Tools & Wizards About Us
programmingback.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 0

    Performance

  • 0

    Accessibility

  • 0

    Best Practices

  • 0

    SEO

programmingback.com

Page Load Speed

2.4 sec in total

First Response

383 ms

Resources Loaded

1.8 sec

Page Rendered

181 ms

programmingback.com screenshot

About Website

Click here to check amazing Programmingback content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about programmingback.com

Visit programmingback.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Programmingback.com page load time and found that the first response time was 383 ms and then it took 2 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 35% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

programmingback.com performance score

0

Network Requests Diagram

programmingback.com

383 ms

home.css

125 ms

jquery-1.10.2.js

11 ms

jquery-ui.js

12 ms

jquery.js

618 ms

Our browser made a total of 10 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 70% of them (7 requests) were addressed to the original Programmingback.com, 20% (2 requests) were made to Code.jquery.com and 10% (1 request) were made to Cdnjs.cloudflare.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (762 ms) belongs to the original domain Programmingback.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 344.8 kB (44%)

Content Size

781.4 kB

After Optimization

436.5 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Programmingback.com main page is 781.4 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 50% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 430.0 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-57%

Potential reduce by 1.9 kB

  • Original 3.3 kB
  • After minification 3.1 kB
  • After compression 1.4 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 1.9 kB or 57% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-11%

Potential reduce by 45.7 kB

  • Original 430.0 kB
  • After minification 384.3 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Programmingback needs image optimization as it can save up to 45.7 kB or 11% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.

JavaScript Optimization

-86%

Potential reduce by 294.0 kB

  • Original 343.8 kB
  • After minification 171.2 kB
  • After compression 49.8 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 294.0 kB or 86% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-77%

Potential reduce by 3.2 kB

  • Original 4.2 kB
  • After minification 3.0 kB
  • After compression 981 B

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Programmingback.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 3.2 kB or 77% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 5 (63%)

Requests Now

8

After Optimization

3

  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 8 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Programmingback. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 6 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

programmingback.com

programmingback.com

383 ms

home.css

home.css

125 ms

jquery-1.10.2.js

jquery-1.10.2.js

11 ms

jquery-ui.js

jquery-ui.js

12 ms

jquery.js

jquery.js

618 ms

jqueryTransform.js

jqueryTransform.js

238 ms

home.js

home.js

224 ms

modernizr.js

modernizr.js

11 ms

back3.png

back3.png

762 ms

Preloader_2.gif

Preloader_2.gif

120 ms

SEO Factors

programmingback.com SEO score

0

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    N/A

  • Language Claimed

    N/A

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Programmingback.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Unfortunately we cannot identify language used on the page (probably there is a mix of languages, too little text or something else) and no language is claimed in <html> or <meta> tags either. Our system also found out that Programmingback.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

programmingback.com

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Programmingback. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: