17.8 sec in total
1.1 sec
15.6 sec
1.1 sec
Click here to check amazing Pureparty content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about pureparty.co.uk
Find the perfect fancy dress and
Visit pureparty.co.ukWe analyzed Pureparty.co.uk page load time and found that the first response time was 1.1 sec and then it took 16.7 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 90% of websites can load faster.
pureparty.co.uk performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value3.3 s
40/100
10%
Value10.1 s
0/100
25%
Value17.2 s
0/100
10%
Value230 ms
86/100
30%
Value0.279
43/100
15%
Value7.1 s
51/100
10%
1077 ms
29 ms
670 ms
472 ms
623 ms
Our browser made a total of 71 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 90% of them (64 requests) were addressed to the original Pureparty.co.uk, 6% (4 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 3% (2 requests) were made to Google-analytics.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (14 sec) belongs to the original domain Pureparty.co.uk.
Page size can be reduced by 1.3 MB (23%)
5.9 MB
4.6 MB
In fact, the total size of Pureparty.co.uk main page is 5.9 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 50% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 5.1 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 66.5 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 10.0 kB, which is 12% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 66.5 kB or 80% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 739.9 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Pureparty needs image optimization as it can save up to 739.9 kB or 14% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.
Potential reduce by 236.3 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 236.3 kB or 69% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 305.7 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Pureparty.co.uk needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 305.7 kB or 85% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 26 (41%)
64
38
The browser has sent 64 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Pureparty. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 14 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 14 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
pureparty.co.uk
1077 ms
css
29 ms
bootstrap.min.css
670 ms
font-awesome.css
472 ms
fs-style-movement.css
623 ms
owl.carousel.css
128 ms
owl.theme.css
167 ms
owl.transitions.css
264 ms
flexslider.css
307 ms
fsslidemenu.css
312 ms
fs-style-basics.css
281 ms
fs-style.css
287 ms
pcss3fs.css
323 ms
futurestore-colours.css
366 ms
fs-style-responsive.css
389 ms
jquery.min.js
489 ms
bootstrap.min.js
579 ms
webslidemenu.js
366 ms
owl.carousel.min.js
379 ms
modernizr.custom.js
414 ms
jquery.stellar.js
444 ms
masonry.pkgd.min.js
472 ms
waypoints.min.js
478 ms
jquery.flexslider.js
690 ms
typeahead.js
569 ms
searchresults-dynamic.asp
561 ms
futurestore.scripts.js
588 ms
controlpaneltab.js
596 ms
futurestore.js
656 ms
small-logo.png
508 ms
pureparty.png
515 ms
pureparty-left.png
507 ms
banner20.jpg
746 ms
banner21.jpg
682 ms
banner22.jpg
4948 ms
banner24.jpg
662 ms
banner1.jpg
736 ms
banner2.jpg
811 ms
banner3.jpg
982 ms
banner4.jpg
867 ms
banner5.jpg
947 ms
banner6.jpg
875 ms
ga.js
7 ms
banner7.jpg
998 ms
__utm.gif
11 ms
banner8.jpg
1026 ms
banner10.jpg
1006 ms
banner11.jpg
1017 ms
banner12.jpg
1057 ms
banner13.jpg
1118 ms
banner14.jpg
1091 ms
2709-1.jpg
1038 ms
2600-1.jpg
1026 ms
2492-1.jpg
1063 ms
2489-1.jpg
1090 ms
2717-1.jpg
1067 ms
2495-1.jpg
1033 ms
2555-1.jpg
1022 ms
banner15.jpg
14024 ms
banner16.jpg
5325 ms
banner17.jpg
8191 ms
facebook.png
1036 ms
paypal.png
1009 ms
shadow.png
951 ms
tmstripe.png
979 ms
fontawesome-webfont.woff
1002 ms
S6uyw4BMUTPHjx4wWw.ttf
19 ms
S6u9w4BMUTPHh7USSwiPHA.ttf
44 ms
S6u9w4BMUTPHh6UVSwiPHA.ttf
44 ms
JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCtr6Hw5aX8.ttf
43 ms
fontawesome-webfont.ttf
170 ms
pureparty.co.uk accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
[id] attributes on active, focusable elements are not unique
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Links do not have a discernible name
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
pureparty.co.uk best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Serves images with low resolution
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Browser errors were logged to the console
pureparty.co.uk SEO score
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have descriptive text
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
Links are not crawlable
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Pureparty.co.uk can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Pureparty.co.uk main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
pureparty.co.uk
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Pureparty. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: