10.3 sec in total
533 ms
8.7 sec
1.1 sec
Welcome to productionlogisticsforum.com homepage info - get ready to check Production Logistics Forum best content right away, or after learning these important things about productionlogisticsforum.com
Blog
Visit productionlogisticsforum.comWe analyzed Productionlogisticsforum.com page load time and found that the first response time was 533 ms and then it took 9.7 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 90% of websites can load faster.
productionlogisticsforum.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value6.2 s
3/100
10%
Value6.5 s
9/100
25%
Value13.7 s
2/100
10%
Value4,410 ms
0/100
30%
Value0
100/100
15%
Value23.8 s
1/100
10%
533 ms
1724 ms
236 ms
476 ms
913 ms
Our browser made a total of 62 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 68% of them (42 requests) were addressed to the original Productionlogisticsforum.com, 16% (10 requests) were made to Youtube.com and 6% (4 requests) were made to Jnn-pa.googleapis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (2.1 sec) belongs to the original domain Productionlogisticsforum.com.
Page size can be reduced by 91.6 kB (8%)
1.2 MB
1.1 MB
In fact, the total size of Productionlogisticsforum.com main page is 1.2 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. Only a small number of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 451.4 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 51.0 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 51.0 kB or 73% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 0 B
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Production Logistics Forum images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 20.1 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.
Potential reduce by 20.5 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Productionlogisticsforum.com has all CSS files already compressed.
Number of requests can be reduced by 43 (80%)
54
11
The browser has sent 54 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Production Logistics Forum. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 27 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 13 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
productionlogisticsforum.com
533 ms
www.productionlogisticsforum.com
1724 ms
all.min.css
236 ms
simple-line-icons.min.css
476 ms
style.min.css
913 ms
frontend.min.css
933 ms
general.min.css
715 ms
jquery.min.js
712 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
719 ms
post-53.css
728 ms
elementor-icons.min.css
1013 ms
swiper.min.css
1015 ms
post-14.css
1016 ms
global.css
1017 ms
css
32 ms
imagesloaded.min.js
1340 ms
theme.min.js
1341 ms
drop-down-mobile-menu.min.js
1343 ms
drop-down-search.min.js
1530 ms
magnific-popup.min.js
1534 ms
ow-lightbox.min.js
1537 ms
flickity.pkgd.min.js
1838 ms
ow-slider.min.js
1837 ms
scroll-effect.min.js
1838 ms
scroll-top.min.js
1836 ms
select.min.js
1836 ms
general.min.js
1836 ms
webpack.runtime.min.js
2124 ms
frontend-modules.min.js
2125 ms
waypoints.min.js
2125 ms
core.min.js
2129 ms
frontend.min.js
2128 ms
freight-forwarder-and-shipping-agent.jpeg
562 ms
IoPjreDbJmI
202 ms
KVjEnir7oe0
129 ms
air-freight-forwarding.jpeg
858 ms
Pet-Relocation-Guide.jpg
858 ms
Simple-Line-Icons.ttf
1328 ms
www-player.css
9 ms
www-embed-player.js
32 ms
base.js
72 ms
www-player.css
326 ms
www-embed-player.js
355 ms
base.js
361 ms
ad_status.js
517 ms
mK0xWDPcwcXQhJC0zos_TWAHQXo6uV6sCgJ_cLtDow8.js
465 ms
embed.js
372 ms
freight-forwarder-and-shipping-agent.jpeg
696 ms
rail-freight.jpeg
958 ms
Freight-Forwarder-vs-Shipping-Agent.jpeg
1303 ms
warehouse-space.jpeg
1304 ms
sea-freight-forwarding.jpeg
1085 ms
KFOmCnqEu92Fr1Mu4mxPKTU1Kg.ttf
165 ms
KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmEU9fBBc9AMP6lQ.ttf
186 ms
embed.js
48 ms
air-freight-forwarding.jpeg
1220 ms
Pet-Relocation-Guide.jpg
736 ms
id
45 ms
Create
212 ms
Create
311 ms
GenerateIT
27 ms
GenerateIT
26 ms
productionlogisticsforum.com accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
<frame> or <iframe> elements do not have a title
productionlogisticsforum.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Page has valid source maps
productionlogisticsforum.com SEO score
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Productionlogisticsforum.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Productionlogisticsforum.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
productionlogisticsforum.com
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Production Logistics Forum. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: