2.6 sec in total
964 ms
1.5 sec
184 ms
Click here to check amazing Preethi content for India. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about preethi.in
Visit preethi.inWe analyzed Preethi.in page load time and found that the first response time was 964 ms and then it took 1.7 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 30% of websites can load faster.
preethi.in performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value7.9 s
0/100
10%
Value14.7 s
0/100
25%
Value9.2 s
13/100
10%
Value400 ms
67/100
30%
Value1.079
2/100
15%
Value13.9 s
10/100
10%
964 ms
47 ms
54 ms
58 ms
55 ms
Our browser made a total of 64 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 94% of them (60 requests) were addressed to the original Preethi.in, 3% (2 requests) were made to Google-analytics.com and 2% (1 request) were made to Cdn.jsdelivr.net. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (964 ms) belongs to the original domain Preethi.in.
Page size can be reduced by 1.1 MB (20%)
5.3 MB
4.2 MB
In fact, the total size of Preethi.in main page is 5.3 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 55% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 4.4 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 36.4 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 4.7 kB, which is 11% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 36.4 kB or 84% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 324.0 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Preethi images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 587.2 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 587.2 kB or 82% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 124.2 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Preethi.in needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 124.2 kB or 84% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 32 (51%)
63
31
The browser has sent 63 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Preethi. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 22 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 12 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
preethi.in
964 ms
thickbox.css
47 ms
bjqs.css
54 ms
responsive-tabs.css
58 ms
component.css
55 ms
sequencejs-theme.modern-slide-in.css
61 ms
jquery.bxslider.css
61 ms
slicknav.css
71 ms
style.css
151 ms
logo.png
102 ms
categories_33eec_xs.jpg
78 ms
categories_966ba_xs.jpg
82 ms
categories_ffa49_xs.jpg
82 ms
categories_26561_xs.jpg
92 ms
categories_7e4c6_xs.jpg
105 ms
categories_18fc2_xs.jpg
109 ms
categories_d9d8b_xs.jpg
110 ms
categories_f1255_xs.jpg
115 ms
categories_9ea9a_xs.jpg
126 ms
categories_76cba_xs.jpg
131 ms
categories_491ec_xs.jpg
135 ms
categories_25f6a_xs.jpg
138 ms
categories_975c7_xs.jpg
139 ms
categories_b857d_xs.jpg
160 ms
banner-05.jpg
289 ms
jquery-latest.js
283 ms
jquery.sequence.js
205 ms
sequencejs-options.modern-slide-in.js
147 ms
jquery.validate.js
156 ms
jquery.custom.validations.js
161 ms
blockUI.js
170 ms
thickbox.js
179 ms
common.js
185 ms
bjqs-1.3.js
192 ms
banner-01.jpg
304 ms
banner-02.jpg
487 ms
hammer.min.js
10 ms
als_slider.css
212 ms
jquery.tosrus.all.css
210 ms
modernizr.custom.js
211 ms
grid.js
225 ms
fadeSlideShow.js
232 ms
jquery.carouFredSel-6.0.4-packed.js
252 ms
tabs.js
254 ms
jquery.bxslider.js
252 ms
jquery.slicknav.js
251 ms
jquery.als-1.7.js
367 ms
FlameViewportScale.js
255 ms
jquery.tosrus.min.all.js
254 ms
banner-03.jpg
405 ms
reset.css
206 ms
12-col-grid.css
213 ms
fanreel.js
183 ms
img_strip.png
72 ms
box_bg.jpg
124 ms
footer_logo.png
70 ms
up_arrow.png
70 ms
ld_logo.png
73 ms
flood%20relief.jpg
123 ms
lora-normal.woff
76 ms
MontserratRegular.woff
63 ms
analytics.js
48 ms
right.png
31 ms
collect
13 ms
preethi.in accessibility score
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Buttons do not have an accessible name
Links do not have a discernible name
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
preethi.in best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Serves images with low resolution
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Issues were logged in the Issues panel in Chrome Devtools
preethi.in SEO score
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
Links are not crawlable
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
N/A
N/A
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Preethi.in can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Unfortunately we cannot identify language used on the page (probably there is a mix of languages, too little text or something else) and no language is claimed in <html> or <meta> tags either. Our system also found out that Preethi.in main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
preethi.in
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Preethi. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: