Tools & Wizards About Us
projectfacts.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 57

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    73% of other websites

  • 86

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 61% of websites

  • 83

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    55% of websites

  • 92

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    74% of websites

projectfacts.com

projectfacts - The software for your business processes

Page Load Speed

3.8 sec in total

First Response

278 ms

Resources Loaded

2.9 sec

Page Rendered

587 ms

projectfacts.com screenshot

About Website

Visit projectfacts.com now to see the best up-to-date Projectfacts content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about projectfacts.com

projectfacts is the ERP software for your company. ✓ Project management ✓ CRM ✓ Invoicing ✓ Time recording ✓ Tickets

Visit projectfacts.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Projectfacts.com page load time and found that the first response time was 278 ms and then it took 3.5 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 60% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

projectfacts.com performance score

57

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value3.4 s

36/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value6.2 s

11/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value4.5 s

71/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value320 ms

77/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.041

99/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value6.3 s

61/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

projectfacts.com

278 ms

projectfacts.com

417 ms

www.projectfacts.com

441 ms

gtm.js

62 ms

stylesheet.css

107 ms

Our browser made a total of 53 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 79% of them (42 requests) were addressed to the original Projectfacts.com, 8% (4 requests) were made to Use.fontawesome.com and 6% (3 requests) were made to Google-analytics.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (804 ms) belongs to the original domain Projectfacts.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 54.6 kB (7%)

Content Size

810.1 kB

After Optimization

755.5 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Projectfacts.com main page is 810.1 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 35% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 690.8 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-76%

Potential reduce by 28.0 kB

  • Original 36.8 kB
  • After minification 31.8 kB
  • After compression 8.8 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 5.0 kB, which is 14% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 28.0 kB or 76% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-3%

Potential reduce by 21.7 kB

  • Original 690.8 kB
  • After minification 669.0 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Projectfacts images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 253 B

  • Original 56.1 kB
  • After minification 56.1 kB
  • After compression 55.9 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

CSS Optimization

-17%

Potential reduce by 4.6 kB

  • Original 26.4 kB
  • After minification 26.4 kB
  • After compression 21.8 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Projectfacts.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 4.6 kB or 17% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 15 (31%)

Requests Now

49

After Optimization

34

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 49 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Projectfacts. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 7 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 10 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

projectfacts.com

projectfacts.com

278 ms

projectfacts.com

projectfacts.com

417 ms

www.projectfacts.com

www.projectfacts.com

441 ms

gtm.js

gtm.js

62 ms

stylesheet.css

stylesheet.css

107 ms

stylesheet-index.css

stylesheet-index.css

208 ms

278d2a04d6.js

278d2a04d6.js

211 ms

jquery-3.4.1.min.js

jquery-3.4.1.min.js

425 ms

script.js

script.js

302 ms

cookieConsent.js

cookieConsent.js

306 ms

js

js

47 ms

analytics.js

analytics.js

18 ms

collect

collect

40 ms

collect

collect

39 ms

collect

collect

27 ms

ga-audiences

ga-audiences

27 ms

278d2a04d6.css

278d2a04d6.css

103 ms

font-awesome-css.min.css

font-awesome-css.min.css

43 ms

projectfacts_Logo_2022_weiss.svg

projectfacts_Logo_2022_weiss.svg

103 ms

projectfacts_Logo_2022.svg

projectfacts_Logo_2022.svg

102 ms

projectfacts-Darmstadt.jpg

projectfacts-Darmstadt.jpg

202 ms

Screenshot-Boards.png

Screenshot-Boards.png

344 ms

SHiG-Logo-klein_small.png

SHiG-Logo-klein_small.png

114 ms

SMiG_RGB_150dpi.png

SMiG_RGB_150dpi.png

503 ms

T100_18_Member_small-1.png

T100_18_Member_small-1.png

203 ms

ICON_SmartBusiness_small.png

ICON_SmartBusiness_small.png

210 ms

best-of-erp-2018_small.png

best-of-erp-2018_small.png

302 ms

DSGVO_weiss.png

DSGVO_weiss.png

303 ms

free-trial-account.jpg

free-trial-account.jpg

417 ms

EN_Grafik_Startseite.svg

EN_Grafik_Startseite.svg

403 ms

anmatho.png

anmatho.png

416 ms

informatec.jpeg

informatec.jpeg

503 ms

Pitzek.png

Pitzek.png

445 ms

Hoerl.png

Hoerl.png

500 ms

logo.jpg

logo.jpg

504 ms

Woodmark.jpeg

Woodmark.jpeg

505 ms

7-it-logo.jpeg

7-it-logo.jpeg

546 ms

constag-logo.jpeg

constag-logo.jpeg

597 ms

maas.jpeg

maas.jpeg

602 ms

modulacht.jpeg

modulacht.jpeg

604 ms

fundus_logo.jpeg

fundus_logo.jpeg

605 ms

explido-iprospect-logo.jpeg

explido-iprospect-logo.jpeg

605 ms

Slenderiser-Logo-quer-klein_transparent.jpeg

Slenderiser-Logo-quer-klein_transparent.jpeg

647 ms

transfer-1.jpg

transfer-1.jpg

694 ms

Innoface.jpeg

Innoface.jpeg

703 ms

wahler.jpeg

wahler.jpeg

804 ms

fontawesome-webfont.woff

fontawesome-webfont.woff

89 ms

stylesheet-1330px.css

stylesheet-1330px.css

103 ms

stylesheet-1240px.css

stylesheet-1240px.css

102 ms

stylesheet-768px.css

stylesheet-768px.css

106 ms

stylesheet-1330px-index.css

stylesheet-1330px-index.css

103 ms

stylesheet-1240px-index.css

stylesheet-1240px-index.css

103 ms

stylesheet-768px-index.css

stylesheet-768px-index.css

102 ms

Accessibility Review

projectfacts.com accessibility score

86

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Form elements do not have associated labels

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Tables and lists

These are opportunities to improve the experience of reading tabular or list data using assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Lists do not contain only <li> elements and script supporting elements (<script> and <template>).

Best Practices

projectfacts.com best practices score

83

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

SEO Factors

projectfacts.com SEO score

92

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Projectfacts.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Projectfacts.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

projectfacts.com

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Projectfacts. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: