Report Summary

  • 0

    Performance

  • 33

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 18% of websites

  • 75

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    35% of websites

  • 64

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    24% of websites

projectif.net

Touriseo

Page Load Speed

3 sec in total

First Response

287 ms

Resources Loaded

2.4 sec

Page Rendered

290 ms

projectif.net screenshot

About Website

Click here to check amazing Projectif content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about projectif.net

Visit projectif.net

Key Findings

We analyzed Projectif.net page load time and found that the first response time was 287 ms and then it took 2.7 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 50% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

projectif.net performance score

0

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value0

0/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value0

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value0

0/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value0

0/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.524

15/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value0

0/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

projectif.net

287 ms

PROJECTIF_WEB

101 ms

113 ms

FR

92 ms

337 ms

Our browser made a total of 89 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 81% of them (72 requests) were addressed to the original Projectif.net, 3% (3 requests) were made to Cdn.shareaholic.com and 3% (3 requests) were made to Google-analytics.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1 sec) belongs to the original domain Projectif.net.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 236.1 kB (8%)

Content Size

2.8 MB

After Optimization

2.6 MB

In fact, the total size of Projectif.net main page is 2.8 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 65% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 2.3 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-28%

Potential reduce by 88 B

  • Original 318 B
  • After minification 316 B
  • After compression 230 B

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 88 B or 28% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-5%

Potential reduce by 123.1 kB

  • Original 2.3 MB
  • After minification 2.2 MB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Projectif images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-18%

Potential reduce by 83.4 kB

  • Original 475.6 kB
  • After minification 475.6 kB
  • After compression 392.2 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 83.4 kB or 18% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-82%

Potential reduce by 29.5 kB

  • Original 36.0 kB
  • After minification 10.3 kB
  • After compression 6.5 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Projectif.net needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 29.5 kB or 82% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 32 (42%)

Requests Now

76

After Optimization

44

The browser has sent 76 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Projectif. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 25 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 9 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Accessibility Review

projectif.net accessibility score

33

Accessibility Issues

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

<frame> or <iframe> elements do not have a title

Internationalization and localization

These are opportunities to improve the interpretation of your content by users in different locales.

Impact

Issue

High

<html> element does not have a [lang] attribute

Best Practices

projectif.net best practices score

75

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

SEO Factors

projectif.net SEO score

64

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    N/A

  • Language Claimed

    N/A

  • Encoding

    ISO-8859-1

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Projectif.net can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Unfortunately we cannot identify language used on the page (probably there is a mix of languages, too little text or something else) and no language is claimed in <html> or <meta> tags either. Our system also found out that Projectif.net main page’s claimed encoding is iso-8859-1. Changing it to UTF-8 can be a good choice, as this format is commonly used for encoding all over the web and thus their visitors won’t have any troubles with symbol transcription or reading.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Projectif. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: