2.6 sec in total
255 ms
2.2 sec
96 ms
Welcome to programmingforliving.com homepage info - get ready to check Programmingforliving best content for India right away, or after learning these important things about programmingforliving.com
This blog is about Java, J2EE, Weblogic, SOA etc technologies. This also contains common technical issues that I face at my work with their fixes.
Visit programmingforliving.comWe analyzed Programmingforliving.com page load time and found that the first response time was 255 ms and then it took 2.3 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 45% of websites can load faster.
programmingforliving.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value8.3 s
0/100
10%
Value12.2 s
0/100
25%
Value8.3 s
19/100
10%
Value570 ms
52/100
30%
Value0.016
100/100
15%
Value11.5 s
18/100
10%
255 ms
139 ms
45 ms
89 ms
66 ms
Our browser made a total of 46 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 4% of them (2 requests) were addressed to the original Programmingforliving.com, 41% (19 requests) were made to Agorbatchev.typepad.com and 13% (6 requests) were made to Google.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.5 sec) relates to the external source Google-analytics.com.
Page size can be reduced by 723.1 kB (63%)
1.1 MB
423.4 kB
In fact, the total size of Programmingforliving.com main page is 1.1 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 70% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 1.0 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 24.5 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 24.5 kB or 74% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 650.5 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 650.5 kB or 62% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 48.1 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Programmingforliving.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 48.1 kB or 76% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 37 (90%)
41
4
The browser has sent 41 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Programmingforliving. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 32 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 7 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
programmingforliving.com
255 ms
www.programmingforliving.com
139 ms
webfont.js
45 ms
3375562265-css_bundle_v2.css
89 ms
gsearch.css
66 ms
authorization.css
122 ms
shCore.css
201 ms
shThemeDefault.css
195 ms
jquery.js
39 ms
jquery-mousewheel.js
67 ms
common.js
82 ms
classic.js
83 ms
gadgets.js
71 ms
comments.js
84 ms
shCore.js
84 ms
shLegacy.js
82 ms
shBrushBash.js
83 ms
shBrushCss.js
78 ms
shBrushGroovy.js
83 ms
shBrushJScript.js
87 ms
shBrushXml.js
87 ms
shBrushJava.js
86 ms
shBrushPerl.js
88 ms
shBrushJavaFX.js
92 ms
shBrushPhp.js
91 ms
shBrushPlain.js
89 ms
shBrushPowerShell.js
92 ms
shBrushPython.js
97 ms
shBrushRuby.js
94 ms
shBrushScala.js
96 ms
shBrushSql.js
94 ms
shBrushCLI.js
86 ms
3731899860-widgets.js
86 ms
plusone.js
98 ms
jsapi
62 ms
css
54 ms
ga.js
1474 ms
cb=gapi.loaded_0
29 ms
22 ms
clear.gif
73 ms
OXYTDOzBcXU8MTNBvBHeSW8by34Z3mUMtM-o4y-SHCY.ttf
71 ms
Q-gJrFokeE7JydPpxASt25tc0eyfI4QDEsobEEpk_hA.ttf
71 ms
__utm.gif
32 ms
default+en.css
10 ms
default+en.I.js
16 ms
collect
68 ms
programmingforliving.com accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
<frame> or <iframe> elements do not have a title
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Links do not have a discernible name
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
programmingforliving.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
programmingforliving.com SEO score
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have descriptive text
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
EN
N/A
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Programmingforliving.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that Programmingforliving.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
programmingforliving.com
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Programmingforliving. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: