6.2 sec in total
255 ms
5 sec
955 ms
Welcome to prepaidvergleich.com homepage info - get ready to check Prepaid Vergleich best content for Germany right away, or after learning these important things about prepaidvergleich.com
seit 2006 vergleichen die Experten von prepaidvergleich.com die GÜNSTIGEN & BESTEN Prepaid Tarife ✚ finde im seriösen Prepaid Vergleich ALLE Prepaid Karten mit Bewertungen & Sonderangeboten. ✚ MIT / O...
Visit prepaidvergleich.comWe analyzed Prepaidvergleich.com page load time and found that the first response time was 255 ms and then it took 6 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 75% of websites can load faster.
prepaidvergleich.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value3.1 s
45/100
10%
Value4.1 s
47/100
25%
Value5.4 s
56/100
10%
Value160 ms
94/100
30%
Value0
100/100
15%
Value4.3 s
85/100
10%
255 ms
752 ms
750 ms
35 ms
514 ms
Our browser made a total of 58 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 98% of them (57 requests) were addressed to the original Prepaidvergleich.com, 2% (1 request) were made to Google-analytics.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (2.2 sec) belongs to the original domain Prepaidvergleich.com.
Page size can be reduced by 488.0 kB (62%)
790.8 kB
302.8 kB
In fact, the total size of Prepaidvergleich.com main page is 790.8 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 25% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 274.3 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 124.7 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 124.7 kB or 83% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 20.3 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Prepaid Vergleich needs image optimization as it can save up to 20.3 kB or 12% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.
Potential reduce by 184.7 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 184.7 kB or 67% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 158.3 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Prepaidvergleich.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 158.3 kB or 82% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 41 (73%)
56
15
The browser has sent 56 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Prepaid Vergleich. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 16 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 7 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
prepaidvergleich.com
255 ms
www.prepaidvergleich.com
752 ms
pattern-farblos.png
750 ms
pvcom-logo.png
35 ms
welcome-box.png
514 ms
netz.gif
522 ms
bg_place.png
501 ms
congstar.gif
491 ms
star_default.png
39 ms
star.png
44 ms
i-blue.png
525 ms
ld.gif
1013 ms
netz1.png
1003 ms
i-grey.png
990 ms
arrow_green.png
1000 ms
klarmobil.gif
1006 ms
cross_red.png
746 ms
freenetmobile.gif
1250 ms
simyo.gif
1480 ms
netz3.png
1502 ms
whatsapp.gif
1498 ms
analytics.js
1014 ms
jquery-1.7.1.min.js
1046 ms
hover.js
1095 ms
jquery.sudoSlider.js
1493 ms
jquery.accordion.2.0.js
1498 ms
checkbox.js
1750 ms
jquery-ui-1.8.22.custom.min.js
1516 ms
all.js
1514 ms
jquery.multiselect.js
1591 ms
jquery.multiselect.filter.js
1495 ms
cookie.js
1976 ms
merkzettel_tarif.js
1512 ms
modernizr.custom.63321.js
1972 ms
jquery.dropdown.js
1995 ms
style5.css
1517 ms
styles.css
2027 ms
styles_2.css
2065 ms
jquery.multiselect.css
2219 ms
jquery.multiselect.filter.css
1955 ms
jquery-ui-1.8.21.custom.css
1952 ms
resp.css
2019 ms
ajax2.js
1977 ms
exitintent_standalone.js
1981 ms
lfooter.png
2111 ms
fb.png
2107 ms
tw.png
2043 ms
gp.png
2206 ms
ajax-loader.gif
1999 ms
collect
69 ms
flat.gif
492 ms
aufladung.gif
486 ms
extras.gif
493 ms
sort.gif
219 ms
question_icon.png
651 ms
arrow_icon.png
856 ms
select_1200.png
779 ms
exitintent_vodafone.png
483 ms
prepaidvergleich.com accessibility score
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Buttons do not have an accessible name
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Form elements do not have associated labels
Links do not have a discernible name
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
[id] attributes on active, focusable elements are not unique
Internationalization and localization
These are opportunities to improve the interpretation of your content by users in different locales.
Impact
Issue
<html> element does not have a [lang] attribute
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
prepaidvergleich.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
prepaidvergleich.com SEO score
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
DE
N/A
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Prepaidvergleich.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that German is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that Prepaidvergleich.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
prepaidvergleich.com
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Prepaid Vergleich. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: