Tools & Wizards About Us
profiledesign.co.uk screenshot

Report Summary

  • 58

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    74% of other websites

  • 86

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 61% of websites

  • 92

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    80% of websites

  • 100

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    94% of websites

profiledesign.co.uk

Graphic Design | Hertford | London | Profile Design

Page Load Speed

2.6 sec in total

First Response

79 ms

Resources Loaded

1.9 sec

Page Rendered

633 ms

profiledesign.co.uk screenshot

About Website

Visit profiledesign.co.uk now to see the best up-to-date Profile Design content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about profiledesign.co.uk

Small but highly creative graphic design agency Profile Design for logo design, brand management, exhibition, retail, events, POS and design for print. Excellent and friendly!

Visit profiledesign.co.uk

Key Findings

We analyzed Profiledesign.co.uk page load time and found that the first response time was 79 ms and then it took 2.6 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 50% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

profiledesign.co.uk performance score

58

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value2.8 s

57/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value8.0 s

2/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value5.3 s

58/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value140 ms

95/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.011

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value10.0 s

26/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

www.profiledesign.co.uk

79 ms

minified.js

34 ms

focus-within-polyfill.js

30 ms

polyfill.min.js

1029 ms

thunderbolt-commons.c1d8ed1c.bundle.min.js

53 ms

Our browser made a total of 31 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 3% of them (1 request) were addressed to the original Profiledesign.co.uk, 48% (15 requests) were made to Static.parastorage.com and 42% (13 requests) were made to Static.wixstatic.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1 sec) relates to the external source Polyfill-fastly.io.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 520.2 kB (36%)

Content Size

1.4 MB

After Optimization

908.7 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript

In fact, the total size of Profiledesign.co.uk main page is 1.4 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 50% of websites need less resources to load. HTML takes 583.7 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-81%

Potential reduce by 472.1 kB

  • Original 583.7 kB
  • After minification 582.0 kB
  • After compression 111.6 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 472.1 kB or 81% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 0 B

  • Original 541.1 kB
  • After minification 541.1 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Profile Design images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-16%

Potential reduce by 48.1 kB

  • Original 304.1 kB
  • After minification 304.1 kB
  • After compression 256.0 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 48.1 kB or 16% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 10 (42%)

Requests Now

24

After Optimization

14

  • Images
  • JavaScript

The browser has sent 24 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Profile Design. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 11 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

www.profiledesign.co.uk

www.profiledesign.co.uk

79 ms

minified.js

minified.js

34 ms

focus-within-polyfill.js

focus-within-polyfill.js

30 ms

polyfill.min.js

polyfill.min.js

1029 ms

thunderbolt-commons.c1d8ed1c.bundle.min.js

thunderbolt-commons.c1d8ed1c.bundle.min.js

53 ms

main.1adb5ce4.bundle.min.js

main.1adb5ce4.bundle.min.js

53 ms

main.renderer.1d21f023.bundle.min.js

main.renderer.1d21f023.bundle.min.js

17 ms

lodash.min.js

lodash.min.js

52 ms

react.production.min.js

react.production.min.js

18 ms

react-dom.production.min.js

react-dom.production.min.js

53 ms

siteTags.bundle.min.js

siteTags.bundle.min.js

52 ms

489cb2_7ae94e311f5b4ef4a4356a1b2125b3f1~mv2.gif

489cb2_7ae94e311f5b4ef4a4356a1b2125b3f1~mv2.gif

157 ms

489cb2_08c37987626c445780dcaf7c945f2fb4~mv2_d_3840_2400_s_4_2.jpg

489cb2_08c37987626c445780dcaf7c945f2fb4~mv2_d_3840_2400_s_4_2.jpg

157 ms

489cb2_69fb59231a8f4832af4612f48516215f~mv2.jpg

489cb2_69fb59231a8f4832af4612f48516215f~mv2.jpg

166 ms

489cb2_04cb88a750994d939b7cd1f000101923~mv2_d_2280_2280_s_2.jpg

489cb2_04cb88a750994d939b7cd1f000101923~mv2_d_2280_2280_s_2.jpg

165 ms

489cb2_19fd913673014555903af730480c9495~mv2.jpg

489cb2_19fd913673014555903af730480c9495~mv2.jpg

166 ms

489cb2_0752333d15ec4d8ab0a9554286e422c7~mv2_d_4058_2705_s_4_2.jpg

489cb2_0752333d15ec4d8ab0a9554286e422c7~mv2_d_4058_2705_s_4_2.jpg

165 ms

489cb2_7d98035cbcd34c3696619c6e769e3214~mv2_d_2400_7559_s_4_2.jpg

489cb2_7d98035cbcd34c3696619c6e769e3214~mv2_d_2400_7559_s_4_2.jpg

166 ms

489cb2_97e84078f2f24576acbddf0f98e7d8e6~mv2.jpg

489cb2_97e84078f2f24576acbddf0f98e7d8e6~mv2.jpg

182 ms

489cb2_4efbb3482cf74e0fa93e1cf1154fddeb~mv2.jpg

489cb2_4efbb3482cf74e0fa93e1cf1154fddeb~mv2.jpg

184 ms

489cb2_00ea1d80ec57466d84a997c552b31c01~mv2.jpg

489cb2_00ea1d80ec57466d84a997c552b31c01~mv2.jpg

186 ms

489cb2_95a8ec8080f743ddb74659a3992ce177~mv2.jpg

489cb2_95a8ec8080f743ddb74659a3992ce177~mv2.jpg

184 ms

489cb2_1989fed8fc8947dfbc730ad2618f81fe~mv2.jpg

489cb2_1989fed8fc8947dfbc730ad2618f81fe~mv2.jpg

185 ms

489cb2_85544fcccfee4a3c9f7ccbbd1ca964ff~mv2.jpg

489cb2_85544fcccfee4a3c9f7ccbbd1ca964ff~mv2.jpg

182 ms

bundle.min.js

bundle.min.js

124 ms

c5749443-93da-4592-b794-42f28d62ef72.woff

c5749443-93da-4592-b794-42f28d62ef72.woff

12 ms

03805817-4611-4dbc-8c65-0f73031c3973.woff

03805817-4611-4dbc-8c65-0f73031c3973.woff

11 ms

80c34ad2-27c2-4d99-90fa-985fd64ab81a.woff

80c34ad2-27c2-4d99-90fa-985fd64ab81a.woff

12 ms

4021a3b9-f782-438b-aeb4-c008109a8b64.woff

4021a3b9-f782-438b-aeb4-c008109a8b64.woff

11 ms

b56b944e-bbe0-4450-a241-de2125d3e682.woff

b56b944e-bbe0-4450-a241-de2125d3e682.woff

12 ms

6f8d1983-4d34-4fa4-9110-988f6c495757.woff

6f8d1983-4d34-4fa4-9110-988f6c495757.woff

12 ms

Accessibility Review

profiledesign.co.uk accessibility score

86

Accessibility Issues

ARIA

These are opportunities to improve the usage of ARIA in your application which may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

button, link, and menuitem elements do not have accessible names.

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Buttons do not have an accessible name

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Best Practices

profiledesign.co.uk best practices score

92

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Page has valid source maps

SEO Factors

profiledesign.co.uk SEO score

100

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Profiledesign.co.uk can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Profiledesign.co.uk main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

profiledesign.co.uk

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Profile Design. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: