Report Summary

  • 61

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    76% of other websites

  • 98

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 94% of websites

  • 92

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    80% of websites

  • 100

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    94% of websites

projectterrapin.org

Projectterrapin.org

Page Load Speed

2.2 sec in total

First Response

90 ms

Resources Loaded

2 sec

Page Rendered

79 ms

projectterrapin.org screenshot

About Website

Welcome to projectterrapin.org homepage info - get ready to check Projectterrapin best content right away, or after learning these important things about projectterrapin.org

Project Terrapin complete website with links

Visit projectterrapin.org

Key Findings

We analyzed Projectterrapin.org page load time and found that the first response time was 90 ms and then it took 2.1 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 40% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

projectterrapin.org performance score

61

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value2.7 s

62/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value4.6 s

35/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value2.7 s

97/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value430 ms

65/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.085

93/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value10.1 s

26/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

www.projectterrapin.org

90 ms

minified.js

29 ms

focus-within-polyfill.js

62 ms

polyfill.min.js

803 ms

thunderbolt-commons.dae61f88.bundle.min.js

44 ms

Our browser made a total of 46 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 2% of them (1 request) were addressed to the original Projectterrapin.org, 33% (15 requests) were made to Static.wixstatic.com and 30% (14 requests) were made to Static.parastorage.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (959 ms) relates to the external source Static.wixstatic.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 641.0 kB (51%)

Content Size

1.3 MB

After Optimization

609.4 kB

In fact, the total size of Projectterrapin.org main page is 1.3 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 25% of websites need less resources to load. HTML takes 580.1 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-78%

Potential reduce by 452.5 kB

  • Original 580.1 kB
  • After minification 578.5 kB
  • After compression 127.6 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 452.5 kB or 78% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-39%

Potential reduce by 140.3 kB

  • Original 363.4 kB
  • After minification 223.0 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Projectterrapin needs image optimization as it can save up to 140.3 kB or 39% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.

JavaScript Optimization

-16%

Potential reduce by 48.1 kB

  • Original 306.9 kB
  • After minification 306.9 kB
  • After compression 258.7 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 48.1 kB or 16% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 11 (34%)

Requests Now

32

After Optimization

21

The browser has sent 32 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Projectterrapin. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 12 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.

Accessibility Review

projectterrapin.org accessibility score

98

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Best Practices

projectterrapin.org best practices score

92

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Page has valid source maps

SEO Factors

projectterrapin.org SEO score

100

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Projectterrapin.org can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Projectterrapin.org main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Projectterrapin. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: