Tools & Wizards About Us
prohoverboard.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 84

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    88% of other websites

  • 96

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 88% of websites

  • 92

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    80% of websites

  • 100

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    94% of websites

prohoverboard.com

Best Hoverboard Reviews 2022 | Reviews & Buyer's Guide

Page Load Speed

3.9 sec in total

First Response

134 ms

Resources Loaded

1.4 sec

Page Rendered

2.4 sec

prohoverboard.com screenshot

About Website

Visit prohoverboard.com now to see the best up-to-date Pro Hoverboard content for Nepal and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about prohoverboard.com

Best Hoverboard Reviews 2022 – Reviews & Buyer's Guide. Find the best kids hoverboard, fastest hoverboards and Best Self-Balancing Hoverboard of 2022!

Visit prohoverboard.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Prohoverboard.com page load time and found that the first response time was 134 ms and then it took 3.7 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 65% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

prohoverboard.com performance score

84

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value2.9 s

53/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value3.4 s

67/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value2.9 s

95/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value140 ms

95/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.02

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value3.7 s

91/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

prohoverboard.com

134 ms

prohoverboard.com

353 ms

de30177656c717ff712b237bbe8a9fef.css

110 ms

css

51 ms

jquery.min.js

91 ms

Our browser made a total of 52 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 73% of them (38 requests) were addressed to the original Prohoverboard.com, 10% (5 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 8% (4 requests) were made to M.media-amazon.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (432 ms) relates to the external source Fonts.gstatic.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 131.2 kB (16%)

Content Size

828.3 kB

After Optimization

697.1 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Prohoverboard.com main page is 828.3 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 55% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 361.4 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-82%

Potential reduce by 128.7 kB

  • Original 157.7 kB
  • After minification 157.1 kB
  • After compression 29.0 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 128.7 kB or 82% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-1%

Potential reduce by 2.0 kB

  • Original 361.4 kB
  • After minification 359.4 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Pro Hoverboard images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 461 B

  • Original 183.1 kB
  • After minification 183.0 kB
  • After compression 182.6 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

CSS Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 0 B

  • Original 126.0 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 17 (40%)

Requests Now

43

After Optimization

26

  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 43 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Pro Hoverboard. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 18 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

prohoverboard.com

prohoverboard.com

134 ms

prohoverboard.com

prohoverboard.com

353 ms

de30177656c717ff712b237bbe8a9fef.css

de30177656c717ff712b237bbe8a9fef.css

110 ms

css

css

51 ms

jquery.min.js

jquery.min.js

91 ms

jquery-migrate.min.js

jquery-migrate.min.js

68 ms

entry-date.js

entry-date.js

89 ms

js

js

79 ms

adsbygoogle.js

adsbygoogle.js

408 ms

adsbygoogle.js

adsbygoogle.js

414 ms

index.js

index.js

64 ms

index.js

index.js

61 ms

hoverIntent.min.js

hoverIntent.min.js

65 ms

superfish.min.js

superfish.min.js

374 ms

superfish.args.min.js

superfish.args.min.js

375 ms

skip-links.min.js

skip-links.min.js

376 ms

responsive-menus.min.js

responsive-menus.min.js

376 ms

js.cookie.min.js

js.cookie.min.js

376 ms

underscore.min.js

underscore.min.js

378 ms

wp-util.min.js

wp-util.min.js

377 ms

main.js

main.js

378 ms

lazyload.min.js

lazyload.min.js

378 ms

cropped-hvrboard2.png

cropped-hvrboard2.png

154 ms

1Ptxg8zYS_SKggPN4iEgvnHyvveLxVvaorCIPrQ.ttf

1Ptxg8zYS_SKggPN4iEgvnHyvveLxVvaorCIPrQ.ttf

157 ms

1Ptxg8zYS_SKggPN4iEgvnHyvveLxVvoorCIPrQ.ttf

1Ptxg8zYS_SKggPN4iEgvnHyvveLxVvoorCIPrQ.ttf

287 ms

1Ptxg8zYS_SKggPN4iEgvnHyvveLxVtzpbCIPrQ.ttf

1Ptxg8zYS_SKggPN4iEgvnHyvveLxVtzpbCIPrQ.ttf

360 ms

KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmSU5fBBc9.ttf

KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmSU5fBBc9.ttf

431 ms

KFOmCnqEu92Fr1Mu4mxP.ttf

KFOmCnqEu92Fr1Mu4mxP.ttf

432 ms

forkawesome-webfont.woff

forkawesome-webfont.woff

286 ms

i2-pros-cons.woff

i2-pros-cons.woff

44 ms

youtube.png

youtube.png

121 ms

51S4wrrjHTL._SL500_.jpg

51S4wrrjHTL._SL500_.jpg

250 ms

hqdefault.jpg

hqdefault.jpg

398 ms

41rBPiSRBlL._SL500_.jpg

41rBPiSRBlL._SL500_.jpg

315 ms

31QLMOzRbLL._SL500_.jpg

31QLMOzRbLL._SL500_.jpg

315 ms

31ArhugeOJL._SL500_.jpg

31ArhugeOJL._SL500_.jpg

388 ms

fff-300x200.jpg

fff-300x200.jpg

240 ms

City-Cruiser-Hover-Board-min-300x150.jpg

City-Cruiser-Hover-Board-min-300x150.jpg

241 ms

Jolege-Self-Balancing-Hoverboard-min-300x150.jpg

Jolege-Self-Balancing-Hoverboard-min-300x150.jpg

239 ms

UNI-SUN-Hoverboard-min-300x150.jpg

UNI-SUN-Hoverboard-min-300x150.jpg

240 ms

Gyroor-Warrior-Hoverboard-min-300x150.jpg

Gyroor-Warrior-Hoverboard-min-300x150.jpg

239 ms

Swagtron-Hoverboard-Self-Balancing-Wheel-min-300x150.jpg

Swagtron-Hoverboard-Self-Balancing-Wheel-min-300x150.jpg

312 ms

Swagtron-Swagboard-Elite-Hoverboard-min-300x150.jpg

Swagtron-Swagboard-Elite-Hoverboard-min-300x150.jpg

311 ms

EPCTEK-Hoverboard-Self-Balancing-scooter-min-300x150.jpg

EPCTEK-Hoverboard-Self-Balancing-scooter-min-300x150.jpg

311 ms

LIEAGLE-Hoverboard-min-300x150.jpg

LIEAGLE-Hoverboard-min-300x150.jpg

309 ms

Go-Bowen-Two-Wheel-Self-Balancing-Scooter-min-300x150.jpg

Go-Bowen-Two-Wheel-Self-Balancing-Scooter-min-300x150.jpg

312 ms

Hover-heart-Two-Wheel-Self-Balancing-Electric-Scooter-300x150.jpg

Hover-heart-Two-Wheel-Self-Balancing-Electric-Scooter-300x150.jpg

307 ms

Halo-Rover-X-Hoverboard-300x150.jpg

Halo-Rover-X-Hoverboard-300x150.jpg

390 ms

Gotrax-Hoverfly-Eco-self-balancing-Hoverboard-scooter-min-300x150.jpg

Gotrax-Hoverfly-Eco-self-balancing-Hoverboard-scooter-min-300x150.jpg

386 ms

Swagtron-T-580-Hoverboard-min-300x150.jpg

Swagtron-T-580-Hoverboard-min-300x150.jpg

386 ms

Veeko-Self-balancing-Hoverboard-Budget-control-users-min-300x150.jpg

Veeko-Self-balancing-Hoverboard-Budget-control-users-min-300x150.jpg

389 ms

Hoverzon-S-Hover-Board-min-300x150.jpg

Hoverzon-S-Hover-Board-min-300x150.jpg

385 ms

Accessibility Review

prohoverboard.com accessibility score

96

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Best Practices

prohoverboard.com best practices score

92

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

SEO Factors

prohoverboard.com SEO score

100

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Prohoverboard.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Prohoverboard.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

prohoverboard.com

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Pro Hoverboard. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: