Tools & Wizards About Us
processtechnique.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 53

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    70% of other websites

  • 65

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 30% of websites

  • 58

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    20% of websites

  • 80

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    42% of websites

processtechnique.com

Process Technique | PF Regulator, Power factor control, PF relay, Reactive power, BELUK, APFCR, Power capacitors from processtechnique.com

Page Load Speed

1.6 sec in total

First Response

185 ms

Resources Loaded

1.3 sec

Page Rendered

119 ms

processtechnique.com screenshot

About Website

Welcome to processtechnique.com homepage info - get ready to check Process Technique best content right away, or after learning these important things about processtechnique.com

Process Technique PF Regulator, Power factor control, PF relay, Reactive power, BELUK, APFCR, Power capacitors

Visit processtechnique.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Processtechnique.com page load time and found that the first response time was 185 ms and then it took 1.4 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 30% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

processtechnique.com performance score

53

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value4.1 s

21/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value4.3 s

41/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value5.8 s

50/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value100 ms

98/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.394

26/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value11.4 s

19/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

processtechnique.com

185 ms

processtechnique.com

310 ms

bootstrap.min.css

233 ms

font-awesome.min.css

229 ms

animate.css

287 ms

Our browser made a total of 55 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 93% of them (51 requests) were addressed to the original Processtechnique.com, 4% (2 requests) were made to Google-analytics.com and 2% (1 request) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (435 ms) belongs to the original domain Processtechnique.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 669.0 kB (33%)

Content Size

2.0 MB

After Optimization

1.4 MB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Processtechnique.com main page is 2.0 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 45% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 1.5 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-83%

Potential reduce by 24.6 kB

  • Original 29.6 kB
  • After minification 21.7 kB
  • After compression 5.0 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 8.0 kB, which is 27% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 24.6 kB or 83% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-19%

Potential reduce by 274.9 kB

  • Original 1.5 MB
  • After minification 1.2 MB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Process Technique needs image optimization as it can save up to 274.9 kB or 19% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.

JavaScript Optimization

-61%

Potential reduce by 176.9 kB

  • Original 288.4 kB
  • After minification 285.5 kB
  • After compression 111.5 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 176.9 kB or 61% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-85%

Potential reduce by 192.7 kB

  • Original 225.9 kB
  • After minification 201.2 kB
  • After compression 33.2 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Processtechnique.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 192.7 kB or 85% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 13 (25%)

Requests Now

51

After Optimization

38

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 51 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Process Technique. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 9 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 6 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

processtechnique.com

processtechnique.com

185 ms

processtechnique.com

processtechnique.com

310 ms

bootstrap.min.css

bootstrap.min.css

233 ms

font-awesome.min.css

font-awesome.min.css

229 ms

animate.css

animate.css

287 ms

main.css

main.css

231 ms

style.css

style.css

173 ms

jquery.js

jquery.js

297 ms

wowslider.js

wowslider.js

290 ms

script.js

script.js

286 ms

jquery.js

jquery.js

293 ms

bootstrap.min.js

bootstrap.min.js

235 ms

jquery.prettyPhoto.js

jquery.prettyPhoto.js

293 ms

main.js

main.js

294 ms

css

css

20 ms

Energy.jpg

Energy.jpg

122 ms

Matering.jpg

Matering.jpg

228 ms

Power.jpg

Power.jpg

233 ms

PTL.jpg

PTL.jpg

151 ms

Surge.jpg

Surge.jpg

265 ms

power1.png

power1.png

96 ms

surge1.png

surge1.png

152 ms

energy1.png

energy1.png

178 ms

Power_Factor_Regulators.png

Power_Factor_Regulators.png

216 ms

LV_Power_Capacitors.png

LV_Power_Capacitors.png

217 ms

Thyristor_Switches.png

Thyristor_Switches.png

233 ms

Detuned_Reactors.png

Detuned_Reactors.png

265 ms

Cap-Duty_Contactors.png

Cap-Duty_Contactors.png

266 ms

Power_Protection.png

Power_Protection.png

289 ms

SignalLine_protection.png

SignalLine_protection.png

290 ms

Process_Surge_protection.png

Process_Surge_protection.png

291 ms

Rail_CCTV.png

Rail_CCTV.png

322 ms

Panel_mounted_metering.png

Panel_mounted_metering.png

321 ms

Portable_power.png

Portable_power.png

322 ms

Network.png

Network.png

343 ms

Beml.png

Beml.png

346 ms

Chettinad.png

Chettinad.png

348 ms

clients02.png

clients02.png

378 ms

Ford.png

Ford.png

378 ms

Holcim.png

Holcim.png

379 ms

Infosys.png

Infosys.png

400 ms

Iskcon.png

Iskcon.png

403 ms

JSW.png

JSW.png

405 ms

Mahindra.png

Mahindra.png

434 ms

TATA.png

TATA.png

435 ms

Wipro.png

Wipro.png

435 ms

arrows.png

arrows.png

421 ms

pause.png

pause.png

398 ms

fontawesome-webfont.woff

fontawesome-webfont.woff

396 ms

glyphicons-halflings-regular.woff

glyphicons-halflings-regular.woff

424 ms

analytics.js

analytics.js

18 ms

header.html

header.html

413 ms

footer.html

footer.html

412 ms

collect

collect

25 ms

js

js

60 ms

Accessibility Review

processtechnique.com accessibility score

65

Accessibility Issues

ARIA

These are opportunities to improve the usage of ARIA in your application which may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

ARIA input fields do not have accessible names

High

Elements with an ARIA [role] that require children to contain a specific [role] are missing some or all of those required children.

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Tables and lists

These are opportunities to improve the experience of reading tabular or list data using assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Lists do not contain only <li> elements and script supporting elements (<script> and <template>).

High

List items (<li>) are not contained within <ul> or <ol> parent elements.

Best Practices

processtechnique.com best practices score

58

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Serves images with low resolution

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

High

Issues were logged in the Issues panel in Chrome Devtools

SEO Factors

processtechnique.com SEO score

80

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have descriptive text

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Processtechnique.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Processtechnique.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

processtechnique.com

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Process Technique. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: