Report Summary

  • 52

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    69% of other websites

  • 100

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 97% of websites

  • 92

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    80% of websites

  • 100

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    94% of websites

profiles.eco

The .eco community | .eco profiles

Page Load Speed

1.5 sec in total

First Response

99 ms

Resources Loaded

808 ms

Page Rendered

588 ms

profiles.eco screenshot

About Website

Welcome to profiles.eco homepage info - get ready to check Profiles best content right away, or after learning these important things about profiles.eco

Home of the .eco community. A .eco profile showcases the sustainability commitments of all .eco domain holders.

Visit profiles.eco

Key Findings

We analyzed Profiles.eco page load time and found that the first response time was 99 ms and then it took 1.4 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 30% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

profiles.eco performance score

52

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value2.3 s

76/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value3.4 s

67/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value6.8 s

35/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value750 ms

39/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.156

74/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value11.9 s

17/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

profiles.eco

99 ms

profiles.eco

179 ms

bootstrap.min.css

166 ms

main.css

195 ms

enforce

190 ms

Our browser made a total of 30 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 10% of them (3 requests) were addressed to the original Profiles.eco, 57% (17 requests) were made to Cdn.profiles.eco and 27% (8 requests) were made to Doteco.report-uri.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (498 ms) relates to the external source Trust.profiles.eco.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 83.0 kB (53%)

Content Size

155.1 kB

After Optimization

72.1 kB

In fact, the total size of Profiles.eco main page is 155.1 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 30% of websites need less resources to load. HTML takes 114.4 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-69%

Potential reduce by 79.2 kB

  • Original 114.4 kB
  • After minification 111.4 kB
  • After compression 35.2 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 79.2 kB or 69% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-42%

Potential reduce by 3.7 kB

  • Original 8.8 kB
  • After minification 5.1 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Profiles needs image optimization as it can save up to 3.7 kB or 42% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.

CSS Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 115 B

  • Original 31.9 kB
  • After minification 31.9 kB
  • After compression 31.8 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Profiles.eco has all CSS files already compressed.

Requests Breakdown

We found no issues to fix!

Requests Now

17

After Optimization

17

The browser has sent 17 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Profiles. According to our analytics all requests are already optimized.

Accessibility Review

profiles.eco accessibility score

100

Accessibility Issues

Best Practices

profiles.eco best practices score

92

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Page has valid source maps

SEO Factors

profiles.eco SEO score

100

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Profiles.eco can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Profiles.eco main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Profiles. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: