potential reduce by 888.9 kB

  • Original 1.0 MB
  • After minification 975.5 kB
  • After compression 123.5 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Precisionscan.in needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 888.9 kB or 88% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 60 (68%)

Requests Now

88

After Optimization

28

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 88 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Precision Scan. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 36 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 26 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

precisionscan.in

precisionscan.in

372 ms

www.precisionscan.in

www.precisionscan.in

1924 ms

wp-emoji-release.min.js

wp-emoji-release.min.js

457 ms

style.min.css

style.min.css

681 ms

tooltipster.css

tooltipster.css

355 ms

tooltipster-light.css

tooltipster-light.css

368 ms

animations.css

animations.css

370 ms

booked.css

booked.css

485 ms

styles.css

styles.css

406 ms

settings.css

settings.css

573 ms

bootstrap.min.css

bootstrap.min.css

800 ms

font-awesome.min.css

font-awesome.min.css

571 ms

linear-fonts.css

linear-fonts.css

542 ms

owl.carousel.css

owl.carousel.css

531 ms

owl.theme.css

owl.theme.css

648 ms

magnific-popup.css

magnific-popup.css

672 ms

animate.min.css

animate.min.css

792 ms

effects.css

effects.css

697 ms

blog-style.css

blog-style.css

735 ms

style.css

style.css

784 ms

responsive.css

responsive.css

794 ms

style.css

style.css

822 ms

css

css

29 ms

js_composer.min.css

js_composer.min.css

1303 ms

jquery.min.js

jquery.min.js

964 ms

jquery-migrate.min.js

jquery-migrate.min.js

915 ms

anything-popup.js

anything-popup.js

224 ms

jquery.themepunch.tools.min.js

jquery.themepunch.tools.min.js

1173 ms

jquery.themepunch.revolution.min.js

jquery.themepunch.revolution.min.js

1046 ms

anything-popup.js

anything-popup.js

937 ms

css

css

24 ms

anything-popup.js

anything-popup.js

811 ms

animate.min.css

animate.min.css

952 ms

css

css

26 ms

prettyPhoto.min.css

prettyPhoto.min.css

855 ms

owl.min.css

owl.min.css

899 ms

core.min.js

core.min.js

935 ms

datepicker.min.js

datepicker.min.js

982 ms

spin.min.js

spin.min.js

1014 ms

spin.jquery.js

spin.jquery.js

1042 ms

jquery.tooltipster.min.js

jquery.tooltipster.min.js

1107 ms

js

js

83 ms

js

js

70 ms

functions.js

functions.js

1128 ms

index.js

index.js

1080 ms

index.js

index.js

1130 ms

functions.js

functions.js

1183 ms

comment-reply.min.js

comment-reply.min.js

1097 ms

bootstrap.min.js

bootstrap.min.js

1172 ms

owl.carousel.min.js

owl.carousel.min.js

1183 ms

jquery.magnific-popup.min.js

jquery.magnific-popup.min.js

1067 ms

jquery.stellar.min.js

jquery.stellar.min.js

1057 ms

jquery.mb.YTPlayer.min.js

jquery.mb.YTPlayer.min.js

1026 ms

jquery.waypoints.min.js

jquery.waypoints.min.js

1024 ms

jquery.counterup.min.js

jquery.counterup.min.js

1091 ms

wow.min.js

wow.min.js

1052 ms

scripts.js

scripts.js

1021 ms

js_composer_front.min.js

js_composer_front.min.js

1024 ms

waypoints.min.js

waypoints.min.js

963 ms

skrollr.min.js

skrollr.min.js

917 ms

jquery.prettyPhoto.min.js

jquery.prettyPhoto.min.js

1020 ms

owl.carousel.min.js

owl.carousel.min.js

1069 ms

imagesloaded.pkgd.min.js

imagesloaded.pkgd.min.js

1015 ms

underscore.min.js

underscore.min.js

1013 ms

vc_grid.min.js

vc_grid.min.js

919 ms

p_logov3.png

p_logov3.png

360 ms

First-Image-in-the-bannerv2.jpg

First-Image-in-the-bannerv2.jpg

766 ms

banner3.jpg

banner3.jpg

589 ms

GE-Optima-660.jpeg

GE-Optima-660.jpeg

762 ms

AllDoc.jpg

AllDoc.jpg

640 ms

quality.jpg

quality.jpg

640 ms

knee.jpg

knee.jpg

638 ms

cardiac.jpg

cardiac.jpg

696 ms

3rd-samsung-v8.jpg

3rd-samsung-v8.jpg

741 ms

Ultra_Doppler.jpg

Ultra_Doppler.jpg

742 ms

Mammogram.jpg

Mammogram.jpg

764 ms

Dexa.jpg

Dexa.jpg

821 ms

xray.jpg

xray.jpg

852 ms

Other_facilities.jpg

Other_facilities.jpg

871 ms

whyus.jpg

whyus.jpg

887 ms

reception-350x233.jpg

reception-350x233.jpg

875 ms

S6uyw4BMUTPHjx4wWw.ttf

S6uyw4BMUTPHjx4wWw.ttf

105 ms

S6uyw4BMUTPHjxAwWw.ttf

S6uyw4BMUTPHjxAwWw.ttf

105 ms

S6u9w4BMUTPHh7USSwaPHA.ttf

S6u9w4BMUTPHh7USSwaPHA.ttf

198 ms

S6u9w4BMUTPHh6UVSwaPHA.ttf

S6u9w4BMUTPHh6UVSwaPHA.ttf

219 ms

S6u9w4BMUTPHh50XSwaPHA.ttf

S6u9w4BMUTPHh50XSwaPHA.ttf

236 ms

1Ptxg8zYS_SKggPN4iEgvnHyvveLxVvaorCGPrQ.ttf

1Ptxg8zYS_SKggPN4iEgvnHyvveLxVvaorCGPrQ.ttf

237 ms

1Ptxg8zYS_SKggPN4iEgvnHyvveLxVvoorCGPrQ.ttf

1Ptxg8zYS_SKggPN4iEgvnHyvveLxVvoorCGPrQ.ttf

238 ms

1Ptxg8zYS_SKggPN4iEgvnHyvveLxVuEorCGPrQ.ttf

1Ptxg8zYS_SKggPN4iEgvnHyvveLxVuEorCGPrQ.ttf

238 ms

1Ptxg8zYS_SKggPN4iEgvnHyvveLxVsEpbCIPrQ.ttf

1Ptxg8zYS_SKggPN4iEgvnHyvveLxVsEpbCIPrQ.ttf

237 ms

1Ptxg8zYS_SKggPN4iEgvnHyvveLxVs9pbCGPrQ.ttf

1Ptxg8zYS_SKggPN4iEgvnHyvveLxVs9pbCGPrQ.ttf

237 ms

1Ptxg8zYS_SKggPN4iEgvnHyvveLxVtapbCGPrQ.ttf

1Ptxg8zYS_SKggPN4iEgvnHyvveLxVtapbCGPrQ.ttf

238 ms

mammography-350x233.jpg

mammography-350x233.jpg

875 ms

testi-bg.jpeg

testi-bg.jpeg

63 ms

contact.jpg

contact.jpg

56 ms

conf1-350x233.jpg

conf1-350x233.jpg

828 ms

waiting-350x233.jpg

waiting-350x233.jpg

866 ms

waiting2-350x233.jpg

waiting2-350x233.jpg

882 ms

fontawesome-webfont.woff

fontawesome-webfont.woff

797 ms

conf2-350x233.jpg

conf2-350x233.jpg

782 ms

Dr_Prashant-360x540-1.jpg

Dr_Prashant-360x540-1.jpg

832 ms

Dr_parimal.jpg

Dr_parimal.jpg

832 ms

Dr_Nilay-360x540-1.jpg

Dr_Nilay-360x540-1.jpg

893 ms

revolution.extension.slideanims.min.js

revolution.extension.slideanims.min.js

590 ms

revolution.extension.navigation.min.js

revolution.extension.navigation.min.js

607 ms

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsjZ0B4gaVc.ttf

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsjZ0B4gaVc.ttf

11 ms

Accessibility Review

precisionscan.in accessibility score

81

Accessibility Issues

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Buttons do not have an accessible name

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Best Practices

precisionscan.in best practices score

58

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Displays images with incorrect aspect ratio

High

Serves images with low resolution

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

High

Issues were logged in the Issues panel in Chrome Devtools

SEO Factors

precisionscan.in SEO score

79

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have descriptive text

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Precisionscan.in can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Precisionscan.in main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

precisionscan.in

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Precision Scan. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: