1.8 sec in total
143 ms
1.2 sec
444 ms
Visit projectric.com now to see the best up-to-date Projectric content for India and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about projectric.com
Projectric Nimble, project portfolio management software to simplify, measure, and achieve data-driven decisions for better project access and prioritization.
Visit projectric.comWe analyzed Projectric.com page load time and found that the first response time was 143 ms and then it took 1.6 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 35% of websites can load faster.
projectric.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value3.4 s
36/100
10%
Value3.9 s
53/100
25%
Value8.1 s
20/100
10%
Value1,310 ms
18/100
30%
Value0
100/100
15%
Value23.3 s
1/100
10%
143 ms
235 ms
61 ms
30 ms
36 ms
Our browser made a total of 97 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 87% of them (84 requests) were addressed to the original Projectric.com, 8% (8 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 2% (2 requests) were made to Googletagmanager.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (463 ms) belongs to the original domain Projectric.com.
Page size can be reduced by 8.0 kB (3%)
301.8 kB
293.8 kB
In fact, the total size of Projectric.com main page is 301.8 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. Only a small number of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 150.1 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by -8 B
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This web page is already compressed.
Potential reduce by 72 B
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Projectric images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 7.5 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.
Potential reduce by 381 B
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Projectric.com has all CSS files already compressed.
Number of requests can be reduced by 72 (86%)
84
12
The browser has sent 84 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Projectric. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 41 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 33 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
projectric.com
143 ms
projectric.com
235 ms
js
61 ms
main.min.css
30 ms
astra-local-fonts.css
36 ms
animategl.css
36 ms
styles.css
36 ms
contact-form-7-main.min.css
47 ms
tlpportfolio.css
51 ms
elementor-icons.min.css
50 ms
frontend.min.css
46 ms
swiper.min.css
52 ms
e-swiper.min.css
50 ms
jet-sticky-frontend.css
56 ms
all.min.css
66 ms
v4-shims.min.css
64 ms
she-header-style.css
57 ms
widget-image.min.css
61 ms
widget-heading.min.css
60 ms
widget-text-editor.min.css
69 ms
shapes.min.css
70 ms
fadeInRight.min.css
73 ms
fadeInUp.min.css
75 ms
styles.css
80 ms
ekiticons.css
104 ms
widget-styles.css
87 ms
responsive.css
81 ms
button-animations.min.css
109 ms
text-animations.min.css
111 ms
frontend.min.css
118 ms
css
63 ms
fontawesome.min.css
112 ms
solid.min.css
112 ms
jquery.min.js
116 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
116 ms
el.js
116 ms
frontend-gtag.min.js
116 ms
animategl.min.js
153 ms
embed.js
152 ms
v4-shims.min.js
152 ms
api.js
67 ms
vcd15cbe7772f49c399c6a5babf22c1241717689176015
107 ms
wpdevart_lightbox_front.css
153 ms
effects_lightbox.css
127 ms
widget-icon-list.min.css
127 ms
she-header.js
129 ms
email-decode.min.js
114 ms
frontend.min.js
115 ms
hooks.min.js
111 ms
i18n.min.js
166 ms
index.js
168 ms
index.js
250 ms
script.js
162 ms
dom-ready.min.js
242 ms
main.js
239 ms
particles.js
239 ms
jarallax.min.js
237 ms
parallax.min.js
231 ms
frontend-script.js
233 ms
widget-scripts.js
236 ms
wp-polyfill.min.js
230 ms
index.js
228 ms
wpdevart_lightbox_front.js
223 ms
ResizeSensor.min.js
222 ms
sticky-sidebar.min.js
200 ms
jquery.jsticky.js
197 ms
webpack.runtime.min.js
194 ms
frontend-modules.min.js
194 ms
core.min.js
190 ms
frontend.min.js
191 ms
jet-sticky-frontend.js
192 ms
animate-circle.min.js
190 ms
elementor.js
189 ms
frontend.min.js
160 ms
modal-popups.min.js
158 ms
gtm.js
141 ms
logoblue.png
96 ms
logowhite.png
97 ms
mainbnnerhome.jpg
98 ms
d555a282-c0e0-4df1-92c6-b6537176fe80.jpg
96 ms
Project-Management_Dept-Image.png
99 ms
Operations_Dept-Image-300x173.png
238 ms
Finance_Dept-Image.png
390 ms
Projectric-On-Demand-Demo-Pod-Image-1024x1024.png
99 ms
Projectric-Resources-Pod-Image-1024x1024.png
101 ms
Industry-Trends-Pod-Image-1024x1024.png
102 ms
XRXI3I6Li01BKofiOc5wtlZ2di8HDLshdTQ3iQ.woff
48 ms
XRXI3I6Li01BKofiOc5wtlZ2di8HDIkhdTQ3iQ.woff
48 ms
XRXI3I6Li01BKofiOc5wtlZ2di8HDOUhdTQ3iQ.woff
99 ms
XRXI3I6Li01BKofiOc5wtlZ2di8HDDshdTQ3iQ.woff
108 ms
XRXI3I6Li01BKofiOc5wtlZ2di8HDGUmdTQ3iQ.woff
110 ms
XRXI3I6Li01BKofiOc5wtlZ2di8HDFwmdTQ3iQ.woff
109 ms
XRXI3I6Li01BKofiOc5wtlZ2di8HDDsmdTQ3iQ.woff
109 ms
XRXI3I6Li01BKofiOc5wtlZ2di8HDBImdTQ3iQ.woff
109 ms
elementskit.woff
463 ms
fa-solid-900.woff
323 ms
fa-regular-400.woff
260 ms
projectric.com accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have a discernible name
projectric.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Browser errors were logged to the console
Page has valid source maps
projectric.com SEO score
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have descriptive text
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
EN
N/A
N/A
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Projectric.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that Projectric.com main page’s claimed encoding is . Changing it to UTF-8 can be a good choice, as this format is commonly used for encoding all over the web and thus their visitors won’t have any troubles with symbol transcription or reading.
projectric.com
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Projectric. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: