Tools & Wizards About Us
propak.net screenshot

Report Summary

  • 0

    Performance

  • 0

    Accessibility

  • 0

    Best Practices

  • 0

    SEO

propak.net

ProPak Medical Deployment Systems | Ergonomically designed by Paramedics for Paramedics

Page Load Speed

2.8 sec in total

First Response

628 ms

Resources Loaded

1.8 sec

Page Rendered

307 ms

propak.net screenshot

About Website

Visit propak.net now to see the best up-to-date Pro Pak content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about propak.net

  PROPAK's deployment kits are engineered to maximize space and incorporate innovations. They accept a full line of pullout modules, so that you can

Visit propak.net

Key Findings

We analyzed Propak.net page load time and found that the first response time was 628 ms and then it took 2.2 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 45% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

propak.net performance score

0

Network Requests Diagram

propak.net

628 ms

wp-emoji-release.min.js

114 ms

style.css

655 ms

font-awesome.css

193 ms

animations.css

197 ms

Our browser made a total of 65 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 91% of them (59 requests) were addressed to the original Propak.net, 5% (3 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 3% (2 requests) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (722 ms) belongs to the original domain Propak.net.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 1.1 MB (58%)

Content Size

2.0 MB

After Optimization

820.7 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Propak.net main page is 2.0 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 50% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 702.6 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-82%

Potential reduce by 102.7 kB

  • Original 124.5 kB
  • After minification 120.2 kB
  • After compression 21.8 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 102.7 kB or 82% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-5%

Potential reduce by 30.7 kB

  • Original 608.7 kB
  • After minification 578.0 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Pro Pak images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-78%

Potential reduce by 550.1 kB

  • Original 702.6 kB
  • After minification 611.1 kB
  • After compression 152.5 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 550.1 kB or 78% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-87%

Potential reduce by 462.5 kB

  • Original 531.0 kB
  • After minification 452.4 kB
  • After compression 68.4 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Propak.net needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 462.5 kB or 87% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 19 (33%)

Requests Now

57

After Optimization

38

  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 57 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Pro Pak. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 13 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 8 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

propak.net

propak.net

628 ms

wp-emoji-release.min.js

wp-emoji-release.min.js

114 ms

style.css

style.css

655 ms

font-awesome.css

font-awesome.css

193 ms

animations.css

animations.css

197 ms

media.css

media.css

198 ms

jquery.js

jquery.js

267 ms

jquery-migrate.min.js

jquery-migrate.min.js

176 ms

css

css

17 ms

css

css

30 ms

soliloquy.css

soliloquy.css

195 ms

style.css

style.css

210 ms

comment-reply.min.js

comment-reply.min.js

216 ms

modernizr-min.js

modernizr-min.js

217 ms

jquery.carouFredSel-6.2.1-min.js

jquery.carouFredSel-6.2.1-min.js

258 ms

jquery.cycle.js

jquery.cycle.js

339 ms

jquery.prettyPhoto-min.js

jquery.prettyPhoto-min.js

283 ms

jquery.flexslider-min.js

jquery.flexslider-min.js

283 ms

jquery.fitvids-min.js

jquery.fitvids-min.js

285 ms

main.js

main.js

722 ms

wp-embed.min.js

wp-embed.min.js

349 ms

soliloquy-min.js

soliloquy-min.js

350 ms

page_title_bg.png

page_title_bg.png

78 ms

ergonomically.png

ergonomically.png

271 ms

pattern1.png

pattern1.png

71 ms

propak-logo2.png

propak-logo2.png

71 ms

ambu.png

ambu.png

334 ms

md02-52x50.png

md02-52x50.png

72 ms

md03-52x50.png

md03-52x50.png

72 ms

psa35p1-52x50.png

psa35p1-52x50.png

248 ms

SA06-52x50.png

SA06-52x50.png

248 ms

pso20011-52x50.png

pso20011-52x50.png

249 ms

PK08PK09-52x50.png

PK08PK09-52x50.png

249 ms

FI04ALS-52x50.png

FI04ALS-52x50.png

249 ms

FI0405-52x50.png

FI0405-52x50.png

250 ms

f101a-52x50.png

f101a-52x50.png

251 ms

DE01A_head-52x50.png

DE01A_head-52x50.png

250 ms

de01_head-52x50.png

de01_head-52x50.png

250 ms

dco4_main-52x50.png

dco4_main-52x50.png

250 ms

dc03main2-52x50.png

dc03main2-52x50.png

251 ms

dc02-52x50.png

dc02-52x50.png

260 ms

DC01c-52x50.png

DC01c-52x50.png

262 ms

Image22-52x50.png

Image22-52x50.png

266 ms

sa01b-52x50.png

sa01b-52x50.png

268 ms

mt02-52x50.png

mt02-52x50.png

306 ms

pss00-52x50.png

pss00-52x50.png

320 ms

mi01a-52x50.png

mi01a-52x50.png

323 ms

qrcode.png

qrcode.png

330 ms

preloader.gif

preloader.gif

335 ms

left.png

left.png

369 ms

right.png

right.png

385 ms

circle.png

circle.png

389 ms

circle-hover.png

circle-hover.png

398 ms

pause.png

pause.png

399 ms

play.png

play.png

403 ms

video.png

video.png

434 ms

slider-arrows-horizontal.png

slider-arrows-horizontal.png

449 ms

slider-dots.png

slider-dots.png

454 ms

catalog.jpg

catalog.jpg

259 ms

jizaRExUiTo99u79D0KEwA.ttf

jizaRExUiTo99u79D0KEwA.ttf

174 ms

jizfRExUiTo99u79B_mh0O6tKA.ttf

jizfRExUiTo99u79B_mh0O6tKA.ttf

175 ms

bWt97fPFfRzkCa9Jlp6IacVcWQ.ttf

bWt97fPFfRzkCa9Jlp6IacVcWQ.ttf

175 ms

icomoon.woff

icomoon.woff

394 ms

ergonomically.png

ergonomically.png

209 ms

catalog.jpg

catalog.jpg

277 ms

SEO Factors

propak.net SEO score

0

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Propak.net can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Propak.net main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

propak.net

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Pro Pak. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: