Tools & Wizards About Us
pressa.net screenshot

Report Summary

  • 68

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    80% of other websites

  • 84

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 56% of websites

  • 75

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    35% of websites

  • 77

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    36% of websites

pressa.net

Компания

Page Load Speed

2.3 sec in total

First Response

514 ms

Resources Loaded

1.7 sec

Page Rendered

86 ms

pressa.net screenshot

About Website

Welcome to pressa.net homepage info - get ready to check Pressa best content right away, or after learning these important things about pressa.net

Visit pressa.net

Key Findings

We analyzed Pressa.net page load time and found that the first response time was 514 ms and then it took 1.8 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 35% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

pressa.net performance score

68

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value4.4 s

17/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value4.6 s

35/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value6.2 s

43/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value20 ms

100/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value4.4 s

83/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

pressa.net

514 ms

awesomplete.css

123 ms

joomla-alert.min.css

247 ms

bootstrap.min.css

376 ms

system-j4.min.css

246 ms

Our browser made a total of 32 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 84% of them (27 requests) were addressed to the original Pressa.net, 13% (4 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 3% (1 request) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (741 ms) belongs to the original domain Pressa.net.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 24.1 kB (15%)

Content Size

165.5 kB

After Optimization

141.4 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Pressa.net main page is 165.5 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 35% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 74.7 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-76%

Potential reduce by 16.3 kB

  • Original 21.6 kB
  • After minification 19.8 kB
  • After compression 5.2 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 16.3 kB or 76% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-12%

Potential reduce by 949 B

  • Original 7.9 kB
  • After minification 7.0 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Pressa needs image optimization as it can save up to 949 B or 12% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.

JavaScript Optimization

-8%

Potential reduce by 5.8 kB

  • Original 74.7 kB
  • After minification 74.7 kB
  • After compression 68.9 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

CSS Optimization

-2%

Potential reduce by 1.0 kB

  • Original 61.3 kB
  • After minification 61.3 kB
  • After compression 60.3 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Pressa.net has all CSS files already compressed.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 19 (79%)

Requests Now

24

After Optimization

5

  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 24 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Pressa. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 11 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 10 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

pressa.net

pressa.net

514 ms

awesomplete.css

awesomplete.css

123 ms

joomla-alert.min.css

joomla-alert.min.css

247 ms

bootstrap.min.css

bootstrap.min.css

376 ms

system-j4.min.css

system-j4.min.css

246 ms

choices.css

choices.css

247 ms

joomla-fontawesome.min.css

joomla-fontawesome.min.css

371 ms

template.css

template.css

248 ms

preset6.css

preset6.css

369 ms

custom.css

custom.css

369 ms

jquery.min.js

jquery.min.js

498 ms

jquery-noconflict.min.js

jquery-noconflict.min.js

369 ms

core.min.js

core.min.js

491 ms

finder-es5.min.js

finder-es5.min.js

492 ms

messages-es5.min.js

messages-es5.min.js

491 ms

awesomplete.min.js

awesomplete.min.js

494 ms

finder.min.js

finder.min.js

492 ms

messages.min.js

messages.min.js

612 ms

bootstrap.bundle.min.js

bootstrap.bundle.min.js

741 ms

main.js

main.js

614 ms

custom.js

custom.js

613 ms

css

css

32 ms

phone-c50.png

phone-c50.png

122 ms

whatsapp-50.png

whatsapp-50.png

128 ms

telegram-50.png

telegram-50.png

128 ms

LDIxapCSOBg7S-QT7p4GM-M.ttf

LDIxapCSOBg7S-QT7p4GM-M.ttf

52 ms

LDI2apCSOBg7S-QT7pb0EPOqeeI.ttf

LDI2apCSOBg7S-QT7pb0EPOqeeI.ttf

88 ms

LDI2apCSOBg7S-QT7pasEfOqeeI.ttf

LDI2apCSOBg7S-QT7pasEfOqeeI.ttf

99 ms

LDI2apCSOBg7S-QT7pa8FvOqeeI.ttf

LDI2apCSOBg7S-QT7pa8FvOqeeI.ttf

106 ms

fa-solid-900.woff

fa-solid-900.woff

390 ms

fa-regular-400.woff

fa-regular-400.woff

140 ms

fa-brands-400.woff

fa-brands-400.woff

382 ms

Accessibility Review

pressa.net accessibility score

84

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

[id] attributes on active, focusable elements are not unique

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Best Practices

pressa.net best practices score

75

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Serves images with low resolution

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

High

Page has valid source maps

SEO Factors

pressa.net SEO score

77

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Page is blocked from indexing

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    RU

  • Language Claimed

    RU

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Pressa.net can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that Russian is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Pressa.net main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

pressa.net

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Pressa. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: