4.5 sec in total
648 ms
3.7 sec
131 ms
Click here to check amazing Profoto content for United States. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about profoto.com
Profoto doesn’t do complicated. Our photography lighting products are quick and easy to set up and use. That’s why the world’s best photographers love them.
Visit profoto.comWe analyzed Profoto.com page load time and found that the first response time was 648 ms and then it took 3.8 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 60% of websites can load faster.
profoto.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value3.3 s
41/100
10%
Value14.5 s
0/100
25%
Value6.1 s
44/100
10%
Value2,620 ms
4/100
30%
Value0
100/100
15%
Value16.9 s
5/100
10%
648 ms
117 ms
315 ms
210 ms
216 ms
Our browser made a total of 95 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 91% of them (86 requests) were addressed to the original Profoto.com, 3% (3 requests) were made to S7.addthis.com and 2% (2 requests) were made to Google-analytics.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (894 ms) belongs to the original domain Profoto.com.
Page size can be reduced by 1.6 MB (69%)
2.4 MB
737.3 kB
In fact, the total size of Profoto.com main page is 2.4 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 60% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 1.4 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 114.9 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 114.9 kB or 77% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 15.7 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Profoto images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 990.0 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 990.0 kB or 70% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 524.0 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Profoto.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 524.0 kB or 86% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 72 (78%)
92
20
The browser has sent 92 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Profoto. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 33 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 34 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
648 ms
uikit.min.css
117 ms
widgetkit-ec5c1bd5.css
315 ms
jcemediabox.css
210 ms
style.css
216 ms
modal.css
220 ms
bootstrap.css
340 ms
jquery.min.js
358 ms
jquery-noconflict.js
312 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
326 ms
widgetkit-a3f9036d.js
327 ms
jcemediabox.js
520 ms
mootools-core.js
525 ms
core.js
428 ms
mootools-more.js
663 ms
modal.js
451 ms
bootstrap.min.js
454 ms
base.css
544 ms
layout.css
563 ms
menus.css
565 ms
modules.css
622 ms
tools.css
623 ms
system.css
640 ms
extensions.css
709 ms
masonrygallery.css
710 ms
multicolumnform.css
725 ms
custom.css
728 ms
animations.css
746 ms
grey.css
768 ms
profotosansregular.css
785 ms
profotosansbold.css
784 ms
profotosansregular.css
827 ms
style.css
829 ms
responsive.css
853 ms
print.css
876 ms
jquery.fancybox.css
894 ms
addthis_widget.js
13 ms
profotosans-regular.css
893 ms
profotosans-bold.css
819 ms
warp.js
736 ms
responsive.js
755 ms
accordionmenu.js
777 ms
dropdownmenu.js
693 ms
template.js
694 ms
jquery.fancybox.pack.js
724 ms
jquery.cookie.js
723 ms
jquery.hoverIntent.minified.js
723 ms
profoto-custom.js
724 ms
jquery.h5validate.js
700 ms
profoto-apsis.js
679 ms
masonry.pkgd.min.js
695 ms
modernizr.custom.js
626 ms
AnimOnScroll.js
642 ms
classie.js
668 ms
imagesloaded.js
676 ms
picturefill.js
677 ms
lightbox.js
629 ms
mediaelement-and-player.js
637 ms
spotlight.js
649 ms
layout.css
613 ms
menus.css
638 ms
tools.css
642 ms
system.css
631 ms
system.css
623 ms
system-all.css
650 ms
print.css
551 ms
searchbox_magnifier.png
495 ms
NEW-Profoto-Main-Banner-970x370px-02.jpg
546 ms
NEW-Profoto-Footer-Banner-317x185px-02.jpg
495 ms
NEW-Profoto-Footer-Banner-317x185px-014.jpg
496 ms
NEW-Profoto-Footer-Banner-317x185px-03.jpg
493 ms
gtm.js
490 ms
menubar.png
484 ms
menu_dropdown_level1.png
484 ms
menu_dropdown_level1_parent.png
484 ms
menu_line_footer.png
529 ms
Profoto_Logo_Tagline_Black_RGB.svg
529 ms
ProfotoSans-Regular.woff
512 ms
slideshow.js
189 ms
popup.html
168 ms
tooltip.html
167 ms
300lo.json
128 ms
close.png
142 ms
blank.gif
143 ms
menu_dropdown_level3.png
123 ms
Profoto_Logo_Tagline_Black_RGB_214x56.png
586 ms
ProfotoSans-Bold.woff
120 ms
sh.7c7179124ea24ac6ba46caac.html
34 ms
analytics.js
30 ms
NEW-Profoto-Main-Banner-970x370px-04.jpg
224 ms
NEW-Profoto-Main-Banner-970x370px-0.jpg
216 ms
layers.3643cb2e25fb91c29386.js
17 ms
collect
64 ms
collect
75 ms
js
22 ms
profoto.com accessibility score
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have a discernible name
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
profoto.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Missing source maps for large first-party JavaScript
profoto.com SEO score
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have descriptive text
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Profoto.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Profoto.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
profoto.com
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Profoto. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: