4.7 sec in total
587 ms
3.9 sec
261 ms
Visit propr.me now to see the best up-to-date ProPR content for Russia and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about propr.me
Propr.me создан для людей, находящихся в поиске новых идей, необычных путей продвижения своего продукта, бренда или, может быть, себя. Propr.me хотел бы вдохновлять. Мы ищем идеи и проявление креатива...
Visit propr.meWe analyzed Propr.me page load time and found that the first response time was 587 ms and then it took 4.1 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 65% of websites can load faster.
propr.me performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value4.9 s
11/100
10%
Value8.5 s
1/100
25%
Value10.0 s
9/100
10%
Value760 ms
39/100
30%
Value0.244
51/100
15%
Value13.7 s
10/100
10%
587 ms
851 ms
71 ms
278 ms
280 ms
Our browser made a total of 104 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 83% of them (86 requests) were addressed to the original Propr.me, 3% (3 requests) were made to Mc.yandex.com and 2% (2 requests) were made to Mc.yandex.ru. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.2 sec) belongs to the original domain Propr.me.
Page size can be reduced by 187.0 kB (21%)
879.9 kB
692.8 kB
In fact, the total size of Propr.me main page is 879.9 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 45% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 512.1 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 61.9 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 61.9 kB or 80% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 21.1 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. ProPR images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 100.6 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 100.6 kB or 20% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 3.3 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Propr.me needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 3.3 kB or 13% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 45 (45%)
100
55
The browser has sent 100 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of ProPR. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 19 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 15 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
www.propr.me
587 ms
tag.js
851 ms
js
71 ms
menu.css
278 ms
style.css
280 ms
media.css
282 ms
prettyPhoto.css
278 ms
woocommerce-layout.css
287 ms
woocommerce.css
288 ms
menu.js
414 ms
gdsr.css.php
442 ms
rating.css
414 ms
sitestyle.css
419 ms
screen.min.css
427 ms
shadowbox.css
426 ms
extras.css
550 ms
pagenavi-css.css
552 ms
jquery.js
563 ms
gdsr.js
572 ms
init.js
575 ms
jquery.dimensions.js
577 ms
jquery.bgiframe.js
687 ms
jquery.lightbox.js
689 ms
jquery.tooltip.js
703 ms
lightbox-gallery.js
707 ms
lightbox-gallery.css
708 ms
api.js
44 ms
top100.jcn
370 ms
zp.js
642 ms
front.min.js
635 ms
top100.jcn
947 ms
recaptcha__en.js
70 ms
3_0_FFFFFFFF_EFEFEFFF_0_pageviews
628 ms
shad.jpg
207 ms
pr_shapka.jpg
340 ms
search.gif
206 ms
facebook.png
207 ms
twitter.png
205 ms
vk.jpg
205 ms
rss.gif
346 ms
idea_znak.gif
345 ms
timthumb.php
369 ms
timthumb.php
363 ms
timthumb.php
346 ms
timthumb.php
851 ms
timthumb.php
983 ms
timthumb.php
1207 ms
timthumb.php
485 ms
timthumb.php
503 ms
sob_znak.gif
509 ms
li.gif
623 ms
reviz_znak.jpg
640 ms
timthumb.php
653 ms
timthumb.php
762 ms
timthumb.php
781 ms
timthumb.php
795 ms
timthumb.php
903 ms
timthumb.php
922 ms
news_znak.gif
936 ms
fishka_znak.gif
988 ms
fishka_bg.gif
1040 ms
article_znak.gif
1060 ms
timthumb.php
1221 ms
arhiv_znak.gif
1116 ms
arhiv_bg.gif
1129 ms
timthumb.php
1182 ms
timthumb.php
1200 ms
timthumb.php
1233 ms
timthumb.php
1249 ms
timthumb.php
1124 ms
timthumb.php
1143 ms
timthumb.php
1149 ms
timthumb.php
1165 ms
timthumb.php
1201 ms
timthumb.php
1087 ms
timthumb.php
1125 ms
timthumb.php
1141 ms
timthumb.php
1150 ms
timthumb.php
1150 ms
timthumb.php
1177 ms
timthumb.php
1081 ms
crea_znak.gif
1104 ms
write_znak.gif
1116 ms
timthumb.php
1018 ms
timthumb.php
1016 ms
timthumb.php
1031 ms
hit
255 ms
watch.js
2 ms
version.js
142 ms
all.js
776 ms
advert.gif
136 ms
timthumb.php
947 ms
book_znak.gif
962 ms
timthumb.php
969 ms
forum_znak.gif
932 ms
sync_cookie_image_decide
135 ms
forum_bg.gif
894 ms
forumgra.png
899 ms
redbg.jpg
914 ms
hit
516 ms
1
136 ms
counter2
262 ms
jquery.min.js
569 ms
woocommerce-smallscreen.css
142 ms
propr.me accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
<frame> or <iframe> elements do not have a title
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Links do not have a discernible name
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
propr.me best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Serves images with low resolution
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Browser errors were logged to the console
propr.me SEO score
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document doesn't use legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
RU
RU
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Propr.me can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that Russian is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Propr.me main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
propr.me
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of ProPR. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: