2.3 sec in total
645 ms
1.3 sec
324 ms
Welcome to protext.com homepage info - get ready to check Protext best content right away, or after learning these important things about protext.com
Transcript Condensing and Indexing software. ProTEXT. Compatible with all CAT Software and Legal Software.
Visit protext.comWe analyzed Protext.com page load time and found that the first response time was 645 ms and then it took 1.7 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 30% of websites can load faster.
protext.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value2.5 s
67/100
10%
Value2.6 s
88/100
25%
Value2.9 s
94/100
10%
Value0 ms
100/100
30%
Value0
100/100
15%
Value2.5 s
98/100
10%
645 ms
293 ms
380 ms
247 ms
386 ms
Our browser made a total of 15 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 93% of them (14 requests) were addressed to the original Protext.com, 7% (1 request) were made to Google-analytics.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (692 ms) belongs to the original domain Protext.com.
Page size can be reduced by 88.0 kB (22%)
395.6 kB
307.5 kB
In fact, the total size of Protext.com main page is 395.6 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. Only 5% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 303.5 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 67.2 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 67.2 kB or 89% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 12.0 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Protext images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 971 B
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 971 B or 14% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 7.8 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Protext.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 7.8 kB or 84% of the original size.
We found no issues to fix!
14
14
The browser has sent 14 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Protext. According to our analytics all requests are already optimized.
protext.com
645 ms
default.css
293 ms
ETSLogoFeb2001.jpg
380 ms
TryItNowFree.jpg
247 ms
ProTEXTSmallImage.gif
386 ms
DownloadButton.jpg
172 ms
SupportButton.jpg
165 ms
PricesButton.jpg
214 ms
OrderButton.jpg
248 ms
ContactButton.jpg
246 ms
LinksButton.jpg
237 ms
val_sig1.gif
272 ms
PTtest5.png
692 ms
urchin.js
6 ms
CSSbk.png
176 ms
protext.com accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Internationalization and localization
These are opportunities to improve the interpretation of your content by users in different locales.
Impact
Issue
<html> element does not have a [lang] attribute
protext.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Serves images with low resolution
General
Impact
Issue
Browser errors were logged to the console
Issues were logged in the Issues panel in Chrome Devtools
protext.com SEO score
N/A
EN
UNICODE
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Protext.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Unfortunately we cannot identify language used on the page (probably there is a mix of languages, too little text or something else), while the claimed language is English. Our system also found out that Protext.com main page’s claimed encoding is unicode. Changing it to UTF-8 can be a good choice, as this format is commonly used for encoding all over the web and thus their visitors won’t have any troubles with symbol transcription or reading.
protext.com
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Protext. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: