Tools & Wizards About Us
productreviewonweb.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 52

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    69% of other websites

  • 76

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 42% of websites

  • 62

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    24% of websites

  • 79

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    40% of websites

productreviewonweb.com

Product review on web - Digital and physical product reviews

Page Load Speed

9.3 sec in total

First Response

3 sec

Resources Loaded

5.8 sec

Page Rendered

382 ms

productreviewonweb.com screenshot

About Website

Visit productreviewonweb.com now to see the best up-to-date Product Review On Web content for Bangladesh and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about productreviewonweb.com

Product review on web is dedicated to producing the best and most affordable product and service reviews in-depth for your convenience.

Visit productreviewonweb.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Productreviewonweb.com page load time and found that the first response time was 3 sec and then it took 6.2 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 80% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

productreviewonweb.com performance score

52

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value3.1 s

45/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value5.1 s

26/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value3.5 s

89/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value700 ms

43/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value8.5 s

38/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

productreviewonweb.com

3033 ms

8d86e0802a073f81d994242308d16f1c.css

1163 ms

styles.css

22 ms

publicCSS.css

1160 ms

blocksCSS.css

1170 ms

Our browser made a total of 53 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 57% of them (30 requests) were addressed to the original Productreviewonweb.com, 13% (7 requests) were made to Youtube.com and 11% (6 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (3 sec) belongs to the original domain Productreviewonweb.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 450.1 kB (68%)

Content Size

665.0 kB

After Optimization

214.9 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Productreviewonweb.com main page is 665.0 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 65% of websites need less resources to load. CSS take 453.4 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-81%

Potential reduce by 112.6 kB

  • Original 138.8 kB
  • After minification 138.8 kB
  • After compression 26.2 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 112.6 kB or 81% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-9%

Potential reduce by 985 B

  • Original 11.3 kB
  • After minification 10.3 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Product Review On Web images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-40%

Potential reduce by 24.6 kB

  • Original 61.5 kB
  • After minification 61.5 kB
  • After compression 36.9 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 24.6 kB or 40% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-69%

Potential reduce by 311.9 kB

  • Original 453.4 kB
  • After minification 453.2 kB
  • After compression 141.5 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Productreviewonweb.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 311.9 kB or 69% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 37 (80%)

Requests Now

46

After Optimization

9

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 46 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Product Review On Web. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 23 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 16 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

productreviewonweb.com

productreviewonweb.com

3033 ms

8d86e0802a073f81d994242308d16f1c.css

8d86e0802a073f81d994242308d16f1c.css

1163 ms

styles.css

styles.css

22 ms

publicCSS.css

publicCSS.css

1160 ms

blocksCSS.css

blocksCSS.css

1170 ms

frontend-lite.min.css

frontend-lite.min.css

1173 ms

post-608.css

post-608.css

1158 ms

style.min.css

style.min.css

1335 ms

global.css

global.css

1363 ms

post-606.css

post-606.css

1171 ms

style.min.css

style.min.css

1523 ms

EcHjqEwFxe4

EcHjqEwFxe4

127 ms

4e905WdgNNE

4e905WdgNNE

605 ms

Fib%20%281%29.gif

Fib%20%281%29.gif

72 ms

blog.css

blog.css

1115 ms

mailpoet-public.a09bafc3.css

mailpoet-public.a09bafc3.css

1115 ms

css

css

62 ms

css

css

76 ms

css

css

78 ms

email-decode.min.js

email-decode.min.js

966 ms

owl.carousel.js

owl.carousel.js

966 ms

imagesloaded.min.js

imagesloaded.min.js

1336 ms

masonry.min.js

masonry.min.js

1928 ms

ultp.min.js

ultp.min.js

1934 ms

index.js

index.js

1930 ms

index.js

index.js

1130 ms

regenerator-runtime.min.js

regenerator-runtime.min.js

1926 ms

wp-polyfill.min.js

wp-polyfill.min.js

1933 ms

events.js

events.js

1933 ms

publicJS.js

publicJS.js

2411 ms

postsTab.js

postsTab.js

2028 ms

main.js

main.js

2032 ms

cookieConsent.js

cookieConsent.js

2466 ms

progressBar.js

progressBar.js

2453 ms

public.30f9470e.js

public.30f9470e.js

2691 ms

v652eace1692a40cfa3763df669d7439c1639079717194

v652eace1692a40cfa3763df669d7439c1639079717194

85 ms

my-logo-3.png

my-logo-3.png

2462 ms

www-player.css

www-player.css

31 ms

www-embed-player.js

www-embed-player.js

28 ms

base.js

base.js

114 ms

fetch-polyfill.js

fetch-polyfill.js

15 ms

ad_status.js

ad_status.js

750 ms

PJkulU-G08v7JckZMeNSZvqVIBPCjlLmLXUvorg-pEg.js

PJkulU-G08v7JckZMeNSZvqVIBPCjlLmLXUvorg-pEg.js

608 ms

embed.js

embed.js

217 ms

id

id

209 ms

KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmEU9fBBc9.ttf

KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmEU9fBBc9.ttf

170 ms

KFOmCnqEu92Fr1Mu4mxP.ttf

KFOmCnqEu92Fr1Mu4mxP.ttf

377 ms

Create

Create

587 ms

Create

Create

691 ms

JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCtr6Hw5aX8.ttf

JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCtr6Hw5aX8.ttf

523 ms

JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCuM73w5aX8.ttf

JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCuM73w5aX8.ttf

527 ms

pxiEyp8kv8JHgFVrJJfedw.ttf

pxiEyp8kv8JHgFVrJJfedw.ttf

621 ms

pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLCz7Z1xlEA.ttf

pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLCz7Z1xlEA.ttf

619 ms

Accessibility Review

productreviewonweb.com accessibility score

76

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

<frame> or <iframe> elements do not have a title

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Best Practices

productreviewonweb.com best practices score

62

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Serves images with low resolution

General

Impact

Issue

High

Registers an unload listener

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

High

Issues were logged in the Issues panel in Chrome Devtools

SEO Factors

productreviewonweb.com SEO score

79

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Productreviewonweb.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Productreviewonweb.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

productreviewonweb.com

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Product Review On Web. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: