14.1 sec in total
2.9 sec
11 sec
219 ms
Visit protectivepolymers.com now to see the best up-to-date Protectivepolymers content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about protectivepolymers.com
Protective Polymers are specialist manufacturers of High Performance Roofing Membranes and Anti-Graffiti coatings for the construction industry.
Visit protectivepolymers.comWe analyzed Protectivepolymers.com page load time and found that the first response time was 2.9 sec and then it took 11.2 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 90% of websites can load faster.
protectivepolymers.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value8.8 s
0/100
10%
Value11.4 s
0/100
25%
Value20.0 s
0/100
10%
Value130 ms
96/100
30%
Value0.143
78/100
15%
Value13.6 s
11/100
10%
2866 ms
393 ms
238 ms
327 ms
563 ms
Our browser made a total of 75 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 53% of them (40 requests) were addressed to the original Protectivepolymers.com, 25% (19 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 7% (5 requests) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (4.2 sec) belongs to the original domain Protectivepolymers.com.
Page size can be reduced by 306.1 kB (16%)
1.9 MB
1.6 MB
In fact, the total size of Protectivepolymers.com main page is 1.9 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 50% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 1.4 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 76.4 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 76.4 kB or 82% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 176.1 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Protectivepolymers needs image optimization as it can save up to 176.1 kB or 12% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.
Potential reduce by 18.6 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.
Potential reduce by 35.0 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Protectivepolymers.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 35.0 kB or 20% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 41 (84%)
49
8
The browser has sent 49 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Protectivepolymers. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 21 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 22 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
protectivepolymers.com
2866 ms
style.min.css
393 ms
base.css
238 ms
lightbox.css
327 ms
style.css
563 ms
responsive.css
246 ms
animate.min.css
26 ms
css
30 ms
owl.carousel.min.css
34 ms
intlTelInput.css
2275 ms
dynamic-mobmenu.css
330 ms
css
18 ms
css
25 ms
mobmenu-icons.css
330 ms
mobmenu.css
432 ms
jquery.min.js
547 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
524 ms
mobmenu.js
412 ms
jquery-3.6.0.min.js
14 ms
font-awesome.min.css
335 ms
animate.min.css
355 ms
bootstrap.min.css
488 ms
marttalk-theme.css
417 ms
dashicons.min.css
613 ms
display-opinions-light.css
464 ms
font-awesome.min.css
392 ms
modernizr.min.js
423 ms
bootstrap.min.js
591 ms
bootstrap-hover.js
494 ms
jquery.lightbox.js
504 ms
jquery.sticky.js
544 ms
wow.min.js
576 ms
jquery.validate.min.js
4179 ms
owl.carousel.min.js
10 ms
app.js
748 ms
jquery.counterup.min.js
22 ms
jquery.intlTelInput.min.js
4084 ms
underscore.min.js
745 ms
backbone.min.js
693 ms
front-end-deps.js
866 ms
front-end.js
906 ms
css
161 ms
css
20 ms
global-poly.jpg
143 ms
PROTECTIVE_POLYMNERS_LOGO_PRINT.png
202 ms
imgpsh_fullsize_anim-5.png
887 ms
iso.jpg
204 ms
Made_in_Britain_logo_CMYK.jpg
1227 ms
PROTECTIVE_POLYMNERS_LOGO_PRINT.jpg
515 ms
fontawesome-webfont.woff
815 ms
o-0mIpQlx3QUlC5A4PNB6Ryti20_6n1iPHjcz6L1SoM-jCpoiyD9A-9U6Vc.ttf
85 ms
o-0mIpQlx3QUlC5A4PNB6Ryti20_6n1iPHjcz6L1SoM-jCpoiyD9A-9a6Vc.ttf
81 ms
o-0mIpQlx3QUlC5A4PNB6Ryti20_6n1iPHjcz6L1SoM-jCpoiyDPA-9a6Vc.ttf
85 ms
o-0mIpQlx3QUlC5A4PNB6Ryti20_6n1iPHjcz6L1SoM-jCpoiyCjA-9a6Vc.ttf
84 ms
o-0mIpQlx3QUlC5A4PNB6Ryti20_6n1iPHjcz6L1SoM-jCpoiyB9A-9a6Vc.ttf
98 ms
o-0mIpQlx3QUlC5A4PNB6Ryti20_6n1iPHjcz6L1SoM-jCpoiyD9Au9a6Vc.ttf
86 ms
o-0mIpQlx3QUlC5A4PNB6Ryti20_6n1iPHjcz6L1SoM-jCpoiyAjBO9a6Vc.ttf
99 ms
o-0mIpQlx3QUlC5A4PNB6Ryti20_6n1iPHjcz6L1SoM-jCpoiyAaBO9a6Vc.ttf
99 ms
o-0mIpQlx3QUlC5A4PNB6Ryti20_6n1iPHjcz6L1SoM-jCpoiyB9BO9a6Vc.ttf
159 ms
o-0mIpQlx3QUlC5A4PNB6Ryti20_6n1iPHjcz6L1SoM-jCpoiyBUBO9a6Vc.ttf
98 ms
JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCtZ6Hw5aX8.ttf
99 ms
JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCtr6Hw5aX8.ttf
100 ms
JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCs16Hw5aX8.ttf
100 ms
JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCvr6Hw5aX8.ttf
100 ms
JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCtr6Xw5aX8.ttf
101 ms
JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCu173w5aX8.ttf
101 ms
JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCuM73w5aX8.ttf
103 ms
JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCvr73w5aX8.ttf
101 ms
JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCvC73w5aX8.ttf
102 ms
embed
317 ms
fontawesome-webfont.woff
632 ms
js
30 ms
search.js
4 ms
geometry.js
7 ms
main.js
11 ms
protectivepolymers.com accessibility score
ARIA
These are opportunities to improve the usage of ARIA in your application which may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
ARIA input fields do not have accessible names
Elements with an ARIA [role] that require children to contain a specific [role] are missing some or all of those required children.
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
protectivepolymers.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Displays images with incorrect aspect ratio
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Browser errors were logged to the console
Page has valid source maps
Issues were logged in the Issues panel in Chrome Devtools
protectivepolymers.com SEO score
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Protectivepolymers.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Protectivepolymers.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
protectivepolymers.com
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Protectivepolymers. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: