3.1 sec in total
112 ms
2.6 sec
379 ms
Welcome to pregcc.com homepage info - get ready to check Pregcc best content right away, or after learning these important things about pregcc.com
Pregnancy Care Center is an abortion clinic alternative offering free pregnancy testing, medical services, information and support.
Visit pregcc.comWe analyzed Pregcc.com page load time and found that the first response time was 112 ms and then it took 3 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 55% of websites can load faster.
pregcc.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value3.1 s
45/100
10%
Value14.0 s
0/100
25%
Value8.9 s
15/100
10%
Value840 ms
34/100
30%
Value0.249
50/100
15%
Value11.8 s
17/100
10%
112 ms
1087 ms
140 ms
104 ms
92 ms
Our browser made a total of 84 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 92% of them (77 requests) were addressed to the original Pregcc.com, 4% (3 requests) were made to Googletagmanager.com and 2% (2 requests) were made to Google-analytics.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.1 sec) belongs to the original domain Pregcc.com.
Page size can be reduced by 249.0 kB (11%)
2.3 MB
2.1 MB
In fact, the total size of Pregcc.com main page is 2.3 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 65% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 1.7 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 93.5 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 93.5 kB or 81% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 70.7 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Pregcc images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 23.5 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.
Potential reduce by 61.3 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Pregcc.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 61.3 kB or 25% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 70 (89%)
79
9
The browser has sent 79 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Pregcc. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 68 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 4 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
pregcc.com
112 ms
pregcc.com
1087 ms
gtm.js
140 ms
js
104 ms
wp-emoji-release.min.js
92 ms
simple-banner.css
151 ms
27d71cc8d53562246d21687486181f24.min.css
323 ms
frontend-gtag.min.js
199 ms
jquery.min.js
251 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
199 ms
simple-banner.js
197 ms
style.min.css
244 ms
classic-themes.min.css
245 ms
wp-polyfill-inert.min.js
246 ms
regenerator-runtime.min.js
246 ms
wp-polyfill.min.js
251 ms
index.js
267 ms
awb-tabs-widget.js
271 ms
awb-vertical-menu-widget.js
274 ms
cssua.js
278 ms
modernizr.js
299 ms
fusion.js
310 ms
bootstrap.transition.js
314 ms
bootstrap.tooltip.js
436 ms
bootstrap.modal.js
437 ms
jquery.requestAnimationFrame.js
438 ms
jquery.easing.js
438 ms
jquery.fitvids.js
441 ms
jquery.flexslider.js
439 ms
jquery.ilightbox.js
443 ms
jquery.mousewheel.js
440 ms
jquery.placeholder.js
441 ms
jquery.fade.js
442 ms
fusion-equal-heights.js
443 ms
fusion-parallax.js
444 ms
fusion-video-general.js
443 ms
fusion-video-bg.js
468 ms
fusion-lightbox.js
466 ms
fusion-tooltip.js
466 ms
fusion-sharing-box.js
459 ms
jquery.sticky-kit.js
387 ms
analytics.js
73 ms
js
59 ms
fusion-youtube.js
329 ms
collect
51 ms
avada-general-footer.js
348 ms
avada-quantity.js
345 ms
avada-crossfade-images.js
343 ms
avada-select.js
297 ms
avada-contact-form-7.js
297 ms
avada-live-search.js
297 ms
fusion-alert.js
333 ms
awb-off-canvas.js
333 ms
fusion-flexslider.js
293 ms
fusion-animations.js
278 ms
fusion-column-legacy.js
311 ms
fusion-button.js
308 ms
jquery.textillate.js
305 ms
fusion-title.js
285 ms
fusion-testimonials.js
276 ms
fusion-modal.js
273 ms
embed
230 ms
fusion-content-boxes.js
150 ms
fusion-container.js
160 ms
avada-drop-down.js
179 ms
avada-to-top.js
180 ms
avada-header.js
188 ms
avada-menu.js
193 ms
bootstrap.scrollspy.js
184 ms
avada-scrollspy.js
203 ms
fusion-responsive-typography.js
211 ms
fusion-scroll-to-anchor.js
217 ms
fusion-general-global.js
226 ms
fusion-video.js
223 ms
fusion-column.js
228 ms
fa-regular-400.woff
315 ms
fa-solid-900.woff
293 ms
awb-icons.woff
290 ms
PCC-1x-2023.png
290 ms
PCC-footer2023.png
291 ms
js
125 ms
home-banner.jpg
556 ms
CTA-banner.jpg
195 ms
PCC-2x-2023.png
51 ms
pregcc.com accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
<frame> or <iframe> elements do not have a title
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
pregcc.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
pregcc.com SEO score
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Pregcc.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Pregcc.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
pregcc.com
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Pregcc. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: