1.8 sec in total
308 ms
1.4 sec
103 ms
Click here to check amazing Protectview content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about protectview.com
Protectview.com offers you the opportunity of setting up your own video surveillance system.
Visit protectview.comWe analyzed Protectview.com page load time and found that the first response time was 308 ms and then it took 1.5 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 30% of websites can load faster.
protectview.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value2.9 s
55/100
10%
Value4.8 s
30/100
25%
Value3.8 s
84/100
10%
Value420 ms
66/100
30%
Value0.023
100/100
15%
Value8.2 s
41/100
10%
308 ms
67 ms
51 ms
67 ms
68 ms
Our browser made a total of 58 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 91% of them (53 requests) were addressed to the original Protectview.com, 5% (3 requests) were made to Pagead2.googlesyndication.com and 3% (2 requests) were made to Google-analytics.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (589 ms) belongs to the original domain Protectview.com.
Page size can be reduced by 99.3 kB (14%)
711.6 kB
612.4 kB
In fact, the total size of Protectview.com main page is 711.6 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 20% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 615.5 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 58.6 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 58.6 kB or 73% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 1.2 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Protectview needs image optimization as it can save up to 1.2 kB or 44% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.
Potential reduce by 36.2 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.
Potential reduce by 3.2 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Protectview.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 3.2 kB or 25% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 28 (49%)
57
29
The browser has sent 57 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Protectview. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 13 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 17 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
protectview.com
308 ms
MenuStyle.css
67 ms
PublicPage.css
51 ms
jshowoff.css
67 ms
ModalPopup.css
68 ms
jquery-1.7.1.min.js
123 ms
jquery.jshowoff.min.js
86 ms
jquery-ui-1.8.17.custom.min.js
156 ms
jquery.cookie.js
96 ms
jquery-ui-1.8.17.custom.css
98 ms
horizontal.css
98 ms
sly.min.js
137 ms
plugins.js
136 ms
horizontal.js
135 ms
themestyle_30.css
134 ms
menuhstyle_30.css
153 ms
cgridstyle_30.css
184 ms
pagestyle_2265.css
184 ms
WebResource.axd
183 ms
WebResource.axd
182 ms
WebResource.axd
186 ms
WebResource.axd
186 ms
WebResource.axd
193 ms
WebResource.axd
194 ms
WebResource.axd
194 ms
WebResource.axd
192 ms
Telerik.Web.UI.WebResource.axd
419 ms
show_ads.js
74 ms
ga.js
8 ms
ImageSkin_30_BackPage_F_1.jpg
41 ms
wbfImage.aspx
31 ms
ImageSkin_30_Cart_F_2.gif
42 ms
TopLeft.GIF
39 ms
TopRight.GIF
62 ms
wbfImage.aspx
72 ms
BottonLeft.GIF
73 ms
BottonRight.GIF
74 ms
wbfImage.aspx
74 ms
wbfImage.aspx
95 ms
wbfImage.aspx
104 ms
wbfImage.aspx
589 ms
PlainUp.gif
104 ms
plaindown.gif
105 ms
ImageSkin_30_Header_F_1.jpg
37 ms
ImageSkin_30_Middle_F_1.jpg
44 ms
LineTop.GIF
35 ms
LineLeft.GIF
36 ms
LineRight.GIF
60 ms
LineBotton.GIF
81 ms
wbfPage.aspx
80 ms
adsbygoogle.js
160 ms
__utm.gif
22 ms
WebResource.axd
29 ms
WebResource.axd
35 ms
WebResource.axd
28 ms
WebResource.axd
29 ms
WebResource.axd
30 ms
show_ads_impl.js
296 ms
protectview.com accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Internationalization and localization
These are opportunities to improve the interpretation of your content by users in different locales.
Impact
Issue
<html> element does not have a [lang] attribute
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
protectview.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Displays images with incorrect aspect ratio
Serves images with low resolution
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Missing source maps for large first-party JavaScript
protectview.com SEO score
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have descriptive text
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
EN
N/A
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Protectview.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that Protectview.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
protectview.com
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Protectview. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: