17.6 sec in total
2.6 sec
14.8 sec
217 ms
Welcome to profingeo.ru homepage info - get ready to check Profingeo best content right away, or after learning these important things about profingeo.ru
ООО «Профинжгео» - комплекс услуг: геологические изыскания, геодезические изыскания, экологические изыскания, геологоразведочные работы
Visit profingeo.ruWe analyzed Profingeo.ru page load time and found that the first response time was 2.6 sec and then it took 15 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 90% of websites can load faster.
profingeo.ru performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value3.3 s
41/100
10%
Value5.5 s
19/100
25%
Value5.9 s
47/100
10%
Value1,400 ms
16/100
30%
Value0.137
79/100
15%
Value5.8 s
67/100
10%
2647 ms
151 ms
361 ms
78 ms
274 ms
Our browser made a total of 70 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 64% of them (45 requests) were addressed to the original Profingeo.ru, 13% (9 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 11% (8 requests) were made to C0.wp.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (11.4 sec) relates to the external source I2.wp.com.
Page size can be reduced by 118.7 kB (5%)
2.2 MB
2.1 MB
In fact, the total size of Profingeo.ru main page is 2.2 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 60% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 1.9 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 30.8 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 30.8 kB or 81% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 646 B
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Profingeo images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 5.2 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.
Potential reduce by 82.1 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Profingeo.ru needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 82.1 kB or 43% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 50 (89%)
56
6
The browser has sent 56 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Profingeo. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 30 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 22 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
profingeo.ru
2647 ms
wp-emoji-release.min.js
151 ms
bootstrap.min.css
361 ms
style.min.css
78 ms
styles.css
274 ms
font-icomoon.css
385 ms
chosen.css
279 ms
font-awesome.min.css
285 ms
shop.css
279 ms
blog.css
377 ms
menu.css
387 ms
style.css
504 ms
elementor-icons.min.css
396 ms
animations.min.css
449 ms
frontend.min.css
486 ms
global.css
476 ms
post-56.css
502 ms
style.css
528 ms
owl.carousel.css
554 ms
responsive.css
584 ms
custom.css
587 ms
css
146 ms
jetpack.css
113 ms
jquery.js
122 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
84 ms
jv.js
636 ms
bootstrap.min.js
639 ms
retina.min.js
660 ms
owl.carousel.min.js
693 ms
photon.min.js
119 ms
jquery.form.min.js
716 ms
scripts.js
769 ms
devicepx-jetpack.js
128 ms
oss-function.js
765 ms
jquery.masonry.min.js
778 ms
jquery.imagesloaded.js
803 ms
parallax-plugin.js
803 ms
jquery.bpopup.min.js
808 ms
jquery.sticky-kit.min.js
810 ms
jquery.zoom.js
815 ms
menu.js
885 ms
lazy-images.min.js
94 ms
wp-embed.min.js
107 ms
position.min.js
117 ms
e-202239.js
125 ms
script.js
916 ms
maxmegamenu.js
815 ms
frontend-modules.min.js
690 ms
dialog.min.js
698 ms
waypoints.min.js
700 ms
swiper.min.js
847 ms
frontend.min.js
683 ms
1533668087_006a43_fad2f47cb0d648d99c1ed2463dba841emv2.jpg
1998 ms
IMG_20180807_140715.jpg
11390 ms
IMG_20181213_111845.jpg
11424 ms
body-bg-16.png
312 ms
logo.jpg
4019 ms
%D0%98%D0%BD%D0%B6%D0%B5%D0%BD%D0%B5%D1%80%D0%BD%D0%BE-%D0%B3%D0%B5%D0%BE%D0%B4%D0%B5%D0%B7%D0%B8%D1%87%D0%B5%D1%81%D0%BA%D0%B8%D0%B5-%D0%B8%D0%B7%D1%8B%D1%81%D0%BA%D0%B0%D0%BD%D0%B8%D1%8F.jpeg
1492 ms
1.jpg
10348 ms
ieVi2ZhZI2eCN5jzbjEETS9weq8-33mZGCAYatlecyU.ttf
103 ms
ieVl2ZhZI2eCN5jzbjEETS9weq8-19a7CAk6YvM.ttf
160 ms
ieVi2ZhZI2eCN5jzbjEETS9weq8-32meGCAYatlecyU.ttf
181 ms
fontawesome-webfont.woff
492 ms
KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmWUlfABc9AMP6lQ.ttf
136 ms
KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmYUtfABc9AMP6lQ.ttf
134 ms
KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmEU9fABc9AMP6lQ.ttf
134 ms
KFOmCnqEu92Fr1Mu5mxPKTU1Kg.ttf
124 ms
KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmSU5fABc9AMP6lQ.ttf
155 ms
KFOkCnqEu92Fr1MmgVxMIzcXKMny.ttf
189 ms
frontend-msie.min.css
110 ms
profingeo.ru accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
profingeo.ru best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
profingeo.ru SEO score
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
RU
RU
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Profingeo.ru can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that Russian is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Profingeo.ru main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
profingeo.ru
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Profingeo. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: