3 sec in total
287 ms
2.4 sec
290 ms
Click here to check amazing Projectif content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about projectif.net
Visit projectif.netWe analyzed Projectif.net page load time and found that the first response time was 287 ms and then it took 2.7 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 50% of websites can load faster.
projectif.net performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value0
0/100
10%
Value0
0/100
25%
Value0
0/100
10%
Value0
0/100
30%
Value0.524
15/100
15%
Value0
0/100
10%
287 ms
101 ms
113 ms
92 ms
337 ms
Our browser made a total of 89 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 81% of them (72 requests) were addressed to the original Projectif.net, 3% (3 requests) were made to Cdn.shareaholic.com and 3% (3 requests) were made to Google-analytics.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1 sec) belongs to the original domain Projectif.net.
Page size can be reduced by 236.1 kB (8%)
2.8 MB
2.6 MB
In fact, the total size of Projectif.net main page is 2.8 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 65% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 2.3 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 88 B
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 88 B or 28% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 123.1 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Projectif images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 83.4 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 83.4 kB or 18% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 29.5 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Projectif.net needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 29.5 kB or 82% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 32 (42%)
76
44
The browser has sent 76 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Projectif. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 25 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 9 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
projectif.net
287 ms
PROJECTIF_WEB
101 ms
113 ms
FR
92 ms
337 ms
jflow.style.css
181 ms
LienBlanc.css
179 ms
jquery.min.js
10 ms
jflow.plus.min.js
192 ms
jquery.easing.1.3.min.js
193 ms
jquery.sliderkit.1.9.2.pack.js
193 ms
sliderkit-core.css
266 ms
sliderkit-demos.css
266 ms
standard.css
274 ms
static.css
461 ms
Projectif.css
278 ms
palette-Projectif.css
279 ms
palette-Default.css
352 ms
WWConstante5.js
252 ms
WDUtil.js
270 ms
StdAction.js
181 ms
WDChamp.js
182 ms
WDXML.js
252 ms
WDDrag.js
309 ms
WDAJAX.js
374 ms
WDTableZRCommun.js
430 ms
WDAnim.js
430 ms
jquery-ui.js
462 ms
jquery-effet.js
556 ms
jquery-ancrage-sup-epingle.js
457 ms
logo_header.jpg
387 ms
cgmp-france_accueil.png
867 ms
ec-eau-technic_accueil.png
874 ms
decoration_animaux_accueil.png
649 ms
123soutien_accueil.png
844 ms
cuveesandco_accueil.png
662 ms
touriseo_accueil2.png
1019 ms
actu.png
741 ms
actu3.png
754 ms
logo_footer.png
832 ms
arobase_footer.png
848 ms
print_footer.png
924 ms
iphone_footer.png
935 ms
appli_footer.png
939 ms
fond_bandeau_haut.jpg
751 ms
btn_4a62e0615d88f392684d4038cd2287f5aa7906ee.png
757 ms
btn_f9ec003e80c2f5148cfafa2d573fe89f16de9f.png
811 ms
btn_682dc885d8fb3cccb5ac013471d1f1e776bb64bb.png
823 ms
btn_ccda2e57da42612973ee2ac6452d8448c344b981.png
828 ms
btn_f024f7d7f090d4c3d3e052b0dae959edb29e2b5.png
838 ms
btn_687cb5d0cb364961b1043a2a776182b038ece8d4.png
842 ms
btn_b0935563baab06a68676f71af60c37f0ee958048.png
902 ms
btn_df858ee37f8e6f0beded2046e5aa7831e82e6749.png
906 ms
tranche_accueil.jpg
914 ms
bullet.png
919 ms
arrows.png
924 ms
fond_bandeau_milieu.jpg
929 ms
mandataire.jpg
993 ms
jquery.shareaholic-publishers-sb.min.js
21 ms
btn_762f583f3a59e4dbed9814a56d6d41b73a92ea56.png
978 ms
ga.js
19 ms
referencement.jpg
966 ms
jquery.min.js
15 ms
__utm.gif
12 ms
shareaholic-analytics.js
9 ms
shareaholic_analytics.js
17 ms
btn_2237704fa8a4924765222fafcda12cb04b8a1305.png
923 ms
wp-loader.js
4 ms
ga.js
20 ms
header-notifications.js
22 ms
btn_a79380451c6f0fab2b639ed2d93300fe55f8017.png
872 ms
logiciel.jpg
868 ms
smartphone.jpg
916 ms
btn_b218f66ee6ae8c46b9746ae947aeda4e612d6529.png
909 ms
print.jpg
915 ms
sprite.css
286 ms
restserver.php
34 ms
count.json
7 ms
data
5 ms
analytics_frame.html
41 ms
btn_f1e11ebbc1316231246d2cce993cbedcb67370dd.png
795 ms
wp-loader.js
2 ms
share
80 ms
web.jpg
658 ms
btn_8afb9d0dc5eb49d9eda08ba3d5d80e44e74534b1.png
650 ms
btn_7607d3e1ac7fb44b7161e080154a7fd697266f34.png
642 ms
btn_240ea8a312524c3f119e28275de56d5fd2f3f71a.png
632 ms
sprite.png
92 ms
mixer.gif
20 ms
projectif.net accessibility score
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
<frame> or <iframe> elements do not have a title
Internationalization and localization
These are opportunities to improve the interpretation of your content by users in different locales.
Impact
Issue
<html> element does not have a [lang] attribute
projectif.net best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Browser errors were logged to the console
projectif.net SEO score
N/A
N/A
ISO-8859-1
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Projectif.net can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Unfortunately we cannot identify language used on the page (probably there is a mix of languages, too little text or something else) and no language is claimed in <html> or <meta> tags either. Our system also found out that Projectif.net main page’s claimed encoding is iso-8859-1. Changing it to UTF-8 can be a good choice, as this format is commonly used for encoding all over the web and thus their visitors won’t have any troubles with symbol transcription or reading.
projectif.net
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Projectif. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: