7.6 sec in total
497 ms
6.7 sec
386 ms
Click here to check amazing Pronteff content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about pronteff.com
Pronteff IT Solutions, through the strategic partnership with IBM, is catering to BFSI, Media, & Advertising industries with FullStack.
Visit pronteff.comWe analyzed Pronteff.com page load time and found that the first response time was 497 ms and then it took 7.1 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 85% of websites can load faster.
pronteff.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value4.6 s
13/100
10%
Value13.9 s
0/100
25%
Value15.1 s
1/100
10%
Value1,610 ms
12/100
30%
Value0.002
100/100
15%
Value14.6 s
8/100
10%
497 ms
1680 ms
75 ms
442 ms
677 ms
Our browser made a total of 81 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 80% of them (65 requests) were addressed to the original Pronteff.com, 14% (11 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 4% (3 requests) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (2.3 sec) belongs to the original domain Pronteff.com.
Page size can be reduced by 216.7 kB (23%)
961.4 kB
744.7 kB
In fact, the total size of Pronteff.com main page is 961.4 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 65% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 411.0 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 197.2 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 197.2 kB or 86% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 12.6 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Pronteff needs image optimization as it can save up to 12.6 kB or 15% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.
Potential reduce by 205 B
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.
Potential reduce by 6.6 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Pronteff.com has all CSS files already compressed.
Number of requests can be reduced by 55 (87%)
63
8
The browser has sent 63 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Pronteff. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 26 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 31 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
pronteff.com
497 ms
pronteff.com
1680 ms
js
75 ms
wp-emoji-release.min.js
442 ms
style.min.css
677 ms
theme.min.css
697 ms
blocks.style.build.css
706 ms
elementor-icons.min.css
712 ms
frontend.min.css
957 ms
post-203.css
921 ms
global.css
1100 ms
js_composer.min.css
1394 ms
css
34 ms
main.min.css
1414 ms
icomoon-the7-font.min.css
950 ms
all.min.css
1189 ms
custom-scrollbar.min.css
1199 ms
wpbakery.min.css
1434 ms
post-type.min.css
1442 ms
css-vars.css
1627 ms
custom.css
1899 ms
media.css
1651 ms
mega-menu.css
1672 ms
the7-elements-albums-portfolio.css
1687 ms
post-type-dynamic.css
1798 ms
style.css
1860 ms
elementor-global.min.css
1886 ms
style.min.css
1912 ms
headings.min.css
1935 ms
css
56 ms
jquery.min.js
2267 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
2092 ms
above-the-fold.min.js
2119 ms
ultimate-params.min.js
2140 ms
headings.min.js
2149 ms
css
18 ms
animate.min.css
1982 ms
rs6.css
2165 ms
choices.min.css
2166 ms
jquery.timepicker.css
2273 ms
flatpickr.min.css
2272 ms
wpforms-full.min.css
2273 ms
scc-c2.min.js
5 ms
main.min.js
2309 ms
rbtools.min.js
1901 ms
rs6.min.js
2143 ms
jquery-mousewheel.min.js
1966 ms
custom-scrollbar.min.js
1962 ms
post-type.min.js
1753 ms
wp-embed.min.js
1862 ms
js_composer_front.min.js
1957 ms
vc-waypoints.min.js
1816 ms
choices.min.js
1739 ms
jquery.validate.min.js
1794 ms
flatpickr.min.js
1641 ms
jquery.timepicker.min.js
1651 ms
jquery.inputmask.min.js
1963 ms
mailcheck.min.js
1720 ms
punycode.min.js
1540 ms
jquery.payment.min.js
1576 ms
wpforms.min.js
1611 ms
congruent_pentagon.png
1015 ms
pronteff-rectangle-logo-1.png
2244 ms
ibm_partner.jpg
2248 ms
dummy.png
2248 ms
Pronteff-Footer-logo.png
2249 ms
core-values.jpg
2177 ms
pxiEyp8kv8JHgFVrJJfedw.ttf
119 ms
pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLGT9Z1xlEA.ttf
119 ms
pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLEj6Z1xlEA.ttf
142 ms
pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLCz7Z1xlEA.ttf
155 ms
6xK-dSZaM9iE8KbpRA_LJ3z8mH9BOJvgkM0o58a-xw.ttf
157 ms
6xK-dSZaM9iE8KbpRA_LJ3z8mH9BOJvgkP8o58a-xw.ttf
155 ms
6xK-dSZaM9iE8KbpRA_LJ3z8mH9BOJvgkCEv58a-xw.ttf
156 ms
6xK-dSZaM9iE8KbpRA_LJ3z8mH9BOJvgkBgv58a-xw.ttf
156 ms
memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsjZ0B4gaVc.ttf
155 ms
memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsgH1x4gaVc.ttf
157 ms
memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsg-1x4gaVc.ttf
158 ms
icomoon-the7-font.ttf
2174 ms
fa-solid-900.woff
2117 ms
fa-regular-400.woff
2116 ms
pronteff.com accessibility score
ARIA
These are opportunities to improve the usage of ARIA in your application which may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
button, link, and menuitem elements do not have accessible names.
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Links do not have a discernible name
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
pronteff.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Serves images with low resolution
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Browser errors were logged to the console
pronteff.com SEO score
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
Links are not crawlable
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Pronteff.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Pronteff.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
pronteff.com
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Pronteff. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: