Report Summary

  • 59

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    74% of other websites

  • 45

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 19% of websites

  • 75

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    35% of websites

  • 91

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    70% of websites

protecheg.net

没带套子让他c了一天|免费|完整版

Page Load Speed

7.3 sec in total

First Response

1.1 sec

Resources Loaded

6 sec

Page Rendered

210 ms

protecheg.net screenshot

About Website

Welcome to protecheg.net homepage info - get ready to check Protecheg best content right away, or after learning these important things about protecheg.net

⛱ 没带套子让他c了一天⛱ 位于安图县濮阳文雯商贸公司,是网友����极力推荐w乳液939永久w78、秋葵丝瓜茄子草莓榴莲樱桃等内容无需下载手机在线,全网国产、日韩、欧美、各类影视全部免费观看!

Visit protecheg.net

Key Findings

We analyzed Protecheg.net page load time and found that the first response time was 1.1 sec and then it took 6.2 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 80% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

protecheg.net performance score

59

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value2.4 s

72/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value2.7 s

86/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value13.0 s

2/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value520 ms

56/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.126

83/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value14.4 s

9/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

protecheg.net

1122 ms

m8tro-bootstrap-pie.js

427 ms

dedecms.css

882 ms

js-sdk-pro.min.js

1232 ms

js-sdk-pro.min.js

1061 ms

Our browser made a total of 61 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 74% of them (45 requests) were addressed to the original Protecheg.net, 10% (6 requests) were made to Hm.baidu.com and 7% (4 requests) were made to Collect-v6.51.la. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (2.8 sec) belongs to the original domain Protecheg.net.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 89.3 kB (18%)

Content Size

492.4 kB

After Optimization

403.1 kB

In fact, the total size of Protecheg.net main page is 492.4 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 30% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 411.2 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-72%

Potential reduce by 15.5 kB

  • Original 21.4 kB
  • After minification 18.8 kB
  • After compression 6.0 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 2.7 kB, which is 12% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 15.5 kB or 72% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-6%

Potential reduce by 25.6 kB

  • Original 411.2 kB
  • After minification 385.6 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Protecheg images are well optimized though.

CSS Optimization

-81%

Potential reduce by 48.2 kB

  • Original 59.8 kB
  • After minification 50.4 kB
  • After compression 11.6 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Protecheg.net needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 48.2 kB or 81% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 27 (51%)

Requests Now

53

After Optimization

26

The browser has sent 53 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Protecheg. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 4 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 4 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Accessibility Review

protecheg.net accessibility score

45

Accessibility Issues

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

<frame> or <iframe> elements do not have a title

Internationalization and localization

These are opportunities to improve the interpretation of your content by users in different locales.

Impact

Issue

High

<html> element does not have a [lang] attribute

Best practices

These items highlight common accessibility best practices.

Impact

Issue

High

[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.

Best Practices

protecheg.net best practices score

75

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

High

Page has valid source maps

SEO Factors

protecheg.net SEO score

91

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    N/A

  • Language Claimed

    N/A

  • Encoding

    GB2312

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Protecheg.net can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Unfortunately we cannot identify language used on the page (probably there is a mix of languages, too little text or something else) and no language is claimed in <html> or <meta> tags either. Our system also found out that Protecheg.net main page’s claimed encoding is gb2312. Changing it to UTF-8 can be a good choice, as this format is commonly used for encoding all over the web and thus their visitors won’t have any troubles with symbol transcription or reading.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Protecheg. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: