Tools & Wizards About Us
produktvergleich.de screenshot

Report Summary

  • 54

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    71% of other websites

  • 85

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 58% of websites

  • 83

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    55% of websites

  • 93

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    83% of websites

produktvergleich.de

✅ Produktvergleich.de » Shopping-Produkte aller Art vergleichen

Page Load Speed

2.9 sec in total

First Response

199 ms

Resources Loaded

2.4 sec

Page Rendered

264 ms

produktvergleich.de screenshot

About Website

Visit produktvergleich.de now to see the best up-to-date Produktvergleich content for Germany and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about produktvergleich.de

Produktvergleich.de ✅ von Verbrauchern ✅ Finden Sie das richtige Produkt zum günstigsten Preis ✅ nur zertifizierte Online-Shops ✅ Jeden Tag aktualisiert ✅

Visit produktvergleich.de

Key Findings

We analyzed Produktvergleich.de page load time and found that the first response time was 199 ms and then it took 2.7 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 50% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

produktvergleich.de performance score

54

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value6.5 s

2/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value6.5 s

9/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value7.3 s

28/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value40 ms

100/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.01

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value8.5 s

37/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

produktvergleich.de

199 ms

www.produktvergleich.de

815 ms

wp-emoji-release.min.js

97 ms

style.min.css

286 ms

pfb.css

285 ms

Our browser made a total of 56 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 73% of them (41 requests) were addressed to the original Produktvergleich.de, 9% (5 requests) were made to Use.fontawesome.com and 9% (5 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (820 ms) belongs to the original domain Produktvergleich.de.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 620.1 kB (49%)

Content Size

1.3 MB

After Optimization

648.4 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Produktvergleich.de main page is 1.3 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 50% of websites need less resources to load. CSS take 449.3 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-77%

Potential reduce by 42.2 kB

  • Original 54.4 kB
  • After minification 53.7 kB
  • After compression 12.3 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 42.2 kB or 77% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 0 B

  • Original 433.5 kB
  • After minification 433.5 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Produktvergleich images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-65%

Potential reduce by 214.2 kB

  • Original 331.3 kB
  • After minification 327.6 kB
  • After compression 117.1 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 214.2 kB or 65% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-81%

Potential reduce by 363.7 kB

  • Original 449.3 kB
  • After minification 422.9 kB
  • After compression 85.6 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Produktvergleich.de needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 363.7 kB or 81% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 25 (83%)

Requests Now

30

After Optimization

5

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 30 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Produktvergleich. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 14 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 13 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

produktvergleich.de

produktvergleich.de

199 ms

www.produktvergleich.de

www.produktvergleich.de

815 ms

wp-emoji-release.min.js

wp-emoji-release.min.js

97 ms

style.min.css

style.min.css

286 ms

pfb.css

pfb.css

285 ms

style.css

style.css

289 ms

screen.min.css

screen.min.css

289 ms

bootstrap.min.css

bootstrap.min.css

573 ms

style.css

style.css

477 ms

font-awesome.min.css

font-awesome.min.css

569 ms

css

css

40 ms

css

css

57 ms

style.css

style.css

472 ms

lightbox.css

lightbox.css

376 ms

all.css

all.css

48 ms

v4-shims.css

v4-shims.css

87 ms

jquery.min.js

jquery.min.js

579 ms

jquery-migrate.min.js

jquery-migrate.min.js

471 ms

js

js

64 ms

bootstrap.min.js

bootstrap.min.js

577 ms

pfb.js

pfb.js

576 ms

jquery.beefup.min.js

jquery.beefup.min.js

576 ms

front.min.js

front.min.js

662 ms

scripts.js

scripts.js

750 ms

select2.min.js

select2.min.js

756 ms

comment-reply.min.js

comment-reply.min.js

662 ms

lightbox.js

lightbox.js

664 ms

wp-embed.min.js

wp-embed.min.js

664 ms

Produktvergleich.de-Familie.jpg

Produktvergleich.de-Familie.jpg

820 ms

BRAIN_Logo-Produktvergleich.de_161213_RGB_Wei%C3%9F.svg

BRAIN_Logo-Produktvergleich.de_161213_RGB_Wei%C3%9F.svg

160 ms

analytics.js

analytics.js

21 ms

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsjZ0B4gaVQUwaEQXjM.woff

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsjZ0B4gaVQUwaEQXjM.woff

115 ms

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsjZ0B4uaVQUwaEQXjN_mQ.woff

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsjZ0B4uaVQUwaEQXjN_mQ.woff

114 ms

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsjZ0B4vaVQUwaEQXjN_mQ.woff

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsjZ0B4vaVQUwaEQXjN_mQ.woff

190 ms

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsjZ0B5OaVQUwaEQXjN_mQ.woff

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsjZ0B5OaVQUwaEQXjN_mQ.woff

194 ms

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsjZ0B5caVQUwaEQXjN_mQ.woff

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsjZ0B5caVQUwaEQXjN_mQ.woff

193 ms

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsjZ0B4iaVQUwaEQXjN_mQ.woff

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsjZ0B4iaVQUwaEQXjN_mQ.woff

204 ms

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsjZ0B4jaVQUwaEQXjN_mQ.woff

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsjZ0B4jaVQUwaEQXjN_mQ.woff

204 ms

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsjZ0B4saVQUwaEQXjN_mQ.woff

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsjZ0B4saVQUwaEQXjN_mQ.woff

284 ms

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsjZ0B4kaVQUwaEQXjN_mQ.woff

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsjZ0B4kaVQUwaEQXjN_mQ.woff

287 ms

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsjZ0B4taVQUwaEQXjN_mQ.woff

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsjZ0B4taVQUwaEQXjN_mQ.woff

288 ms

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsjZ0B4gaVQ.woff

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsjZ0B4gaVQ.woff

33 ms

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsgH1x4gaVQ.woff

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsgH1x4gaVQ.woff

34 ms

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgshZ1x4gaVQ.woff

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgshZ1x4gaVQ.woff

51 ms

fa-solid-900.woff

fa-solid-900.woff

33 ms

fa-solid-900.woff

fa-solid-900.woff

393 ms

fa-regular-400.woff

fa-regular-400.woff

68 ms

fa-regular-400.woff

fa-regular-400.woff

296 ms

5aU69_a8oxmIdGl4AjGwgDI.woff

5aU69_a8oxmIdGl4AjGwgDI.woff

377 ms

5aU69_a8oxmIdGd4AjGwgDJm_A.woff

5aU69_a8oxmIdGd4AjGwgDJm_A.woff

380 ms

5aU69_a8oxmIdGh4AjGwgDJm_A.woff

5aU69_a8oxmIdGh4AjGwgDJm_A.woff

380 ms

5aU69_a8oxmIdGl4Ag.woff

5aU69_a8oxmIdGl4Ag.woff

50 ms

5aU19_a8oxmIfLZcERySiw.woff

5aU19_a8oxmIfLZcERySiw.woff

50 ms

fa-brands-400.woff

fa-brands-400.woff

49 ms

fa-brands-400.woff

fa-brands-400.woff

478 ms

collect

collect

21 ms

Accessibility Review

produktvergleich.de accessibility score

85

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Best practices

These items highlight common accessibility best practices.

Impact

Issue

High

[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.

Best Practices

produktvergleich.de best practices score

83

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

SEO Factors

produktvergleich.de SEO score

93

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    DE

  • Language Claimed

    DE

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Produktvergleich.de can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that German is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Produktvergleich.de main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

produktvergleich.de

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Produktvergleich. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: