1.5 sec in total
47 ms
1.2 sec
221 ms
Visit preprints.org now to see the best up-to-date Preprints content for United States and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about preprints.org
Preprints is a multidisciplinary preprint platform that accepts articles from all fields of science and technology, given that the preprint is scientifically sound and can be considered part of academ...
Visit preprints.orgWe analyzed Preprints.org page load time and found that the first response time was 47 ms and then it took 1.5 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 30% of websites can load faster.
preprints.org performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value2.8 s
57/100
10%
Value26.2 s
0/100
25%
Value11.8 s
4/100
10%
Value1,310 ms
18/100
30%
Value0
100/100
15%
Value25.3 s
0/100
10%
47 ms
327 ms
208 ms
56 ms
18 ms
Our browser made a total of 53 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 91% of them (48 requests) were addressed to the original Preprints.org, 4% (2 requests) were made to Cdnjs.cloudflare.com and 2% (1 request) were made to Script.crazyegg.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (559 ms) relates to the external source Widget.usersnap.com.
Page size can be reduced by 2.0 MB (45%)
4.5 MB
2.5 MB
In fact, the total size of Preprints.org main page is 4.5 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. Only a small number of websites need less resources to load. Images take 3.8 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 56.5 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 56.5 kB or 57% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 2.0 MB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Preprints needs image optimization as it can save up to 2.0 MB or 52% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.
Potential reduce by 9.8 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.
Potential reduce by 108 B
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Preprints.org has all CSS files already compressed.
Number of requests can be reduced by 32 (70%)
46
14
The browser has sent 46 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Preprints. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 26 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 8 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
preprints.org
47 ms
preprints.org
327 ms
www.preprints.org
208 ms
4951.js
56 ms
normalize.css
18 ms
foundation.css
34 ms
jquery-ui.min.css
31 ms
font-awesome.min.css
47 ms
select2.min.css
49 ms
jquery.tag-editor.css
51 ms
addon.css
53 ms
main.css
55 ms
uc.js
48 ms
MathJax.js
52 ms
email-decode.min.js
50 ms
clipboard.min.js
123 ms
js.cookie.min.js
143 ms
jquery-1.10.2.min.js
126 ms
modernizr.js
126 ms
foundation.min.js
132 ms
foundation.dropdown.js
134 ms
jquery.browser.min.js
133 ms
jquery-ui.min.js
134 ms
ajaxupload.js
135 ms
jquery.caret.min.js
135 ms
jquery.tag-editor.min.js
137 ms
feeds_runtime.js
136 ms
select2.min.js
137 ms
jquery.collection.js
138 ms
layer.js
140 ms
jquery.validate.min.js
139 ms
icon.js
345 ms
base.js
347 ms
tex-chtml-full.js
351 ms
fingerprint2.min.js
348 ms
TeX-AMS-MML_HTMLorMML.js
271 ms
169c7bab-0f94-4f76-877c-d8bf64ad7240
559 ms
sciprints_Logo.png
235 ms
Homepage_small3.png
337 ms
award_announcement_badge.png
322 ms
all_research_fields.svg
322 ms
high_visibility.svg
324 ms
permanent_archiving.svg
326 ms
article_level_metrics.svg
330 ms
citable.svg
327 ms
bg.png
330 ms
new
344 ms
paste.svg
339 ms
award_announcement_badge_small.png
338 ms
OpenSans-Regular.ttf
332 ms
OpenSans-Light.ttf
333 ms
OpenSans-Bold.ttf
332 ms
fontawesome-webfont.woff
184 ms
preprints.org accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Links do not have a discernible name
preprints.org best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Serves images with low resolution
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Browser errors were logged to the console
Missing source maps for large first-party JavaScript
preprints.org SEO score
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have descriptive text
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
Links are not crawlable
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Preprints.org can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Preprints.org main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
preprints.org
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Preprints. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: