Tools & Wizards About Us
project-live.org screenshot

Report Summary

  • 0

    Performance

  • 68

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 33% of websites

  • 75

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    36% of websites

  • 64

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    24% of websites

project-live.org

极速赛车在线注册平台|168极速赛车现场开奖结果+官网历史记录查询|1分钟极速赛车官方精准计划|Project-live.org：Best Cars, Best Trucks, and Best SUVs | U.S. News & World Report

Page Load Speed

1.8 sec in total

First Response

380 ms

Resources Loaded

988 ms

Page Rendered

383 ms

project-live.org screenshot

About Website

Click here to check amazing Project Live content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about project-live.org

极速赛车在线注册平台【fen8811.com】Find out which cars are #1 in our rankings of best cars, read the latest car reviews, find the best deals and use our shopping tools to find your next car.

Visit project-live.org

Key Findings

We analyzed Project-live.org page load time and found that the first response time was 380 ms and then it took 1.4 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 25% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

project-live.org performance score

0

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value4.8 s

12/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value0

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value8.3 s

19/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value1,370 ms

16/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.212

59/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value11.5 s

18/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

project-live.org

380 ms

bg2.png

178 ms

topheader.png

90 ms

mainpagebackground.png

155 ms

LOGO.png

154 ms

Our browser made a total of 30 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 80% of them (24 requests) were addressed to the original Project-live.org, 13% (4 requests) were made to Pagead2.googlesyndication.com and 3% (1 request) were made to I698.photobucket.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (612 ms) relates to the external source I698.photobucket.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 156.9 kB (27%)

Content Size

573.9 kB

After Optimization

417.0 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript

In fact, the total size of Project-live.org main page is 573.9 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 25% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 536.2 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-76%

Potential reduce by 17.6 kB

  • Original 23.1 kB
  • After minification 22.2 kB
  • After compression 5.4 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 17.6 kB or 76% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-26%

Potential reduce by 139.2 kB

  • Original 536.2 kB
  • After minification 397.1 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Project Live needs image optimization as it can save up to 139.2 kB or 26% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.

JavaScript Optimization

-1%

Potential reduce by 125 B

  • Original 14.6 kB
  • After minification 14.5 kB
  • After compression 14.5 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 3 (10%)

Requests Now

29

After Optimization

26

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript

The browser has sent 29 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Project Live. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 4 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

project-live.org

project-live.org

380 ms

bg2.png

bg2.png

178 ms

topheader.png

topheader.png

90 ms

mainpagebackground.png

mainpagebackground.png

155 ms

LOGO.png

LOGO.png

154 ms

topmenubar.png

topmenubar.png

88 ms

double%20button.png

double%20button.png

89 ms

whatisPLbg.png

whatisPLbg.png

160 ms

whatispltop.png

whatispltop.png

154 ms

whatisplbottom.png

whatisplbottom.png

155 ms

main2c.jpg

main2c.jpg

612 ms

show_ads.js

show_ads.js

8 ms

quote3.png

quote3.png

132 ms

pushbutton.png

pushbutton.png

135 ms

spacerimage.png

spacerimage.png

149 ms

facebook_logo.jpg

facebook_logo.jpg

200 ms

imagesCABWSADF.jpg

imagesCABWSADF.jpg

170 ms

myspace_logo.jpg

myspace_logo.jpg

174 ms

autismtripbackground.png

autismtripbackground.png

172 ms

sideadbackground.png

sideadbackground.png

184 ms

angel.jpg

angel.jpg

190 ms

newad.jpg

newad.jpg

267 ms

spinzad.png

spinzad.png

207 ms

floundernad.png

floundernad.png

211 ms

randallpstudiosad.png

randallpstudiosad.png

218 ms

ca-pub-3307452796186557.js

ca-pub-3307452796186557.js

118 ms

zrt_lookup.html

zrt_lookup.html

41 ms

show_ads_impl.js

show_ads_impl.js

61 ms

footer.png

footer.png

214 ms

osd.js

osd.js

7 ms

Accessibility Review

project-live.org accessibility score

68

Accessibility Issues

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

<frame> or <iframe> elements do not have a title

Best practices

These items highlight common accessibility best practices.

Impact

Issue

High

[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.

Best Practices

project-live.org best practices score

75

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

SEO Factors

project-live.org SEO score

64

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    N/A

  • Encoding

    ISO-8859-1

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Project-live.org can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that Project-live.org main page’s claimed encoding is iso-8859-1. Changing it to UTF-8 can be a good choice, as this format is commonly used for encoding all over the web and thus their visitors won’t have any troubles with symbol transcription or reading.

Social Sharing Optimization

project-live.org

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Project Live. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: