3.6 sec in total
538 ms
2.6 sec
433 ms
Visit produktvergleich.de now to see the best up-to-date Produktvergleich content for Germany and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about produktvergleich.de
Produktvergleich.de ✅ von Verbrauchern ✅ Finden Sie das richtige Produkt zum günstigsten Preis ✅ nur zertifizierte Online-Shops ✅ Jeden Tag aktualisiert ✅
Visit produktvergleich.deWe analyzed Produktvergleich.de page load time and found that the first response time was 538 ms and then it took 3.1 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 55% of websites can load faster.
produktvergleich.de performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value6.7 s
2/100
10%
Value7.0 s
6/100
25%
Value7.4 s
28/100
10%
Value90 ms
99/100
30%
Value0.01
100/100
15%
Value10.9 s
21/100
10%
538 ms
294 ms
304 ms
299 ms
296 ms
Our browser made a total of 64 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 95% of them (61 requests) were addressed to the original Produktvergleich.de, 3% (2 requests) were made to Google-analytics.com and 2% (1 request) were made to S3.amazonaws.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1 sec) belongs to the original domain Produktvergleich.de.
Page size can be reduced by 386.9 kB (31%)
1.2 MB
862.9 kB
In fact, the total size of Produktvergleich.de main page is 1.2 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 30% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 851.7 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 24.8 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 24.8 kB or 82% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 119.6 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Produktvergleich needs image optimization as it can save up to 119.6 kB or 14% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.
Potential reduce by 205.3 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 205.3 kB or 63% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 37.2 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Produktvergleich.de needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 37.2 kB or 85% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 18 (29%)
62
44
The browser has sent 62 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Produktvergleich. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 10 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 4 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
produktvergleich.de
538 ms
reset.css
294 ms
layout.css
304 ms
style.css
299 ms
prettyPhoto.css
296 ms
jquery-1.4.2.min.js
419 ms
cufon-yui.js
309 ms
cufon-replace.js
414 ms
silvs.js
620 ms
bgstretcher.js
416 ms
loopedcarousel.js
431 ms
jquery.prettyPhoto.js
416 ms
jquery.anythingslider.js
510 ms
slider.js
512 ms
cookieconsent.latest.min.js
54 ms
top.png
138 ms
logo.png
140 ms
bg_input.gif
137 ms
button.gif
138 ms
icon1.gif
140 ms
icon2.gif
132 ms
icon3.gif
228 ms
bg_menu.gif
242 ms
bg_box_white.gif
230 ms
bg_box1.gif
250 ms
geld-sparen.jpg
445 ms
teaser_baufinanzierung.jpg
417 ms
teaser_tagesgeld.jpg
428 ms
versicherung_vergleich_teaser.jpg
556 ms
tail.gif
375 ms
bg_box_1.png
404 ms
bg_box2.png
441 ms
berufsunfaehigkeitsversicherung.jpg
522 ms
risikolebensversicherung.jpg
523 ms
kfzversicherung.jpg
523 ms
haftpflichtversicherung.jpg
538 ms
hausratversicherung.jpg
552 ms
rentenversicherung.jpg
618 ms
autokredit.jpg
617 ms
ratenkredit.jpg
619 ms
girokonto.jpg
634 ms
stromvergleich.jpg
658 ms
oelvergleich.jpg
655 ms
gasvergleich.jpg
711 ms
next.png
718 ms
prev.png
713 ms
bg_top.png
731 ms
istock_000014048592xsmall.jpg
758 ms
istock_000011937469xsmall.jpg
767 ms
istock_000018296811xsmall.jpg
769 ms
ga.js
87 ms
istock_000019990878xsmall.jpg
685 ms
istock_000018764656xsmall.jpg
702 ms
istock_000015889548xsmall.jpg
701 ms
istock_000000531251xsmall.jpg
732 ms
istock_000017539959xsmall.jpg
740 ms
istock_000020548085xsmall.jpg
773 ms
__utm.gif
12 ms
istock_000015873677xsmall.jpg
685 ms
bg_1.png
705 ms
produktvergleich_bg1.jpg
1044 ms
but.gif
639 ms
bg_cont.png.html
330 ms
arrows.png.html
368 ms
produktvergleich.de accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
produktvergleich.de best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Browser errors were logged to the console
produktvergleich.de SEO score
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
Links are not crawlable
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
DE
N/A
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Produktvergleich.de can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that German is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that Produktvergleich.de main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
produktvergleich.de
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Produktvergleich. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: