934 ms in total
117 ms
496 ms
321 ms
Visit projectrisk.com now to see the best up-to-date Project Risk content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about projectrisk.com
Consulting in schedule risk analysis, integrated cost-schedule risk analysis, schedule assessment, risk identification, and risk register development.
Visit projectrisk.comWe analyzed Projectrisk.com page load time and found that the first response time was 117 ms and then it took 817 ms to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 15% of websites can load faster.
projectrisk.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value1.1 s
99/100
10%
Value1.5 s
100/100
25%
Value1.2 s
100/100
10%
Value10 ms
100/100
30%
Value0.85
4/100
15%
Value1.4 s
100/100
10%
117 ms
57 ms
218 ms
6 ms
107 ms
Our browser made a total of 23 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 78% of them (18 requests) were addressed to the original Projectrisk.com, 9% (2 requests) were made to Sealserver.trustwave.com and 9% (2 requests) were made to Google-analytics.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (260 ms) belongs to the original domain Projectrisk.com.
Page size can be reduced by 27.7 kB (10%)
289.1 kB
261.4 kB
In fact, the total size of Projectrisk.com main page is 289.1 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 25% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 244.1 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 11.4 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 2.9 kB, which is 18% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 11.4 kB or 71% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 12.1 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Project Risk images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 200 B
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.
Potential reduce by 4.0 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Projectrisk.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 4.0 kB or 37% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 3 (14%)
22
19
The browser has sent 22 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Project Risk. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 4 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.
projectrisk.com
117 ms
base.css
57 ms
seal.js
218 ms
jquery-1.7.2.min.js
6 ms
script.js
107 ms
normalize.css
57 ms
ga.js
8 ms
globe_med.jpg
63 ms
navblk.png
64 ms
logo_hulett_lg.gif
117 ms
dth-risk-analysis-course-doha200.jpg
116 ms
aace-dunfield.jpg
158 ms
aace-fellow480.jpg
157 ms
book_practical.jpg
157 ms
book_integrated.jpg
168 ms
rio_conference1.jpg
260 ms
project-management-presentation-qatar.jpg
160 ms
bogota-project-management-mtg.jpg
212 ms
social2.png
213 ms
Hulett_logo_border_sm.jpg
211 ms
__utm.gif
11 ms
seal_image.php
3 ms
downArrow.png
99 ms
projectrisk.com accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Tables and lists
These are opportunities to improve the experience of reading tabular or list data using assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Lists do not contain only <li> elements and script supporting elements (<script> and <template>).
projectrisk.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Displays images with incorrect aspect ratio
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
projectrisk.com SEO score
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Projectrisk.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Projectrisk.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
projectrisk.com
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Project Risk. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: