2.3 sec in total
61 ms
830 ms
1.4 sec
Click here to check amazing Proposable content for United States. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about proposable.com
Are you in need of proposal software to make your sales process more efficient? Proposable has you covered.
Visit proposable.comWe analyzed Proposable.com page load time and found that the first response time was 61 ms and then it took 2.2 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 40% of websites can load faster.
proposable.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value3.2 s
43/100
10%
Value5.6 s
17/100
25%
Value3.8 s
84/100
10%
Value390 ms
68/100
30%
Value0
100/100
15%
Value7.4 s
48/100
10%
61 ms
119 ms
31 ms
68 ms
142 ms
Our browser made a total of 16 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 56% of them (9 requests) were addressed to the original Proposable.com, 19% (3 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 13% (2 requests) were made to Ssl.google-analytics.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (325 ms) relates to the external source Fonts.gstatic.com.
Page size can be reduced by 263.4 kB (32%)
816.3 kB
552.9 kB
In fact, the total size of Proposable.com main page is 816.3 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 30% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 454.0 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 4.9 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 4.9 kB or 67% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 916 B
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Proposable images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 139.0 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 139.0 kB or 66% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 118.6 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Proposable.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 118.6 kB or 82% of the original size.
We found no issues to fix!
9
9
The browser has sent 9 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Proposable. According to our analytics all requests are already optimized.
proposable.com
61 ms
proposable.com
119 ms
marketing-d3e828b0bee31dccf9667e5b795f761f.css
31 ms
marketing-55f74d1b524889ad71926515231d5819.js
68 ms
css
142 ms
ga.js
194 ms
diamond-ae7d6ce200f1e54b8e307979595154e4.png
155 ms
proposable-icon-cc85e4194873be0bc82aa7c7bab5e39a.png
34 ms
homepage-6af453bbb4233fdfca5c386778e3c47a.png
230 ms
homepage-gradient-f8884b825a876693ccb0bd81c8a7d66c.png
131 ms
v0SdcGFAl2aezM9Vq_aFTQ.ttf
268 ms
nj47mAZe0mYUIySgfn0wpQ.ttf
312 ms
DvlFBScY1r-FMtZSYIYoYw.ttf
325 ms
fontawesome-webfont-05fb9ffe12798cd49ed925fe8e5dcbcd.woff
221 ms
__utm.gif
33 ms
collect
172 ms
proposable.com accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
proposable.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Displays images with incorrect aspect ratio
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
proposable.com SEO score
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Proposable.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Proposable.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
proposable.com
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Proposable. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: