3.4 sec in total
43 ms
1.4 sec
2 sec
Visit profiletree.com now to see the best up-to-date Profile Tree content for India and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about profiletree.com
Web Design & Website Development Agency with the best SEO expertise supported with digital marketing, video production, content marketing & digital training
Visit profiletree.comWe analyzed Profiletree.com page load time and found that the first response time was 43 ms and then it took 3.4 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 60% of websites can load faster.
profiletree.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value2.7 s
62/100
10%
Value3.6 s
61/100
25%
Value2.7 s
97/100
10%
Value120 ms
97/100
30%
Value0
100/100
15%
Value3.9 s
88/100
10%
43 ms
179 ms
76 ms
39 ms
153 ms
Our browser made a total of 50 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 86% of them (43 requests) were addressed to the original Profiletree.com, 4% (2 requests) were made to Googletagmanager.com and 4% (2 requests) were made to Secure.gravatar.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (922 ms) belongs to the original domain Profiletree.com.
Page size can be reduced by 171.1 kB (3%)
5.9 MB
5.8 MB
In fact, the total size of Profiletree.com main page is 5.9 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 75% of websites need less resources to load and that’s why Accessify’s recommendations for optimization and resource minification can be helpful for this project. Images take 5.7 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 80.4 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 80.4 kB or 69% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 87.7 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Profile Tree images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 1.8 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.
Potential reduce by 1.2 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Profiletree.com has all CSS files already compressed.
Number of requests can be reduced by 16 (39%)
41
25
The browser has sent 41 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Profile Tree. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 8 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 10 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
profiletree.com
43 ms
profiletree.com
179 ms
gtm.js
76 ms
script.js
39 ms
style.css
153 ms
card.css
131 ms
author.css
72 ms
swiper-bundle.min.css
141 ms
jquery.js
71 ms
jquery-migrate.js
72 ms
js
100 ms
lasso-performance.min.js
19 ms
hero.css
219 ms
about.css
217 ms
image-card.css
217 ms
projects.css
238 ms
service.css
286 ms
cta.css
287 ms
swiper-bundle.min.js
220 ms
navigation-home.js
296 ms
hero.js
325 ms
log
445 ms
fb65e6b7f2cee9cc71d83d4c4a8ef32f
31 ms
ProfileTree-Agency-Logo.svg
34 ms
pt-video-thumb.jpg
483 ms
ProfileTrees-Awards.png
171 ms
Screenshot-2024-04-12-at-12.09.22.png
206 ms
Screenshot-2024-04-12-at-12.34.18.png
147 ms
Screenshot-2024-04-12-at-11.59.37.png
494 ms
Screenshot-2024-04-12-at-11.51.03.png
149 ms
Screenshot-2024-04-12-at-11.02.50.png
157 ms
antrim-and-newtownabbey.png
260 ms
bryson.png
277 ms
newry-and-mourne.png
288 ms
national-trust.png
321 ms
department-of-children-logo.png
382 ms
Maus-Homepage.jpg
415 ms
KIX-Homepage.jpg
406 ms
ProfileTree-Semrush.jpg
439 ms
ProfileTree-Analytics.png
542 ms
ProfileTree-YouTube.png
922 ms
Default_Who_Will_Win_The_Digital_Presence_Euros_1-1024x767.jpg
439 ms
side-view-hand-holding-smartphone.webp
583 ms
Open-Banking-Apps-Opportunities-and-Innovations-1024x576.jpeg
473 ms
ca48c136297d69be7b8d6ebdc8f12c51
11 ms
Manrope-Medium.woff
497 ms
Manrope-SemiBold.woff
625 ms
Manrope-ExtraBold.woff
541 ms
TomatoGrotesk-SemiBold.woff
499 ms
TomatoGrotesk-Regular.woff
583 ms
profiletree.com accessibility score
profiletree.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Displays images with incorrect aspect ratio
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
profiletree.com SEO score
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Profiletree.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Profiletree.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
profiletree.com
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Profile Tree. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: