Tools & Wizards About Us
projectworldimpact.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 15

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    27% of other websites

  • 78

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 45% of websites

  • 83

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    55% of websites

  • 92

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    74% of websites

projectworldimpact.com

Find Nonprofits | Get Involved In Charity | Project World Impact

Page Load Speed

1.8 sec in total

First Response

15 ms

Resources Loaded

1.6 sec

Page Rendered

164 ms

projectworldimpact.com screenshot

About Website

Click here to check amazing Project World Impact content for United States. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about projectworldimpact.com

Discover thousands of nonprofits and find out how you can be a part of the solution in addressing the world's most fundamental needs in a practical way.

Visit projectworldimpact.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Projectworldimpact.com page load time and found that the first response time was 15 ms and then it took 1.8 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 35% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

projectworldimpact.com performance score

15

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value10.3 s

0/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value25.2 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value15.7 s

0/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value4,250 ms

1/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value26.8 s

0/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

projectworldimpact.com

15 ms

projectworldimpact.com

538 ms

gtm.js

152 ms

fbevents.js

98 ms

app.js

96 ms

Our browser made a total of 81 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 52% of them (42 requests) were addressed to the original Projectworldimpact.com, 19% (15 requests) were made to Use.typekit.net and 4% (3 requests) were made to Cdnjs.cloudflare.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (577 ms) relates to the external source Lg3.media.net.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 549.9 kB (40%)

Content Size

1.4 MB

After Optimization

831.7 kB

  • HTML
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Projectworldimpact.com main page is 1.4 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 75% of websites need less resources to load and that’s why Accessify’s recommendations for optimization and resource minification can be helpful for this project. Javascripts take 794.9 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-85%

Potential reduce by 395.4 kB

  • Original 463.6 kB
  • After minification 340.8 kB
  • After compression 68.2 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 122.8 kB, which is 26% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 395.4 kB or 85% of the original size.

JavaScript Optimization

-19%

Potential reduce by 152.2 kB

  • Original 794.9 kB
  • After minification 741.6 kB
  • After compression 642.6 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 152.2 kB or 19% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-2%

Potential reduce by 2.3 kB

  • Original 123.1 kB
  • After minification 123.1 kB
  • After compression 120.8 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Projectworldimpact.com has all CSS files already compressed.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 55 (89%)

Requests Now

62

After Optimization

7

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 62 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Project World Impact. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 37 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 20 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

projectworldimpact.com

projectworldimpact.com

15 ms

projectworldimpact.com

projectworldimpact.com

538 ms

gtm.js

gtm.js

152 ms

fbevents.js

fbevents.js

98 ms

app.js

app.js

96 ms

pwi-confirm-button.js

pwi-confirm-button.js

89 ms

functions.js

functions.js

90 ms

parsley.min.js

parsley.min.js

89 ms

parsley.css

parsley.css

88 ms

bootstrap-fonts-icons.css

bootstrap-fonts-icons.css

88 ms

app.css

app.css

146 ms

index.css

index.css

124 ms

pwi-font.css

pwi-font.css

95 ms

colorbox.css

colorbox.css

94 ms

chm4zdk.css

chm4zdk.css

270 ms

5016f8ce12.js

5016f8ce12.js

170 ms

datepicker.css

datepicker.css

124 ms

select2.min.css

select2.min.css

126 ms

default.css

default.css

125 ms

default.date.css

default.date.css

125 ms

default.time.css

default.time.css

125 ms

sweetalert.js

sweetalert.js

126 ms

sweetalert.css

sweetalert.css

127 ms

dragula.js

dragula.js

136 ms

dragula.css

dragula.css

127 ms

conveneGeneric.js

conveneGeneric.js

126 ms

jquery.scrollTo.js

jquery.scrollTo.js

144 ms

api.js

api.js

136 ms

link-initialize.js

link-initialize.js

141 ms

141 ms

trix.css

trix.css

274 ms

trix.js

trix.js

281 ms

dmedianet.js

dmedianet.js

266 ms

select2.js

select2.js

140 ms

bootstrap-datepicker.js

bootstrap-datepicker.js

125 ms

legacy.js

legacy.js

134 ms

picker.js

picker.js

134 ms

picker.date.js

picker.date.js

258 ms

picker.time.js

picker.time.js

258 ms

flatpickr.min.css

flatpickr.min.css

120 ms

flatpickr

flatpickr

121 ms

jquery.jscroll.min.js

jquery.jscroll.min.js

286 ms

client

client

263 ms

webui-popover.css

webui-popover.css

255 ms

webui-popover.js

webui-popover.js

163 ms

pwi-modal.js

pwi-modal.js

163 ms

cause-modal.js

cause-modal.js

163 ms

country-modal.js

country-modal.js

258 ms

user.js

user.js

259 ms

homepage.css

homepage.css

254 ms

homepage.js

homepage.js

252 ms

all.js

all.js

28 ms

54 ms

css

css

60 ms

p.css

p.css

26 ms

481 ms

analytics.js

analytics.js

128 ms

recaptcha__en.js

recaptcha__en.js

258 ms

flping.php

flping.php

577 ms

sdk.js

sdk.js

41 ms

widgets.js

widgets.js

124 ms

collect

collect

60 ms

sdk.js

sdk.js

57 ms

d

d

204 ms

d

d

431 ms

d

d

430 ms

d

d

428 ms

d

d

430 ms

d

d

453 ms

d

d

452 ms

pwi-font.woff

pwi-font.woff

224 ms

AvenirNext-Bold_gdi.woff

AvenirNext-Bold_gdi.woff

275 ms

AvenirNext-DemiBold_gdi.woff

AvenirNext-DemiBold_gdi.woff

274 ms

d

d

233 ms

d

d

232 ms

d

d

235 ms

d

d

232 ms

d

d

233 ms

d

d

233 ms

d

d

234 ms

widget_iframe.2f70fb173b9000da126c79afe2098f02.html

widget_iframe.2f70fb173b9000da126c79afe2098f02.html

202 ms

Accessibility Review

projectworldimpact.com accessibility score

78

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

ARIA

These are opportunities to improve the usage of ARIA in your application which may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

ARIA IDs are not unique

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Best Practices

projectworldimpact.com best practices score

83

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Page has valid source maps

SEO Factors

projectworldimpact.com SEO score

92

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Page is blocked from indexing

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    ISO-8859-1

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Projectworldimpact.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Projectworldimpact.com main page’s claimed encoding is iso-8859-1. Changing it to UTF-8 can be a good choice, as this format is commonly used for encoding all over the web and thus their visitors won’t have any troubles with symbol transcription or reading.

Social Sharing Optimization

projectworldimpact.com

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Project World Impact. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: