3 sec in total
394 ms
2.5 sec
101 ms
Welcome to processpark.com homepage info - get ready to check Process Park best content right away, or after learning these important things about processpark.com
This is the official Web Site of ProcessPark. We are experts at ITIL® COBIT ISO20000 trainings, project management and consultancy.
Visit processpark.comWe analyzed Processpark.com page load time and found that the first response time was 394 ms and then it took 2.6 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 50% of websites can load faster.
processpark.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value4.4 s
16/100
10%
Value8.2 s
2/100
25%
Value6.1 s
45/100
10%
Value840 ms
34/100
30%
Value0.164
72/100
15%
Value10.1 s
26/100
10%
394 ms
205 ms
206 ms
408 ms
307 ms
Our browser made a total of 92 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 97% of them (89 requests) were addressed to the original Processpark.com, 2% (2 requests) were made to Google-analytics.com and 1% (1 request) were made to Pagead2.googlesyndication.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1 sec) belongs to the original domain Processpark.com.
Page size can be reduced by 330.6 kB (33%)
1.0 MB
677.0 kB
In fact, the total size of Processpark.com main page is 1.0 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 45% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 560.5 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 29.8 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 29.8 kB or 82% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 3.8 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Process Park images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 150.4 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 150.4 kB or 63% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 146.6 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Processpark.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 146.6 kB or 85% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 23 (26%)
89
66
The browser has sent 89 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Process Park. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 15 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 10 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
processpark.com
394 ms
skeleton.css
205 ms
base.css
206 ms
layout.css
408 ms
prettyPhoto.css
307 ms
shortcodes.css
207 ms
fontello.css
307 ms
responsive.css
309 ms
retina.css
308 ms
style.css
313 ms
jquery-1.5.1.min.js
511 ms
jquery.simplemodal.1.4.1.min.js
411 ms
jquery.easing.js
412 ms
portfolio.js
411 ms
fitvids.js
417 ms
jquery.tweet.js
508 ms
jquery.carouFredSel-6.1.0-packed.js
610 ms
plugins.js
509 ms
tooltips.js
519 ms
shortcodes.js
522 ms
jquery.prettyPhoto.js
610 ms
custom.js
617 ms
jquery.flexslider.js
617 ms
adsbygoogle.js
203 ms
basic.css
1005 ms
ga.js
430 ms
main_bg.png
106 ms
logo.png
104 ms
s5.jpg
306 ms
s4.jpg
207 ms
s_1.jpg
104 ms
s_2.jpg
307 ms
s_3.jpg
308 ms
dn_image.png
206 ms
egt.png
210 ms
coz.png
309 ms
cobit.jpg
309 ms
itil.jpg
316 ms
apmg_logo.jpg
408 ms
pecb_logo.jpg
409 ms
47_1.jpg
410 ms
28_1.jpg
411 ms
1_1.jpg
411 ms
2_1.jpg
420 ms
3_1.jpg
509 ms
29_1.jpg
511 ms
4_1.jpg
512 ms
30_1.jpg
513 ms
31_1.jpg
514 ms
32_1.jpg
525 ms
5_1.jpg
611 ms
6_1.jpg
612 ms
7_1.jpg
613 ms
8_1.jpg
615 ms
9_1.jpg
616 ms
10_1.jpg
640 ms
33_1.jpg
713 ms
11_1.jpg
713 ms
12_1.jpg
714 ms
13_1.jpg
715 ms
14_1.jpg
715 ms
fontelloea92.woff
799 ms
__utm.gif
13 ms
15_1.jpg
714 ms
16_1.jpg
714 ms
17_1.jpg
715 ms
18_1.jpg
614 ms
34_1.jpg
614 ms
46_1.jpg
710 ms
35_1.jpg
615 ms
19_1.jpg
616 ms
20_1.jpg
616 ms
36_1.jpg
614 ms
37_1.jpg
639 ms
38_1.jpg
706 ms
21_1.jpg
615 ms
22_1.jpg
616 ms
index.cgi
367 ms
39_1.jpg
613 ms
40_1.jpg
614 ms
41_1.jpg
642 ms
42_1.jpg
703 ms
43_1.jpg
614 ms
24_1.jpg
615 ms
44_1.jpg
615 ms
23_1.jpg
614 ms
25_1.jpg
645 ms
26_1.jpg
699 ms
27_1.jpg
615 ms
45_1.jpg
614 ms
button_bg.png
614 ms
arrows.png
612 ms
processpark.com accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
Internationalization and localization
These are opportunities to improve the interpretation of your content by users in different locales.
Impact
Issue
<html> element does not have a [lang] attribute
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have a discernible name
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
processpark.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Serves images with low resolution
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Page has valid source maps
processpark.com SEO score
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
Links are not crawlable
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Processpark.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Processpark.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
processpark.com
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Process Park. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: