Tools & Wizards About Us
proqualityoffice.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 14

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    26% of other websites

  • 90

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 74% of websites

  • 67

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    24% of websites

  • 93

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    83% of websites

proqualityoffice.com

Pro Quality Office Cleaning - Seattle janitorial services

Page Load Speed

4.3 sec in total

First Response

120 ms

Resources Loaded

3.8 sec

Page Rendered

319 ms

proqualityoffice.com screenshot

About Website

Welcome to proqualityoffice.com homepage info - get ready to check Pro Quality Office best content right away, or after learning these important things about proqualityoffice.com

We provide quality janitorial and office cleaning services for businesses of all sizes in the Seattle area. We are the best commercial cleaning service for your business

Visit proqualityoffice.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Proqualityoffice.com page load time and found that the first response time was 120 ms and then it took 4.2 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 65% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

proqualityoffice.com performance score

14

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value4.9 s

10/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value6.6 s

8/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value8.3 s

19/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value2,750 ms

3/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.236

53/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value18.2 s

3/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

proqualityoffice.com

120 ms

proqualityoffice.com

234 ms

www.proqualityoffice.com

118 ms

www.proqualityoffice.com

1913 ms

wp-emoji-release.min.js

78 ms

Our browser made a total of 84 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 80% of them (67 requests) were addressed to the original Proqualityoffice.com, 6% (5 requests) were made to Youtube.com and 4% (3 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.9 sec) belongs to the original domain Proqualityoffice.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 119.0 kB (10%)

Content Size

1.2 MB

After Optimization

1.0 MB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Proqualityoffice.com main page is 1.2 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 80% of websites need less resources to load and that’s why Accessify’s recommendations for optimization and resource minification can be helpful for this project. Images take 507.1 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-80%

Potential reduce by 61.2 kB

  • Original 76.4 kB
  • After minification 72.1 kB
  • After compression 15.2 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 61.2 kB or 80% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-3%

Potential reduce by 14.6 kB

  • Original 507.1 kB
  • After minification 492.6 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Pro Quality Office images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-10%

Potential reduce by 36.2 kB

  • Original 370.5 kB
  • After minification 370.2 kB
  • After compression 334.3 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

CSS Optimization

-4%

Potential reduce by 7.1 kB

  • Original 201.5 kB
  • After minification 201.1 kB
  • After compression 194.4 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Proqualityoffice.com has all CSS files already compressed.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 47 (62%)

Requests Now

76

After Optimization

29

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 76 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Pro Quality Office. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 24 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 19 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

proqualityoffice.com

proqualityoffice.com

120 ms

proqualityoffice.com

proqualityoffice.com

234 ms

www.proqualityoffice.com

www.proqualityoffice.com

118 ms

www.proqualityoffice.com

www.proqualityoffice.com

1913 ms

wp-emoji-release.min.js

wp-emoji-release.min.js

78 ms

css

css

42 ms

styles.css

styles.css

140 ms

animate.css

animate.css

177 ms

pe-easy-slider.css

pe-easy-slider.css

166 ms

pe-recent-posts.css

pe-recent-posts.css

168 ms

settings.css

settings.css

169 ms

style.css

style.css

172 ms

dashicons.min.css

dashicons.min.css

198 ms

style.css

style.css

230 ms

bootstrap.min.css

bootstrap.min.css

283 ms

bootstrap-theme.min.css

bootstrap-theme.min.css

227 ms

font-awesome.min.css

font-awesome.min.css

230 ms

template.css

template.css

235 ms

template-responsive.css

template-responsive.css

255 ms

custom.css

custom.css

291 ms

style.css

style.css

291 ms

js_composer.min.css

js_composer.min.css

405 ms

jquery.js

jquery.js

351 ms

jquery-migrate.min.js

jquery-migrate.min.js

311 ms

bootstrap.min.js

bootstrap.min.js

339 ms

pe-easy-slider.js

pe-easy-slider.js

344 ms

pe-recent-posts.js

pe-recent-posts.js

348 ms

jquery.themepunch.tools.min.js

jquery.themepunch.tools.min.js

375 ms

jquery.themepunch.revolution.min.js

jquery.themepunch.revolution.min.js

463 ms

theme-script.js

theme-script.js

402 ms

css

css

34 ms

jquery.form.min.js

jquery.form.min.js

459 ms

scripts.js

scripts.js

459 ms

comment-reply.min.js

comment-reply.min.js

475 ms

hoverIntent.min.js

hoverIntent.min.js

475 ms

maxmegamenu.js

maxmegamenu.js

508 ms

wp-embed.min.js

wp-embed.min.js

508 ms

js_composer_front.min.js

js_composer_front.min.js

508 ms

analytics.js

analytics.js

68 ms

7f46341e3c3ce7283f706293f.js

7f46341e3c3ce7283f706293f.js

285 ms

phone.png

phone.png

250 ms

office-cleaning-logo-new.png

office-cleaning-logo-new.png

279 ms

proqualityoffice_bg.jpg

proqualityoffice_bg.jpg

248 ms

cleaning-slider01-1.jpg

cleaning-slider01-1.jpg

308 ms

pe-rev-background.png

pe-rev-background.png

121 ms

cleaning-slider02.jpg

cleaning-slider02.jpg

279 ms

bucket.png

bucket.png

277 ms

brush02.png

brush02.png

308 ms

wisp.png

wisp.png

328 ms

table.png

table.png

330 ms

buttle.png

buttle.png

328 ms

vacuum.png

vacuum.png

330 ms

brush.png

brush.png

364 ms

indastrial.png

indastrial.png

366 ms

babble.png

babble.png

367 ms

office_cleaning02.jpg

office_cleaning02.jpg

658 ms

estimate-banner.jpg

estimate-banner.jpg

445 ms

phone-icon.png

phone-icon.png

443 ms

email-icon.png

email-icon.png

657 ms

location-icon.png

location-icon.png

656 ms

O0atIdABbiU

O0atIdABbiU

313 ms

str.png

str.png

600 ms

backtotop.png

backtotop.png

601 ms

minus.png

minus.png

540 ms

plus.png

plus.png

682 ms

revolution.extension.slideanims.min.js

revolution.extension.slideanims.min.js

603 ms

revolution.extension.layeranimation.min.js

revolution.extension.layeranimation.min.js

608 ms

revolution.extension.navigation.min.js

revolution.extension.navigation.min.js

611 ms

collect

collect

20 ms

Z9XPDmFATg-N1PLtLOOxvIHl9amE1Co.ttf

Z9XPDmFATg-N1PLtLOOxvIHl9amE1Co.ttf

22 ms

fontawesome-webfont.woff

fontawesome-webfont.woff

542 ms

js

js

150 ms

www-player.css

www-player.css

8 ms

www-embed-player.js

www-embed-player.js

41 ms

base.js

base.js

112 ms

ad_status.js

ad_status.js

270 ms

zsuYbLQL7cfgkPw96EIg59zP1zcoLT-EKB-9U6ATFis.js

zsuYbLQL7cfgkPw96EIg59zP1zcoLT-EKB-9U6ATFis.js

255 ms

embed.js

embed.js

161 ms

loader.gif

loader.gif

90 ms

rev-prev.png

rev-prev.png

62 ms

rev-next.png

rev-next.png

65 ms

KFOmCnqEu92Fr1Mu4mxP.ttf

KFOmCnqEu92Fr1Mu4mxP.ttf

16 ms

KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmEU9fBBc9.ttf

KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmEU9fBBc9.ttf

45 ms

id

id

36 ms

Accessibility Review

proqualityoffice.com accessibility score

90

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

<frame> or <iframe> elements do not have a title

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Tables and lists

These are opportunities to improve the experience of reading tabular or list data using assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

List items (<li>) are not contained within <ul> or <ol> parent elements.

Best Practices

proqualityoffice.com best practices score

67

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Displays images with incorrect aspect ratio

High

Serves images with low resolution

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Page has valid source maps

SEO Factors

proqualityoffice.com SEO score

93

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have descriptive text

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Proqualityoffice.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Proqualityoffice.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

proqualityoffice.com

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Pro Quality Office. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: