Tools & Wizards About Us
projectclue.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 45

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    64% of other websites

  • 62

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 28% of websites

  • 58

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    19% of websites

  • 83

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    46% of websites

projectclue.com

Undergraduate Project Topics, Research Works and Materials

Page Load Speed

2.8 sec in total

First Response

606 ms

Resources Loaded

1.7 sec

Page Rendered

533 ms

projectclue.com screenshot

About Website

Welcome to projectclue.com homepage info - get ready to check Project Clue best content for Nigeria right away, or after learning these important things about projectclue.com

Largest Undergraduate Projects Repository, Research Works and Materials. Download Undergraduate Projects Topics and Materials Accounting, Economics, Education

Visit projectclue.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Projectclue.com page load time and found that the first response time was 606 ms and then it took 2.2 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 40% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

projectclue.com performance score

45

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value2.9 s

53/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value7.5 s

4/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value4.6 s

70/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value200 ms

90/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.723

6/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value9.0 s

34/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

projectclue.com

606 ms

bootstrap.css

44 ms

jasny-bootstrap.css

18 ms

css.css

17 ms

font-awesome.css

19 ms

Our browser made a total of 64 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 47% of them (30 requests) were addressed to the original Projectclue.com, 17% (11 requests) were made to Static.xx.fbcdn.net and 6% (4 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (606 ms) belongs to the original domain Projectclue.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 1.3 MB (56%)

Content Size

2.4 MB

After Optimization

1.1 MB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Projectclue.com main page is 2.4 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 80% of websites need less resources to load and that’s why Accessify’s recommendations for optimization and resource minification can be helpful for this project. Javascripts take 1.2 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-87%

Potential reduce by 116.9 kB

  • Original 133.8 kB
  • After minification 94.7 kB
  • After compression 16.8 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 39.1 kB, which is 29% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 116.9 kB or 87% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-11%

Potential reduce by 90.9 kB

  • Original 813.2 kB
  • After minification 722.3 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Project Clue needs image optimization as it can save up to 90.9 kB or 11% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.

JavaScript Optimization

-78%

Potential reduce by 904.6 kB

  • Original 1.2 MB
  • After minification 980.8 kB
  • After compression 262.5 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 904.6 kB or 78% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-82%

Potential reduce by 234.4 kB

  • Original 287.3 kB
  • After minification 265.2 kB
  • After compression 52.8 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Projectclue.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 234.4 kB or 82% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 30 (52%)

Requests Now

58

After Optimization

28

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 58 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Project Clue. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 19 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 13 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

projectclue.com

projectclue.com

606 ms

bootstrap.css

bootstrap.css

44 ms

jasny-bootstrap.css

jasny-bootstrap.css

18 ms

css.css

css.css

17 ms

font-awesome.css

font-awesome.css

19 ms

bootstrap-glyphicons.css

bootstrap-glyphicons.css

20 ms

bootstrap-select.css

bootstrap-select.css

20 ms

dataTables.css

dataTables.css

23 ms

styles.css

styles.css

129 ms

rebrand.css

rebrand.css

32 ms

general_custom.css

general_custom.css

27 ms

jquery.min.js

jquery.min.js

134 ms

jquery-ui.js

jquery-ui.js

135 ms

jquery-migrate-1.js

jquery-migrate-1.js

36 ms

bootstrap.js

bootstrap.js

126 ms

jasny-bootstrap.js

jasny-bootstrap.js

124 ms

sdk.js

sdk.js

73 ms

ProjectClue.1.gif

ProjectClue.1.gif

409 ms

default

default

405 ms

css

css

65 ms

logo_pproject-topics-materials-nigeria.png

logo_pproject-topics-materials-nigeria.png

43 ms

project-topics-materials-nigeria_banner-2.png

project-topics-materials-nigeria_banner-2.png

55 ms

writer.png

writer.png

55 ms

whatsapp-logo2.png

whatsapp-logo2.png

46 ms

1456695948_project-topics-materials-nigeria.jpg

1456695948_project-topics-materials-nigeria.jpg

43 ms

1456695250_project-topic-materials-nigeria.jpg

1456695250_project-topic-materials-nigeria.jpg

44 ms

1456694213_how-write-standard-abstract%20(1).jpg

1456694213_how-write-standard-abstract%20(1).jpg

46 ms

1456690794_project-topics-materials-nigeria2.jpg

1456690794_project-topics-materials-nigeria2.jpg

45 ms

1456689899_research-project-topics-materials-nigeria1.jpg

1456689899_research-project-topics-materials-nigeria1.jpg

53 ms

1456689727_project-topics-materials-nigeria31.jpg

1456689727_project-topics-materials-nigeria31.jpg

52 ms

340 ms

0sTQzbapM8j.js

0sTQzbapM8j.js

253 ms

0sTQzbapM8j.js

0sTQzbapM8j.js

334 ms

ODelI1aHBYDBqgeIAH2zlBM0YzuT7MdOe03otPbuUS0.woff

ODelI1aHBYDBqgeIAH2zlBM0YzuT7MdOe03otPbuUS0.woff

204 ms

toadOcfmlt9b38dHJxOBGJ6-ys_j0H4QL65VLqzI3wI.woff

toadOcfmlt9b38dHJxOBGJ6-ys_j0H4QL65VLqzI3wI.woff

254 ms

toadOcfmlt9b38dHJxOBGFkQc6VGVFSmCnC_l7QZG60.woff

toadOcfmlt9b38dHJxOBGFkQc6VGVFSmCnC_l7QZG60.woff

280 ms

montserrat-regular.svg

montserrat-regular.svg

254 ms

montserrat-regular.woff

montserrat-regular.woff

254 ms

fontawesome-webfont.woff

fontawesome-webfont.woff

163 ms

M2Jd71oPJhLKp0zdtTvoMzNrcjQuD0pTu1za2FULaMs.woff

M2Jd71oPJhLKp0zdtTvoMzNrcjQuD0pTu1za2FULaMs.woff

280 ms

analytics.js

analytics.js

270 ms

page.php

page.php

142 ms

icons.png

icons.png

214 ms

emojione.min.css

emojione.min.css

207 ms

emojione.min.js

emojione.min.js

231 ms

1504691888490

1504691888490

370 ms

ajax-loader.gif

ajax-loader.gif

266 ms

NGU_mTNA751.css

NGU_mTNA751.css

184 ms

BWRIL9-XbYW.js

BWRIL9-XbYW.js

236 ms

JrFVMrRpAYB.js

JrFVMrRpAYB.js

260 ms

iFBP3Ltwel2.js

iFBP3Ltwel2.js

267 ms

2e4nmgzajeT.js

2e4nmgzajeT.js

266 ms

xHQWNuU6NG7.js

xHQWNuU6NG7.js

265 ms

I0twv5cR4Lp.js

I0twv5cR4Lp.js

266 ms

S9jMCKT8oc5.js

S9jMCKT8oc5.js

266 ms

T-D_V7C7Ph6.js

T-D_V7C7Ph6.js

266 ms

montserrat-regular.ttf

montserrat-regular.ttf

76 ms

collect

collect

63 ms

13267823_287040778298315_2013936133331692537_n.jpg

13267823_287040778298315_2013936133331692537_n.jpg

175 ms

13174035_282268938775499_2347055351159919282_n.png

13174035_282268938775499_2347055351159919282_n.png

177 ms

wMkwmq5_RAN.png

wMkwmq5_RAN.png

66 ms

31 ms

WgFKRx0VFOG.png

WgFKRx0VFOG.png

19 ms

ajax-loader-3.gif

ajax-loader-3.gif

21 ms

Accessibility Review

projectclue.com accessibility score

62

Accessibility Issues

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Buttons do not have an accessible name

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Tables and lists

These are opportunities to improve the experience of reading tabular or list data using assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

List items (<li>) are not contained within <ul> or <ol> parent elements.

Best Practices

projectclue.com best practices score

58

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Displays images with incorrect aspect ratio

High

Serves images with low resolution

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

SEO Factors

projectclue.com SEO score

83

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

robots.txt is not valid

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    N/A

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Projectclue.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that Projectclue.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

projectclue.com

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Project Clue. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: