Tools & Wizards About Us
prp.co.in screenshot

Report Summary

  • 13

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    25% of other websites

  • 93

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 80% of websites

  • 75

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    35% of websites

  • 93

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    83% of websites

prp.co.in

PRP Remote Surveillance Systems - CCTV Dealers in Pune

Page Load Speed

10.6 sec in total

First Response

2.2 sec

Resources Loaded

8 sec

Page Rendered

360 ms

prp.co.in screenshot

About Website

Click here to check amazing PRP content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about prp.co.in

CCTV Dealers in Pune, CCTV for Home, CCTV for Shop, CCTV for Factory, CCTV For Corporate Office, CCTV for Industry

Visit prp.co.in

Key Findings

We analyzed Prp.co.in page load time and found that the first response time was 2.2 sec and then it took 8.4 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 85% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

prp.co.in performance score

13

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value7.8 s

0/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value12.0 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value15.4 s

1/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value4,850 ms

0/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.14

79/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value14.1 s

9/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

prp.co.in

2221 ms

wp-emoji-release.min.js

402 ms

style.min.css

636 ms

styles.css

860 ms

header-footer-elementor.css

854 ms

Our browser made a total of 67 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 99% of them (66 requests) were addressed to the original Prp.co.in, 1% (1 request) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (2.2 sec) belongs to the original domain Prp.co.in.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 159.3 kB (18%)

Content Size

879.4 kB

After Optimization

720.1 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Prp.co.in main page is 879.4 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 55% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 499.4 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-84%

Potential reduce by 85.6 kB

  • Original 101.3 kB
  • After minification 97.2 kB
  • After compression 15.7 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 85.6 kB or 84% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 0 B

  • Original 499.4 kB
  • After minification 499.4 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. PRP images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-23%

Potential reduce by 29.8 kB

  • Original 129.4 kB
  • After minification 129.4 kB
  • After compression 99.6 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 29.8 kB or 23% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-29%

Potential reduce by 44.0 kB

  • Original 149.4 kB
  • After minification 149.4 kB
  • After compression 105.4 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Prp.co.in needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 44.0 kB or 29% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 45 (75%)

Requests Now

60

After Optimization

15

  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 60 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of PRP. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 21 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 26 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

prp.co.in

prp.co.in

2221 ms

wp-emoji-release.min.js

wp-emoji-release.min.js

402 ms

style.min.css

style.min.css

636 ms

styles.css

styles.css

860 ms

header-footer-elementor.css

header-footer-elementor.css

854 ms

elementor-icons.min.css

elementor-icons.min.css

899 ms

animations.min.css

animations.min.css

896 ms

frontend-legacy.min.css

frontend-legacy.min.css

909 ms

frontend.min.css

frontend.min.css

1153 ms

post-97.css

post-97.css

1066 ms

typing-effect.min.css

typing-effect.min.css

1079 ms

global.css

global.css

1122 ms

post-100.css

post-100.css

1124 ms

frontend.css

frontend.css

1142 ms

post-69.css

post-69.css

1280 ms

post-112.css

post-112.css

1302 ms

post-136.css

post-136.css

1344 ms

all.min.css

all.min.css

1351 ms

simple-line-icons.min.css

simple-line-icons.min.css

1370 ms

magnific-popup.min.css

magnific-popup.min.css

1471 ms

slick.min.css

slick.min.css

1514 ms

style.min.css

style.min.css

1534 ms

merged-icons-font.css

merged-icons-font.css

1567 ms

css

css

30 ms

fontawesome.min.css

fontawesome.min.css

1576 ms

solid.min.css

solid.min.css

1594 ms

brands.min.css

brands.min.css

1707 ms

jquery.min.js

jquery.min.js

1944 ms

jquery-migrate.min.js

jquery-migrate.min.js

1756 ms

reading-progress.min.css

reading-progress.min.css

1707 ms

regenerator-runtime.min.js

regenerator-runtime.min.js

1634 ms

wp-polyfill.min.js

wp-polyfill.min.js

1657 ms

index.js

index.js

1851 ms

imagesloaded.min.js

imagesloaded.min.js

1853 ms

magnific-popup.min.js

magnific-popup.min.js

1858 ms

lightbox.min.js

lightbox.min.js

1884 ms

main.min.js

main.min.js

2162 ms

frontend.js

frontend.js

1997 ms

reading-progress.min.js

reading-progress.min.js

1789 ms

webpack.runtime.min.js

webpack.runtime.min.js

1570 ms

frontend-modules.min.js

frontend-modules.min.js

1408 ms

waypoints.min.js

waypoints.min.js

1430 ms

core.min.js

core.min.js

1492 ms

swiper.min.js

swiper.min.js

1757 ms

share-link.min.js

share-link.min.js

1521 ms

dialog.min.js

dialog.min.js

1419 ms

frontend.min.js

frontend.min.js

1442 ms

preloaded-modules.min.js

preloaded-modules.min.js

1447 ms

bghome-scaled-1.jpg

bghome-scaled-1.jpg

1615 ms

PRP-Banner-logo-1-1024x458.jpg

PRP-Banner-logo-1-1024x458.jpg

619 ms

PRP-08-1.jpg

PRP-08-1.jpg

668 ms

PRP-10-1.jpg

PRP-10-1.jpg

725 ms

PRP-03-1.jpg

PRP-03-1.jpg

765 ms

Thermal-Camera-1.jpg

Thermal-Camera-1.jpg

810 ms

PRP-06-1.jpg

PRP-06-1.jpg

831 ms

PRP-09-1.jpg

PRP-09-1.jpg

911 ms

Smartphone-1.jpg

Smartphone-1.jpg

914 ms

Smart-1.jpg

Smart-1.jpg

1166 ms

School-1.jpg

School-1.jpg

1007 ms

Safety-health.jpg

Safety-health.jpg

1039 ms

home-automation-1.jpg

home-automation-1.jpg

1050 ms

CCTV-AMC-1.jpg

CCTV-AMC-1.jpg

1144 ms

fa-solid-900.woff

fa-solid-900.woff

1385 ms

fa-solid-900.woff

fa-solid-900.woff

1467 ms

fa-regular-400.woff

fa-regular-400.woff

1222 ms

fa-brands-400.woff

fa-brands-400.woff

1236 ms

fa-brands-400.woff

fa-brands-400.woff

1333 ms

Accessibility Review

prp.co.in accessibility score

93

Accessibility Issues

ARIA

These are opportunities to improve the usage of ARIA in your application which may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

[aria-*] attributes do not match their roles

Best Practices

prp.co.in best practices score

75

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

High

Issues were logged in the Issues panel in Chrome Devtools

SEO Factors

prp.co.in SEO score

93

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Prp.co.in can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Prp.co.in main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

prp.co.in

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of PRP. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: