4.2 sec in total
96 ms
3.4 sec
687 ms
Visit pulseone.com now to see the best up-to-date Pulse One content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about pulseone.com
Managed IT services for small & medium businesses, including professional on-site support, customizable managed services, cloud & security solutions.
Visit pulseone.comWe analyzed Pulseone.com page load time and found that the first response time was 96 ms and then it took 4.1 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 65% of websites can load faster.
pulseone.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value3.4 s
37/100
10%
Value13.4 s
0/100
25%
Value11.5 s
5/100
10%
Value4,490 ms
0/100
30%
Value0.007
100/100
15%
Value19.6 s
2/100
10%
96 ms
2604 ms
70 ms
25 ms
31 ms
Our browser made a total of 87 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 69% of them (60 requests) were addressed to the original Pulseone.com, 11% (10 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 3% (3 requests) were made to Google.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (2.6 sec) belongs to the original domain Pulseone.com.
Page size can be reduced by 594.3 kB (36%)
1.7 MB
1.1 MB
In fact, the total size of Pulseone.com main page is 1.7 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 75% of websites need less resources to load and that’s why Accessify’s recommendations for optimization and resource minification can be helpful for this project. HTML takes 624.9 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 509.0 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 509.0 kB or 81% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 3 B
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Pulse One images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 85.3 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 85.3 kB or 16% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 14 B
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Pulseone.com has all CSS files already compressed.
Number of requests can be reduced by 39 (59%)
66
27
The browser has sent 66 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Pulse One. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 40 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.
pulseone.com
96 ms
pulseone.com
2604 ms
script.js
70 ms
jquery.min.js
25 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
31 ms
icons.min.js
44 ms
ie-compat.min.js
48 ms
dnxt-text-animation.js
48 ms
wow.min.js
47 ms
scripts.js
43 ms
embed.js
57 ms
api.js
141 ms
19914677.js
279 ms
hooks.min.js
44 ms
i18n.min.js
49 ms
index.js
46 ms
index.js
50 ms
wpcf7r-fe.js
49 ms
idle-timer.min.js
54 ms
custom.js
53 ms
front.min.js
51 ms
scripts.min.js
56 ms
es6-promise.auto.min.js
54 ms
api.js
159 ms
recaptcha.js
54 ms
frontend-bundle.min.js
55 ms
frontend-bundle.min.js
59 ms
vanilla-tilt.min.js
57 ms
common.js
55 ms
api.js
177 ms
wp-polyfill.min.js
56 ms
index.js
59 ms
hoverIntent.min.js
58 ms
maxmegamenu.js
130 ms
swiper-bundle.min.js
132 ms
splc-script.min.js
132 ms
brave.js
132 ms
jquery.fitvids.js
131 ms
lazyload.min.js
132 ms
log
628 ms
POTS_logo_new_386x83.png
27 ms
it-services.jpg
14 ms
it-help-desk-img-1.jpg
115 ms
it-general-services-img-7.jpg
114 ms
it-general-services-img-5.jpg
116 ms
it-general-services-img-2-1.jpg
116 ms
it-project-img-4.jpg
117 ms
spinner.svg
19 ms
logo_1.jpg
116 ms
MicrosoftTeams-image.jpg
118 ms
logo_5.jpg
119 ms
logo_7.jpg
118 ms
logo_8.jpg
317 ms
logo_new_1.jpg
252 ms
logo_new_2.jpg
316 ms
logo_new_4.jpg
251 ms
logo_new_3.jpg
315 ms
logo_new_5.jpg
316 ms
baracuda.jpg
316 ms
avepoint.jpg
316 ms
seed-pod.jpg
349 ms
rethnik.jpg
349 ms
knit-technology.jpg
348 ms
memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgshZ1y4k.woff
230 ms
memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgshZ1y4n.ttf
252 ms
memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsg-1y4k.woff
279 ms
memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsg-1y4n.ttf
279 ms
memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsgH1y4k.woff
279 ms
memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsgH1y4n.ttf
279 ms
memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsjZ0C4k.woff
278 ms
memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsjZ0C4n.ttf
278 ms
memQYaGs126MiZpBA-UFUIcVXSCEkx2cmqvXlWq8tWZ0Pw86hd0Rk8ZkaVQ.woff
285 ms
memQYaGs126MiZpBA-UFUIcVXSCEkx2cmqvXlWq8tWZ0Pw86hd0Rk8ZkaVc.ttf
285 ms
modules.woff
228 ms
wARDj0u
127 ms
fa-brands-400.woff
227 ms
fa-regular-400.woff
225 ms
fa-solid-900.woff
257 ms
fa-brands-400.woff
277 ms
fontawesome-webfont.woff
227 ms
1f8Qk_sDiQFyMVIuOirILQAbuu9h
108 ms
v3.js
3 ms
1f8Qk_sDiQFyMVIuOirILQAbuu9h
34 ms
form_standalone.css
34 ms
project_for_standalone_legacy.js
49 ms
project_for_standalone.js
55 ms
v2.js
22 ms
pulseone.com accessibility score
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have a discernible name
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
pulseone.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Browser errors were logged to the console
Page has valid source maps
pulseone.com SEO score
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Pulseone.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Pulseone.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
pulseone.com
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Pulse One. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: