Tools & Wizards About Us
proposalotg.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 54

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    71% of other websites

  • 71

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 36% of websites

  • 58

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    20% of websites

  • 81

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    42% of websites

proposalotg.com

POTG - Best CRM software providers in Ahmedabad, Surat, Baroda

Page Load Speed

4.7 sec in total

First Response

531 ms

Resources Loaded

3.9 sec

Page Rendered

347 ms

proposalotg.com screenshot

About Website

Click here to check amazing Proposalotg content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about proposalotg.com

POTG - A leading best CRM software providers company in india including Ahmedabad, Surat, Baroda,we help companies improve their business tactics by easing their operations

Visit proposalotg.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Proposalotg.com page load time and found that the first response time was 531 ms and then it took 4.2 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 65% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

proposalotg.com performance score

54

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value4.9 s

10/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value9.0 s

1/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value7.2 s

29/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value140 ms

96/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.02

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value6.0 s

64/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

proposalotg.com

531 ms

js

92 ms

style.css

252 ms

bootstrap.min.css

729 ms

groc_css.css

497 ms

Our browser made a total of 47 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 89% of them (42 requests) were addressed to the original Proposalotg.com, 6% (3 requests) were made to Cdnjs.cloudflare.com and 2% (1 request) were made to Googletagmanager.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.9 sec) belongs to the original domain Proposalotg.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 38.9 kB (3%)

Content Size

1.4 MB

After Optimization

1.4 MB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Proposalotg.com main page is 1.4 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 40% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 1.3 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-78%

Potential reduce by 15.7 kB

  • Original 20.1 kB
  • After minification 17.2 kB
  • After compression 4.4 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 2.9 kB, which is 15% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 15.7 kB or 78% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-2%

Potential reduce by 22.2 kB

  • Original 1.3 MB
  • After minification 1.3 MB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Proposalotg images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 19 B

  • Original 65.5 kB
  • After minification 65.5 kB
  • After compression 65.5 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

CSS Optimization

-3%

Potential reduce by 1.0 kB

  • Original 35.4 kB
  • After minification 35.4 kB
  • After compression 34.4 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Proposalotg.com has all CSS files already compressed.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 12 (29%)

Requests Now

41

After Optimization

29

  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 41 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Proposalotg. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 5 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 9 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

proposalotg.com

proposalotg.com

531 ms

js

js

92 ms

style.css

style.css

252 ms

bootstrap.min.css

bootstrap.min.css

729 ms

groc_css.css

groc_css.css

497 ms

hover-min.css

hover-min.css

499 ms

mediaqueries_gros.css

mediaqueries_gros.css

498 ms

mediaqueries.css

mediaqueries.css

497 ms

jquery-3.2.1.min.js

jquery-3.2.1.min.js

759 ms

bootstrap.min.js

bootstrap.min.js

753 ms

font-awesome.min.css

font-awesome.min.css

58 ms

animate.css

animate.css

741 ms

animate.min.css

animate.min.css

65 ms

aos.css

aos.css

747 ms

aos.js

aos.js

745 ms

scc-c2.min.js

scc-c2.min.js

8 ms

logo.png

logo.png

250 ms

banner4.png

banner4.png

1682 ms

banner2.png

banner2.png

1235 ms

quick_ord.png

quick_ord.png

251 ms

sell_fast.png

sell_fast.png

251 ms

train.png

train.png

253 ms

web_banner.png

web_banner.png

1230 ms

laptop_activity.png

laptop_activity.png

994 ms

cus_con.png

cus_con.png

744 ms

lead1.png

lead1.png

504 ms

lead2.png

lead2.png

759 ms

lead3.png

lead3.png

993 ms

lead5.png

lead5.png

1010 ms

lead7.png

lead7.png

1243 ms

lead8.png

lead8.png

1249 ms

lead9.png

lead9.png

1264 ms

lead10.png

lead10.png

1475 ms

cli1.png

cli1.png

1490 ms

cli2.png

cli2.png

1490 ms

cli3.png

cli3.png

1497 ms

cli4.png

cli4.png

1516 ms

cli5.png

cli5.png

1725 ms

cli6.png

cli6.png

1736 ms

cli7.jpg

cli7.jpg

1741 ms

cli8.png

cli8.png

1747 ms

lithelogo.png

lithelogo.png

1769 ms

free_trial.png

free_trial.png

1925 ms

fontawesome-webfont.woff

fontawesome-webfont.woff

13 ms

RalewayRegular.woff

RalewayRegular.woff

1808 ms

glyphicons-halflings-regular.woff

glyphicons-halflings-regular.woff

1821 ms

RalewayRegular.ttf

RalewayRegular.ttf

492 ms

Accessibility Review

proposalotg.com accessibility score

71

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Best practices

These items highlight common accessibility best practices.

Impact

Issue

High

[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.

Best Practices

proposalotg.com best practices score

58

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Serves images with low resolution

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

High

Page has valid source maps

SEO Factors

proposalotg.com SEO score

81

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Proposalotg.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Proposalotg.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

proposalotg.com

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Proposalotg. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: