Tools & Wizards About Us
protectordoor.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 77

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    84% of other websites

  • 85

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 58% of websites

  • 83

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    55% of websites

  • 86

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    60% of websites

protectordoor.com

Security Windows & Doors | Detroit, MI | Protector Window & Door

Page Load Speed

1 sec in total

First Response

72 ms

Resources Loaded

448 ms

Page Rendered

504 ms

protectordoor.com screenshot

About Website

Visit protectordoor.com now to see the best up-to-date Protector Door content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about protectordoor.com

Call Protector Window & Door for all your security storm door and window needs in the Detroit, MI area. (313) 592-0300

Visit protectordoor.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Protectordoor.com page load time and found that the first response time was 72 ms and then it took 952 ms to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 20% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

protectordoor.com performance score

77

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value1.6 s

94/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value2.6 s

88/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value3.4 s

90/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value450 ms

63/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.004

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value9.6 s

29/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

protectordoor.com

72 ms

www.protectordoor.com

48 ms

Protector_logo_new-307w.png

139 ms

2-640w.jpg

120 ms

jquery-3.7.0.min.js

27 ms

Our browser made a total of 15 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 13% of them (2 requests) were addressed to the original Protectordoor.com, 40% (6 requests) were made to Lirp.cdn-website.com and 33% (5 requests) were made to Static.cdn-website.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (305 ms) relates to the external source Lirp.cdn-website.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 90.2 kB (32%)

Content Size

280.3 kB

After Optimization

190.2 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript

In fact, the total size of Protectordoor.com main page is 280.3 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 50% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 137.5 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-77%

Potential reduce by 90.1 kB

  • Original 116.8 kB
  • After minification 112.3 kB
  • After compression 26.7 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 90.1 kB or 77% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 0 B

  • Original 26.0 kB
  • After minification 26.0 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Protector Door images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 113 B

  • Original 137.5 kB
  • After minification 137.5 kB
  • After compression 137.4 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 3 (27%)

Requests Now

11

After Optimization

8

  • Images
  • JavaScript

The browser has sent 11 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Protector Door. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 4 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

protectordoor.com

protectordoor.com

72 ms

www.protectordoor.com

www.protectordoor.com

48 ms

Protector_logo_new-307w.png

Protector_logo_new-307w.png

139 ms

2-640w.jpg

2-640w.jpg

120 ms

jquery-3.7.0.min.js

jquery-3.7.0.min.js

27 ms

d-js-one-runtime-unified-desktop.min.js

d-js-one-runtime-unified-desktop.min.js

37 ms

d-js-jquery-migrate.min.js

d-js-jquery-migrate.min.js

35 ms

dxmscript.min.js

dxmscript.min.js

166 ms

123-1920w.jpg

123-1920w.jpg

176 ms

1130206176-663w.jpg

1130206176-663w.jpg

102 ms

1153683546-1920w.jpg

1153683546-1920w.jpg

193 ms

GettyImages-1171207388-1920w.jpg

GettyImages-1171207388-1920w.jpg

305 ms

GettyImages-11901484711-1920w.jpg

GettyImages-11901484711-1920w.jpg

161 ms

dm-font.woff

dm-font.woff

9 ms

fontawesome-webfont.woff

fontawesome-webfont.woff

3 ms

Accessibility Review

protectordoor.com accessibility score

85

Accessibility Issues

ARIA

These are opportunities to improve the usage of ARIA in your application which may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

[aria-hidden="true"] elements contain focusable descendents

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

<frame> or <iframe> elements do not have a title

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Best Practices

protectordoor.com best practices score

83

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Serves images with low resolution

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Page has valid source maps

SEO Factors

protectordoor.com SEO score

86

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Protectordoor.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Protectordoor.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

protectordoor.com

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Protector Door. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: