Tools & Wizards About Us
protext.by screenshot

Report Summary

  • 16

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    30% of other websites

  • 76

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 42% of websites

  • 92

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    80% of websites

  • 93

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    83% of websites

protext.by

Копирайтинг в Минске | Студия копирайтинга в Беларуси

Page Load Speed

7.9 sec in total

First Response

1.3 sec

Resources Loaded

6.3 sec

Page Rendered

239 ms

protext.by screenshot

About Website

Welcome to protext.by homepage info - get ready to check Protext best content for Belarus right away, or after learning these important things about protext.by

Студия профессионального копирайтинга в Беларуси. Агентство ProText оказывает профессиональные услуги копирайтинга в Минске по написанию текстов. Индивидуальный подход к каждому клиенту. Звоните! ☎ +3...

Visit protext.by

Key Findings

We analyzed Protext.by page load time and found that the first response time was 1.3 sec and then it took 6.5 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 80% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

protext.by performance score

16

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value4.2 s

19/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value7.9 s

3/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value10.3 s

8/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value2,270 ms

6/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.156

74/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value21.7 s

1/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

protext.by

1337 ms

reset.css

384 ms

main.css

580 ms

jquery.js

42 ms

jquery.cycle.all.js

774 ms

Our browser made a total of 45 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 76% of them (34 requests) were addressed to the original Protext.by, 4% (2 requests) were made to Googleadservices.com and 4% (2 requests) were made to Google-analytics.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (4.2 sec) relates to the external source Mc.yandex.ru.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 201.4 kB (36%)

Content Size

560.1 kB

After Optimization

358.7 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Protext.by main page is 560.1 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 20% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 286.0 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-75%

Potential reduce by 32.1 kB

  • Original 42.9 kB
  • After minification 38.6 kB
  • After compression 10.8 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 32.1 kB or 75% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-7%

Potential reduce by 19.0 kB

  • Original 286.0 kB
  • After minification 267.1 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Protext images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-63%

Potential reduce by 126.6 kB

  • Original 202.4 kB
  • After minification 183.5 kB
  • After compression 75.8 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 126.6 kB or 63% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-82%

Potential reduce by 23.7 kB

  • Original 28.8 kB
  • After minification 25.2 kB
  • After compression 5.1 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Protext.by needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 23.7 kB or 82% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 6 (16%)

Requests Now

38

After Optimization

32

  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 38 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Protext. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 7 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

protext.by

protext.by

1337 ms

reset.css

reset.css

384 ms

main.css

main.css

580 ms

jquery.js

jquery.js

42 ms

jquery.cycle.all.js

jquery.cycle.all.js

774 ms

jcarousellite_1.0.1.pack.js

jcarousellite_1.0.1.pack.js

603 ms

custom.js

custom.js

391 ms

conversion.js

conversion.js

22 ms

analytics.js

analytics.js

136 ms

150 ms

logo.png

logo.png

403 ms

subBg.png

subBg.png

214 ms

41px.png

41px.png

214 ms

showBg.gif

showBg.gif

213 ms

showA.gif

showA.gif

211 ms

showBg2.gif

showBg2.gif

211 ms

dash.gif

dash.gif

402 ms

butBg.png

butBg.png

585 ms

grRound.png

grRound.png

404 ms

blockShadow.png

blockShadow.png

402 ms

taxi.png

taxi.png

594 ms

Apps-basket-icon.png

Apps-basket-icon.png

1012 ms

Bento-icon.png

Bento-icon.png

1552 ms

protext+facebook.png

protext+facebook.png

592 ms

seo2.png

seo2.png

1164 ms

shopping-cart-icon.png

shopping-cart-icon.png

1349 ms

chooseArr.png

chooseArr.png

785 ms

chooseArr2.png

chooseArr2.png

784 ms

blog1.jpg

blog1.jpg

1166 ms

Norveg.png

Norveg.png

976 ms

grassmann-lomtev.png

grassmann-lomtev.png

1165 ms

dilis.png

dilis.png

1199 ms

altiora.jpg

altiora.jpg

1358 ms

maz.png

maz.png

1356 ms

footBg.gif

footBg.gif

1356 ms

dash2.gif

dash2.gif

1390 ms

watch.js

watch.js

238 ms

count.png

count.png

1423 ms

collect

collect

5 ms

collect

collect

74 ms

59 ms

42 ms

1421 ms

ga-audiences

ga-audiences

30 ms

watch.js

watch.js

4232 ms

Accessibility Review

protext.by accessibility score

76

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Form elements do not have associated labels

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Best practices

These items highlight common accessibility best practices.

Impact

Issue

High

[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.

Best Practices

protext.by best practices score

92

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Page has valid source maps

SEO Factors

protext.by SEO score

93

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Page is blocked from indexing

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    RU

  • Language Claimed

    N/A

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Protext.by can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that Russian is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that Protext.by main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

protext.by

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Protext. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: